General considerations on resin-bonded fixed partial denture
Keywords:
Resin-Bonded, Tooth preparation prostodontic, Dental abutmentsAbstract
The success rate of resin-bonded fixed partial dentures is directly related to the adhesive system and the tooth preparation design for good retention. These resin-bonded bridges represent a prosthodontic alternative, based on their cost- effectiveness, conservative techniques, and ease of laboratory manufacturing. Through a thorough review of the literature, this study aimed to report on cavity designs, types of materials used, and the advantages and disadvantages of the resin-bonded fixed partial denture. One of significant advantages of the resin-bonded fixed partial dentures is the conservation of the tooth structure, whereas its main disadvantage includes aesthetic limitations, given that the alloy may in fact be visible. Preparation design, cement type, and casting alloy type, as well as surface treatment, are among the factors that influence the longevity of resin-bonded fixed partial dentures. Treatments with resin-bonded fixed partial dentures present a bright outlook regarding the conservation of tooth structures, as well as a high level of success.
Downloads
References
Lopes LN. Prótese adesiva: procedimentos clínicos e laboratoriais. 2.ed. São Paulo: CID; 176 Considerações gerais sobre prótese fixa adesiva 1997.
Rochette AL. Attachment of a splint to enamel of lower anterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1973; 30:418-23.
Howe DF, Denehy GE. Anterior fixed partial dentures utilizing the acid-etch technique and a cast metal framework. J Prosthet Dent. 1977; 37: 28-31.
Livaditis GJ. Cast metal resin-bonded retainers for posterior teeth. J Am Dent Assoc. 1980; 101:926-9.
Gibson CJ. A modified technique for minimalpreparation, resin-retained bridge case reports. Dent Update. 2001; 28:442-8.
Stokes A. Clinical aspects of resin-bonded bridges. N Z Dent J. 2002; 98:107-10.
Imbery TA, Eshelman EG. Resin-bonded fixed partial dentures: a review of three decades of progress. J Am Dent Assoc. 1996; 127:1751-60.
Ulbrich NL, Gebert AP, Mathias AL, Schraiber VL, Vaz MA. Prótese adesiva sem metal com sistema cerâmico IPS Empress 2: apresentação de caso clínico. PCL. 2002; 4:365-9.
Rehder Filho P. Prótese adesiva. Uma revisão de literatura. Rev Assoc Paul Cir Dent. 1991; 45:421-4.
Boening KW. Clinical performance of resinbonded fixed partial dentures. Prosthet Dent. 1996; 76:39-44.
Campanha NH, Seó RS, Segalla JC, Silva RH. Próteses adesivas sem metal. Uma revisão de literatura. Rev Odontol UNESP 2005; 34:119-28.
Pegoraro LF. Prótese fixa adesiva. In: Prótese fixa. São Paulo: Artes Médicas; 2002. p.69-84.
Mondelli J. Próteses fixas adesivas diretas e indiretas. Rev Assoc Paul Odont. 1984; 38:18.
Tarozzo A, et al. Comparison of retentive systems for composites used as alternatives porcelain in fixed partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent. 2003; 89:572-8.
Mezzomo E. et al. Prótese adesiva. In: Reabilitação oral para o clínico. 3.ed. São Paulo: Santos;1997. p.427-58.
Wood M. Anterior etched cast-resin bonded bridges: an alternative for adolescent patients. Pediatr Dent. 1983; 5:172-6.
Wood M, et al. Etched casting resin bonded retainers: design and fabrication II. Quintessence Dent Technol. 1983; 7:479-80.
Mc Laughlin G. Prótese fixa adesiva: a alternativa avançada. São Paulo: Roca; 1991.
El Salam Shakal MA, Pfeiffer P, Hilgers RD. Effect of tooth preparation design on bond strengths of resin-bonded prostheses: a pilot study. J Prosthet Dent. 1997; 77:243-9.
Pospiech P, Rammelsberg P, Goldhofer G, Gernet W. All-ceramic resin-bonded bridges. A 3-dimensional finite-element analysis study. Eur J Oral Sci. 1996; 104:390-5.
Zugliani RA, Moreira SM, Zugliani MP. Prótese adesiva imediata: uso de uma nova geração de resinas reforçadas. Rev Bras Odontol. 1999; 56:288-90.
Hansson O, Bergström B. A longitudinal study of resin-bonded prostheses. J Prosthet Dent. 1996; 76:132-9.
El-Mowafy O, Rubo MH. Retention of a posterior resin-bonded fixed partial denture with a modified design: an in vitro study. Int J Prosthodont. 2000; 13:425-31.
Jacobsen PH, Rees JS: Luting agents for ceramic and polymeric inlays and onlays. Int Dent J. 1992; 42:145-9.
Fonseca RG, Adabo GL, Cruz CA, Santos PH. Avaliação da dureza superficial e do conteúdo de carga de cimentos resinosos. Rev Assoc Paul Cir Dent. 2000; 54:30-3.
Pace LL, Hummel SK, Marker VA, Bolouri A. Comparison of the flexural strength of five adhesive resin cements. J Prosthodont. 2007; 16:18-24.
Malone WF et al. Prótese adesiva (Prótese de Maryland). In: Teoria e prática de prótese fixa de Tylman. 8.ed. São Paulo: Artes Médicas; 1991. p.237-48.
Goodacre, et al. Clinical complications in fixed prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent. 2003; 90:31-41.
Priest G. An 11-year reevaluation of resin-bonded fixed partial dentures. Int J Periodontics Dent. 1995; 15:238-47.
Creugers NH, Käyser AF, Van’t Hof MA. A seven-and-a-half-year survival study of resinbonded bridges. J Dent Res. 1992; 71:1822-5.
Durr D, Schultelb R, Kern M, Strub JR. Clinical comparison of porcelain-fused-to-metal and all-porcelain resin-bonded bridges. J Dent Res. 1993; (IADR Abstracts) 908; 217.
