In vitro evaluation of cytotoxicity of different brands of artificial teeth

Authors

  • João Milton Rocha Gusmão Universidade Estadual do Sudoeste da Bahia
  • Matheus Melo Pithon Universidade Estadual do Sudoeste da Bahia
  • Rogerio Lacerda dos Santos Universidade Estadual da Paraíba
  • Maria Teresa Villele Romanos Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7308/aodontol/2012.48.3.01

Keywords:

Tooth artificial, Evaluation studies, Cell line

Abstract

Aim: The present study aimed to evaluate the cytotoxicity of different brands of stock acrylic teeth against fibroblast cells.

Materials and Methods: For this experiment, the cell lineage used was the L929 from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Rockville, MD, USA). The brands of stock teeth tested included: Artplus, Biolux, Biotone, Pop Dent, Vipi Dent, Orthosit Ivoclar, Biocler, and Trilux. Each group was placed in contact with the fibroblast cells for the periods of 24, 48, 72, and 168 hours. Control cells, as well as negative and positive controls, were used to compare the extremes.

Results: The results showed cytotoxicity for all the groups tested in the time periods of 24, 48, and 72 hours during the experiment, which occurred in the Orthosit Ivoclar and Trilux groups even after the experiment had been conducted for 168 hours.

Conclusion: The researched acrylic teeth developed cytotoxicity against the cells in vitro during the time periods of 24, 48, and 72 hours, while Ivoclar Vivodent and Trilux brands of teeth developed cytotoxicity against the tested cells during the time period of 168 hours.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Kiyak HA, Mulligan K. Studies of the relationship between oral health and psychological wellbeing. Gerodontics. 1987; 3:109-12.

Tang ATH, Li J, Ekstrand J, Liu Y. Cytotoxicity tests of in situ polymerized resins: methodological comparisons and introduction of a tissue culture insert as a testing deice. J Biomed Mater Res. 1999; 45:214-22.

Park JB. Biomaterials. In: Bronzino JD, editor. Biomedical engineering handbook. Boca Raton: CRC Press and IEEE Press; 1995. p.530–610.

Beall JR. Wear of acrylic resin teeth. J Am Dent Assoc. 1943; 30:252-56.

Appelbaum M. Theories of posterior tooth selection: porcelain versus acrylic. Dent Clin North Am. 1984; 28:299-306.

Craig RG, O’Brien WJ, Powers JM. Plásticos em Prótese. In: Craig RG, O’Brien WJ, Powers JM, editors. Materiais dentários: propriedades e manipulação. Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara Koogan; 1988. p.169-84.

Winkler S, Monasky GE, Kwok J. Laboratory wear investigation of resin posterior denture teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1992; 67:812-4.

Hirano S, May KB, Wagner WC, Haker CH. In vitro wear of resin denture teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1998; 2:152-5.

Kawano F, Ohguri T, Ichikawa T, Mizuno I, Hasegawa A. Shock absorbability and hardness of commercially available denture teeth. Int J Prosthodont. 2002; 15:243-7.

Neyndorff HC, Bartel DL, Tufaro F, Levy JG. Development of a model to demonstrate photosensitizer-mediated viral inactivation in blood. Transfusion. 1990; 30:485-90.

Anusavice, KJ. Phillips materiais dentários. 11nd ed. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier; 2005.

Harrison A, Huggett R. Effect of the curing cycle on residual monomer levels of acrylic resin denture base polymers. J Dent. 1992; 20:370-4.

Lefebvre CA, Knoernschild KL, Schuster GS. Cytotoxicity of eluates from light-polymerized denture base resins. J Prosthet Dent. 1994; 72:644-50.

Schuster GS, Lefebvre CA, Dirksen TR, Knoernschild KL, Caughman GB. Relationships between denture base resin cytotoxicity and cell lipid metabolism. Int J Prosthodont. 1995; 8:580- 6.

Tsuchiya H, Hoshino Y, Tajima K, Takagi N. Leaching and cytotoxicity of formaldehyde and methyl methacrylate from acrylic resin denture base materials. J Prosthet Dent. 1994; 71:618-24.

Wennberg A. Biological evaluation of root canal antiseptics using in vitro and in vivo methods. Scand J Dent Res. 1980; 88:46-52.

Campanha NH, Pavarina AC, Giampaolo ET, Machado AL, Carlos IZ, Vergani CE. Cytotoxicity of hard chairside reline resins: effect of microwave irradiation and water bath postpolymerization treatments. Int J Prosthodont. 2006; 19:195-201.

Jorge JH, Giampaolo ET, Vergani CE, Pavarina AC, Machado AL, Carlos IZ. Effect of microwave postpolymerization treatment and of storage time in water on the cytotoxicity of denture base and reline acrylic resins. Quintessence Int. 2009; 40:93-100.

Shim JS, Watts DC. Residual monomer concentrations in denture-base acrylic resin after an additional, soft-liner, heat-cure cycle. Dent Mater. 1999; 15:296-300.

Sheridan PJ, Koka S, Ewoldsen NO, Lefebvre CA, Lavin MT. Cytotoxicity of denture base resins. Int J Prosthodont. 1997; 10:73-7.

Vallittu PK, Miettinen V, Alakuijala P. Residual monomer content and its release into water from denture base materials. Dent Mater. 1995; 11:338- 42.

Bagis YH, Rueggeberg FA. The effect of post- cure heating on residual, unreacted monomer in a commercial resin composite. Dent Mater. 2000; 16:244-7.

Published

2016-06-10

How to Cite

Gusmão, J. M. R., Pithon, M. M., Santos, R. L. dos, & Romanos, M. T. V. (2016). In vitro evaluation of cytotoxicity of different brands of artificial teeth. Arquivos Em Odontologia, 48(3). https://doi.org/10.7308/aodontol/2012.48.3.01

Issue

Section

Artigos

Most read articles by the same author(s)