(Jensenius et al. 2010, 19). “Genuine gestures,” however, are movements that “carry expression and
meaning” (Leman and Godøy 2010, 5). That is, they are “physical displacement[s] of an object in space” that
are mentally activated (Jensenius et al. 2010, 13) after being “imagined and anticipated” (Leman and Godøy
2010, 5). Their primary intention in music is to control an instrument or coordinate actions among musicians
(conducting gestures).
An instrumental gesture – or “effective gesture” for Delalande (1988 apud Cadoz and Wanderley 2000, 78)
– is a genuine gesture that controls an instrument. For Cadoz and Wanderley (2000. 79),
it is applied to a material object and there exists physical interaction with it; in this physical
interaction, specific (physical) phenomena are produced, whose forms and dynamic
evolution can be mastered by the subject; these phenomena may then become the support
for communicational messages and/or be the basis for the production of a material action.
Table 6 presents Cadoz’s classification of instrumental gestures, which is based on their function. An
excitation gesture employs a sound production mode in a certain way – for example, dropping a marble on
a bar is an instantaneous excitation gesture that involves striking the bar using the force of gravity. Rubbing
a marble or the butt end of a mallet on the surface of a bar is a continuous excitation gesture with continuous
excitation, but if the bar is scraped with the mallet’s butt end, there may be a sequence of discrete
excitations. An excitation gesture may be interrupted after its “prefix”, before its “excitation phase” and
“suffix” take place (see Godøy 2008 apud Jensenius et al. 2010, 22), thus ending in silence – a “disjointed
attack” for Tolentino (n.d. apud Aroso 2020, 87), which is mainly visual and acquires full significance in a
performative context, as we shall discuss below.
Modification and selection gestures are the other gestures involved in sound production. For example, the
pitch bend (dragging a mallet from a node to its center after the bar is struck with another mallet) is a
parametric modification gesture with a continuous variation of the parameter pitch. An example of a
structural modification gesture is sticking plasticine to a bar, which changes its pitch, its resonance and its
timbre. If we consider the object that excites the bars a part of the instrument, the choice of using different
mallets in each hand to play single notes is an example of a sequential selection gesture. A parallel selection
gesture is for example choosing to play at a bar’s outer edge and center at the same time, as in the
marimshot. In many cases, two or more of the proposed functions combine in different degrees giving rise
to another [higher-level] instrumental gesture, as Cadoz and Wanderley (2000, 79) point out. For example,
rubbing the surface of a bar transversally with a mallet and continuing to the neighboring bar leads to striking
the latter on its lateral edge; continuing this gesture along several bars results in a glissando. Combined
within a musical context, instrumental gestures give rise to "a series of pitches, timbres, durations, and other
musical parameters,” thus making up compositional gestures (Baschet 2013, 24).
The secondary intention of gesture is a subjective and context-dependent aspect: the meaning beyond that
of the primary intention (Leman and Godøy 2010). As Aroso (2020) stresses, a performative gesture
“presupposes significance of a meaning that involves more than just a physical movement” (83). That is, the
performative gesture is “closely tied to the display of meaningful energetic shaping” (Bertinetto 2025, 12).
The secondary intention of a gesture is imbued in the movement by what Delalande (1988 apud Cadoz and
Wanderley 2000, 78) calls a “figurative gesture”. This is a gesture that is “perceived by the audience but
without a clear correspondence to a physical movement”. It may stem from the performer during the