Dental caries surveys
considerations about reproducibility
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35699/2178-1990.2021.26960Keywords:
Dental caries, DMF index, Epidemiology, Reproducibility of resultsAbstract
Aim: To evaluate the impact of the recording of teeth whose clinical conditions rarely vary (anterior teeth and third molars) in inter-examiner agreement measurements.
Methods: Clinical data from 56 schoolchildren, 12 years of age, previously collected by two examiners, according to the “Oral Health Surveys: basic methods” codes and criteria, were analyzed in the present study. The effects from including/excluding such teeth upon reproducibility were measured by general percentage agreement (GPA) and Kappa statistics (к) performances.
Results: The exclusion of anterior teeth associated with the inclusion of third molars produced a decrease in GPA that was simultaneous to an increase in the weighted Kappa (nominal data) and simple (dichotomous data) values. The incorrect inclusion of third molars (GPA = 100%; к = + 1) in the reproducibility measurement artificially increased the inter-examiner Kappa values.
Conclusion: The inclusion/exclusion of anterior teeth and third molars, seeking a more reliable agreement among examiners, can have a positive or negative impact on the measured reproducibility values. A clear warning about the impact of including third molars in the reproducibility measurement, in the 12 years old age group, should be performed in “Oral Health Surveys: basic methods” and similar manuals.
Downloads
References
World Health Organization (WHO). Oral health surveys: basic methods. 5th ed. Geneva: WHO Press; 2013.
Pereira AC, Vieira V, Frias AC. Pesquisa estadual de saúde bucal: relatório final. Águas de São Pedro: Livronovo, 2016.
Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Measur. 1960;20(1):37-46.
Feinstein AR, Cicchetti DV. High agreement but low Kappa: I. The problems of two paradoxes. J Clin Epidemiol. 1990;43(6):543-9.
Sim J, Wright CC. The Kappa statistics in reliability studies: use, interpretation, and sample size requirements. Phys Ther. 2005;85(3):257-68.
Viera AJ, Garrett JM. Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. Fam Med. 2005;37(5):360-3.
Tonello AS, Silva RP, Assaf AV, Ambrosano GMB, Peres SHCS, Pereira AC, et al. Inter-examiner agreement dental caries epidemiological surveys: the importance of disease prevalence in the sample. Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2016;19(2):272-9.
Narvai PC, Frazão P, Roncalli AG, Antunes JLF. [Dental caries in Brazil: decline, polarization, inequality and social exclusion]. Rev Panam Salud Pública. 2006;19(6):385-93. [Portuguese].
Batchelor, PA, Sheiham A. Grouping of tooth surfaces by susceptibility to caries: a study in 5-16 year-old children. BMC Oral Health. 2004;4(1):1-6.
Oulis C, Theodorou M, Mastrogiannakis T, Mamai-Chomata E, Polychronopoulou A, Athanasouli T. Oral health status and treatment needs of the Hellenic Population - a pathfinder survey - proposals for improvement. Hellenic Stomatological Review. 2009;53:97-120.
Carvalho JC. Caries process on occlusal surfaces: evolving evidence and understanding. Caries Res. 2014;48(4):339-46.
Ahlqwist M, Gröndahl HG. Prevalence of impacted teeth and associated pathology in middle-aged and older Swedish women. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1991;19(2):116-9.
Song F, O’Meara S, Wilson P, Golder S, Kleijnen J. The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of prophylactic removal of wisdom teeth. Health Technol Assess. 2000;4(15):1-55.
Mettes TG, Nienhuijs MEL, van der Sanden WJM, Verdonschot EH, Plasschaert AJM. Interventions for treating asymptomatic impacted wisdom teeth in adolescents and adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;18(2):CD003879.
Tagliaferro EPS, Meneghim MC, Ambrosano GMB, Pereira AC, Sales-Peres SHC, Sales-Peres A, et al. Distribution and prevalence of dental caries in Bauru, Brazil, 1976-2006. Int Dent J. 2008;58(2):75-80.
World Health Organization (WHO). Oral health surveys: basic methods. 4th ed. Geneva: WHO Press; 1997.
Peres MA, Traebert J, Marcenes W. Calibration of examiners for dental caries epidemiological studies. Cad Saúde Pública. 2001;17(1):153-9.
Donner A, Eliasziw M. Statistical implications of the choice between a dichotomous or continuous trait in studies of interobserver agreement. Biometrics. 1994;50(2):550-5.
Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. SAS/SVS/Departamento de Atenção Básica. Coordenação Nacional de Saúde Bucal. SB Brasil 2010: Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde Bucal. Manual de Calibração de Examinadores. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2009. Disponível em: http://www.saude.gov.br/bucal.
Secretaria Estadual da Saúde do Estado de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Piracicaba - UNICAMP. SB São Paulo 2015: Pesquisa Estadual de Saúde Bucal. Manual de Calibração de Examinadores. São Paulo, Piracicaba, SP: A Secretaria; 2015. Disponível em: https://w2.fop.unicamp.br/sbsp2015/down/manual_de_calibracao_SBSP_2015.pdf.
