Influence of the soldering type in fitting prostheses on implants

a scanning electronic microscopy analysis

Authors

  • Paulo Cézar Simamoto Júnior Universidade Federal de Uberlândia
  • Veridiana Resende Novais Universidade Federal de Uberlândia
  • Mauro Antônio de Arruda Nóbilo Universidade Estadual de Campinas
  • Gustavo Augusto Seabra Barbosa Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte
  • Carlos José Soares Universidade Federal de Uberlândia
  • Flávio Domingues das Neves Universidade Federal de Uberlândia

Keywords:

Dental prosthesis, Implant-supported, Microscopy, Electron, Scanning

Abstract

The aim of this in vitro study was to comparatively analyze the effect of the soldering type on the fixed prosthesis interface of three elements, using two master models with implants positioned in aligned (straight line) and non-aligned (arch) manners. Twelve work models were divided into four groups (n=3): LA, welding/arch; BA, brazing/arch; LR, welding/straight line; and BR, brazing/straight line, to compare the adjustment qualities of laser welding and brazing processes. After each laboratorial, casting and welding stage, the prostheses were positioned within the master model to assess the abutment/implant interface, thus verifying the adaptation quality both horizontally and vertically. A scanning electron microscope (LEO-435 VP– Germany), at 500X magnification, was used for this analysis. The obtained results were duly logged and submitted to statistical treatment through non- parametric analysis, Mann-Whitney, in a paired form comparing the different soldering and alignment processes (p>0,05). As regards the vertical adjustment, no statistically significant differences could be observed among the different soldering processes nor in the influence of cast structure design in the adaptation of parts. Nevertheless, absolute values of the vertical and horizontal adjustment after the soldering processes were higher for the four groups assessed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

May KB, Edge MJ, Russell MM, Razzoog ME, Lang BR. The precision of fit at the implant prosthodontics interface. J Prosthet Dent. 1997; 77:497-502.

Riedy SJ, Lang BR, Lang BE. Fit of implant frameworks fabricated by different techiniques. J Prosthet Dent. 1997; 78:596-604.

Wee AG, Aquilino SA, Schneider RL. Strategies to achieve fit in implant prosthodontics: a review of the literature. Int J Prosthodont. 1999; 12:167-78.

Bianchini MA. Avaliação da adaptação passiva de próteses fixas aparafusadas sobre implantes: um estudo in vitro. (Dissertação). Florianópolis. Centro de Ciências da Saúde da Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, 2001.

Hurson S. Laboratory techniques to prevent screw loosening on dental implants. J Dent Techn. 1996; 13:30-7.

Seibel E. Alterações dimensionais durante a soldagem a laser e brasagem com tocha de oxigênio-propano. (Tese). São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia da Universidade de São Paulo, 2002.

Souza PCRD, Dinato JC, Bottino MA, Guastaldi AC. Brasagem e soldagem a laser de uma liga Ni-Cr. Rev Pós-Grad Fac Odontol Säo José dos Campos 2000; 3:7-16.

Evans DB. Correting the fit of implant-retained restorations by electric discharge machining. J Prosthet Dent. 1997; 77:212-5.

Takahashi T, Gunne J. Fit of implant frameworks: an in vitro comparison between two fabrication techniques J Prosthet Dent. 2003; 89:256-60.

Jemt T, Book K. Prosthesis misfit and marginal bone loss in edentulous implant patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996; 11:620-5.

Kan JY et al. Clinical methods for evaluating implant framework fit. J Prosthet Dent. 1999; 81:7-13.

Silveira Junior CD, Neves FD, Fernandes Neto AJ, Mendonça G. Influência dos procedimentos laboratoriais na adaptação pilar-UCLA/implante: estudo piloto. Rev Bras Prótese Clín Laboratorial 2002; 4:392-400.

Simamoto Junior PC, Barbosa GAS, Soares CJ, Fernandes Neto AJ, Neves FD. Desajuste vertical antes e após o emprego de retificadores para pilares de prótese implantada tipo UCLA fundíveis. Cienc Odontol Bras. 2005; 8:67-74.

Byrne D, Houston F, Cleary R, Claffey N. The fit of cast and premachined implant abutments. J Prosthet Dent. 1998; 80:82-92.

Estrela C. Metodologia científica. São Paulo:Artes Médicas; 2001.

De La Cruz JE, Funkenbusch PD, Ercoli C,Moss ME, Graser GN, Tallents RH. Verificationjig for implant-supported prostheses: A comparison of standard impressions with verification jigs made of different materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2002; 88:329-36.

Schiffleger BE, Ziebert GJ, Dhuru VB, Brantley WA, Sigaroudi K. Comparison of accuracy of multiunit one-piece casting. J Prosthet Dent. 1985; 54:770-6.

Sjögren G, Anndersson M, Bergman M. Laser welding of titanium in dentistry. Acta Odontol Scand. 1988; 46:247-53.

Quirynen M, Bollen CM, Eyssen H, Van Steenberghe D. Microbial penetration along the implant components of the Brånemark System®, an in vitro study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1994; 5:239-44.

Published

2016-03-14

How to Cite

Júnior, P. C. S., Novais, V. R., Nóbilo, M. A. de A., Barbosa, G. A. S., Soares, C. J., & Neves, F. D. das. (2016). Influence of the soldering type in fitting prostheses on implants: a scanning electronic microscopy analysis. Arquivos Em Odontologia, 44(1). Retrieved from https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/arquivosemodontologia/article/view/3459

Issue

Section

Artigos