PUNTOS DE VISTA DE LA VERDAD: SOBRE EL CARÁCTER POLIFÓNICO DEL PENSAMIENTO PLATÓNICO

Authors

  • Cristián De Bravo Delorme Universidad de Sevilla

Keywords:

Diálogo, verdad, polifonía, perspectiva

Abstract

The following paper aims to highlight the polyphonic character of Platonic thought and to question the meaning of Plato's authorship. To assume, from obstinate modern prejudices, that Plato, like any modern writer, would have exposed his own doctrine, is to ignore the importance of the dramatic form of his thought. The testimony of the variety of interlocutors and points of view that take place in the different dialogues, invites us to pay attention to the complex plot of Platonic thought, whose variety of functions corresponds to the limits and scope of the discourse of those who, in a given moment and situation, cooperate in the dialogue

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ANNAS, J. “Platonic Ethics, Old and New”. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1981.
ARIETI, J. “A dramatic interpretation of Plato’s Phaedo”. Illinois Classic Studies XI, 1986, pp. 129-142.
ARISTÓTELES. “Art of Rhetoric”. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 2006.
BURKERT, W. “Lore and Science in Ancient Pythagoreanism”. Translated by E. L. Minar Jr. Cambridge MA: Cambridge University Press, 1972.
BURNET, J. “Platonis Opera”, Oxford: Oxford Clarendon Press, 1900-1907.
CICERÓN. “Cuestiones académicas”. Versión de Julio Pimentel Álvarez, México: Universidad nacional autónoma de México, 1990.
DIOGENES LAERCIO. “Lives of Eminent Philosophers”. Vol. I. Translated by R. D. Hicks. Loeb Classical Library, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1925.
EUBEN, J. P. “Reading democracy: ‘Socratic dialogues and the political education of democratic citizens”. In: J. Ober and C. Hedrick (eds), Dêmokratia, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996, pp. 327-359.
FRIED, G, “Back to the Cave: A Platonic Rejoinder to Heidegger”. In: D. Hyland and J. P. Manoussakis (eds.). Heidegger and the Greeks. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2006, pp. 157-176.
GONZÁLEZ, F. “Plato’s Perspectivism”. Plato Journal 16. Coimbra: Coimbra University Press, 2017.
HEIDEGGER, M. “Sein und Zeit”. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag, 1976.
HEIDEGGER, M. “Phänomenologische Interpretationen zu Aristoteles/Einführung in die Phänomenologische Forschung”. GA 61, Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1992.
HUFFMAN, C. (ed.) “A History of Pythagoreanism”. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.
KAHN, C. “The philosophical importance of the dialogue form for Plato”. In: J. Fink (ed.). The development of dialectic form Plato to Aristotle, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
KANT, I. “¿Qué es la Ilustración?”. Traducción de R. Aramayo. Madrid: Alianza editorial, 2013.
KARAMANOLIS, G. “Plato and Aristotle in agreement?” Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.
KOSMAN, L. A. “Charmides’ first definition: sophrosyne as quietness”. In: J. P. Anton and A. Preuss (eds.), Essays in Ancient Greek Philosophy, Vol. 2, Albany: State University of New York Press, 1983, pp. 203-216.
LAYNE, D. “The character of Socrates and the good of dialogue form: Neoplatonic hermeneutics”. In: H. Tarrant and D. Layne (eds.), The Neoplatonic Socrates, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2014.
MAESTRO, J. G. “Contra las Musas de la Ira. El Materialismo Filosófico como Teoría de la Literatura”. Oviedo: Pentalfa ediciones, 2014.
MONOSON, S. “Plato’s Democratic Entanglements”.Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000.
NIETZSCHE. F. “Über das Verhältniss der Rede des Alcibiades zu den übrigen Reden des platonischen Symposions” (Traducción de Sergio Sánchez). In: Werke. Kritische Gesamtausgabe (KGW I, III), herausgegeben von G. Colli und M. Montinari, Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter, 2006.
NOVOTNÝ, F. “The Posthumous life of Plato”. The Hague: Martinus Nijhof, 1977.
PHILIP, J. “The Platonic Corpus”. Phoenix, Vol. 24, Nr. 4, 1970, pp. 296-308.
PLATÓN. “Diálogos” I-II, varios traductores. Madrid: Gredos, 2011.
PLATÓN. “Diálogos”VII, varios traductores. Madrid: Gredos, 1992.
PRESS, G. “Introduction”. In: G. Press (ed.), Who’s speak for Plato? Studies in Platonic Anonymity, Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, 2000.
POPKIN, R. The History of Scepticism, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.
PUCHNER, M. “The Drama of Ideas”. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.
REMES, P. “Neoplatonism”. Stocksfield. Acumen, 2008.
SCHMID, W. “On manly courage: A study of Plato’s Laches Philosophical Explorations”. Illinois: Southern Illinois University Press, 1992.
TARRANT, H. “Scepticism or Platonism?”. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.
TARRANT, H. “Plato’s first interpreters”. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2000.
THESLEFF, H. “Platonic Patterns”. Las Vegas: Parmenides Publishing, 2009.
TIGERSTEDT, E. N. “The Decline and Fall of the Neoplatonic Interpretation of Plato”. Helsinki: Societas Scientiaru Fennica, 1974.
TIGERSTEDT, E. N. “Interpreting Plato”. Stockholm Sweden: Almqvist & Wiksell International, 1977.
VALLEJO, A. “Platón. El filósofo de Atenas”. Barcelona: Montesinos, 1996.
VLASTOS, G. “Platonic Studies”. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1973.
VLASTOS, G. “Socrates. Ironist and Moral Philosopher”. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.
WESTERINK, I. “Anonymous Prolegomena to Platonic Philosophy”. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Co., 1962.
WOODBRIDGE, F. “The Son of Apollo. Themes of Plato”. Cambridge: The Riverside Press, 1879.

Published

2020-10-02

How to Cite

DE BRAVO DELORME, C. PUNTOS DE VISTA DE LA VERDAD: SOBRE EL CARÁCTER POLIFÓNICO DEL PENSAMIENTO PLATÓNICO. Revista Kriterion, [S. l.], v. 61, n. 145, 2020. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/article/view/25652. Acesso em: 3 jul. 2024.

Issue

Section

Artigos