Being Interactive in Applied Linguistics Research Articles

Towards Characterizing an Academic Writer’s Metadiscourse Style

Autores

Palavras-chave:

style, corpus linguistics, metadiscourse, interaction, linguistic features

Resumo

Having access to how prominent researchers write may enlighten how we deal with the challenging task of writing. Therefore, this article aims to unveil the interactive metadiscourse style of Douglas Biber’s style since he is one of the most cited scholars in our area. A Corpus Linguistics methodological framework is proposed by using AntConc to compile and compare a study corpus and a reference corpus. The data retrieved from this comparison is assessed following the Stylistic Metadiscourse Model of Interpersonal Interaction in Academic Writing. The results contribute to the understanding of how Biber crafts an authorial style that may empower novice and other expert writers to write research articles that involve readers in meaningful reading and writing experiences.

Downloads

Os dados de download ainda não estão disponíveis.

Referências

ANTHONY, L. AntConc [Computer Software]. Tokyo: Waseda University, 2022a. v. 4.2.0. Available at: https://www.laurenceanthony.net/software/antconc/. Accessed on: 25 Aug. 2025.

ANTHONY, L. AntConc (Windows, MacOS, Linux) Build 4.2.0 [Help Manual]. Tokyo: Waseda University, 2022b. Available at: https://www.laurenceanthony.net/software/antconc/releases/AntConc420/help.pdf Accessed on: 25 Aug. 2025.

BACON, N. Style in Academic Writing. In: DUNCAN, M.; VANGURI, S. M. (ed.). The Centrality of Style. Anderson: Parlor Press, 2013. p. 173-190.

BAKER, M. Towards a Methodology for Investigating the Style of a Literary Translator. Target, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, v. 12, n. 2, p. 241-266, 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/target.12.2.04bak.

BAKHTIN, M. The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays by m. M. Bakhtin. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1981.

BERBER SARDINHA, A. P. Comparing Corpora with Wordsmith Tools: How Large Must the Reference Corpus Be?. In: Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 38, 2000, Hong Kong. Proceedings of the Workshop on Comparing Corpora… Hong Kong: Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, 2000. p. 7-13.

BIBER, D. Investigating macroscopic textual variation through multifeature/multidimensional analyses. Linguistics, [S. I.], v. 23, n. 2, p. 337-360, 1985. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1985.23.2.337.

BIBER, D. On the investigation of spoken/written differences. Studia Linguistica, [S. I.], v. 40, n. 1, p. 1–21, 1986a. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9582.1986.tb00759.x.

BIBER, D. Spoken and written textual dimensions in English: resolving the contradictory findings. Language, [S. I.], v. 62, n. 2, p. 384-414, 1986b. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/414678.

BIBER, D. A textual comparison of British and American writing. American Speech, [S. I.], v. 62, n. 2, p. 99-119, 1987. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/455273.

BIBER, D. A typology of English texts. Linguistics, [S. I.], v. 27, n. 1, p. 3–44, 1989. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2013-0040

BIBER, D. On the complexity of discourse complexity: A multidimensional analysis. Discourse Processes, [S. I.], v. 15, n. 2, p. 133–163, 1992. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539209544806

BIBER, D. The multi-dimensional approach to linguistic analyses of genre variation: An overview of methodology and findings. Computers and the Humanities, [S. I.], v. 26, n. 5–6, p. 331–345, 1993a. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00136979.

BIBER, D. Co-occurrence patterns among collocations: a tool for corpus-based lexical knowledge acquisition. Computational Linguistics, [S. I.], v. 19, n. 3, p. 531–538, 1993b.

BIBER, D. Representativeness in Corpus Design. Literary and Linguistic Computing, [S. I.], v. 8, n. 4, p. 243-257, 1993c. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-585-35958-8_20.

BIBER, D. On the role of computational, statistical, and interpretive techniques in multi-dimensional analyses of register variation: A reply to Watson. Text & Talk, [S. I.], v. 15, n. 3, p. 341–370, 1995. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1995.15.3.341

BIBER, D. Investigating language use through corpus-based analyses of association patterns. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, [S. I.], v. 1, n. 2, p. 171–197, 1996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.1.2.02bib.

BIBER, D. A register perspective on grammar and discourse: variability in the form and use of English complement clauses. Discourse Studies, [S. I.], v. 1, n. 2, p. 131–150, 1999. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445699001002001.

BIBER, D. Historical patterns for the grammatical marking of stance: A cross-register comparison. Journal of Historical Pragmatics, [S. I.], v. 5, n. 1, p. 107–136, 2004. DOI: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.5.1.06bib.

BIBER, D. Corpus linguistics and the study of English grammar. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching, [S. I.], v. 1, n. 1, p. 1-22, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25170/ijelt.v1i1.1398.

BIBER, D. University Language: A Corpus-Based Study of Spoken and Written Registers. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2006a.

BIBER, D. Stance in spoken and written university registers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, [S. I.], v. 5, n. 2, p. 97–116, 2006b. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2006.05.001.

BIBER, D. A corpus-driven approach to formulaic language in English: Multi-word patterns in speech and writing. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, [S. I.], v. 14, n. 3, p. 275–311, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.14.3.08bib

BIBER, D. Corpus linguistics and the study of literature: Back to the future?. Scientific Study of Literature, [S. I.], v. 1, n. 1, p. 15–23, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.1.1.02bib.

BIBER, Douglas. Interview with Douglas Biber. [Interview given to] Bethany Gray. Journal of English Linguistics, Thousand Oaks, v. 41, n. 4, p. 359-379, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424213502237.

BIBER, D. Text-linguistic approaches to register variation. Register Studies, [S. I.], v. 1, n. 1, p. 42–75, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/rs.18007.bib.

BIBER, D et al. Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2021.

BIBER, D. Home. Arizona: Northern Arizona University, [201-?]. Available at: https://dougbiber.weebly.com/. Accessed on: 17 June 2024.

BREZINA, V. Statistics in Corpus Linguistics: A Practical Guide. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press, 2018.

BURKE, M. Rhetoric and Poetics: The Classical Heritage of Stylistics. In: BURKE, M. (ed.). The Routledge Handbook of Stylistics. London/New York: Routledge, 2014. p. 11-30.

CÂMARA JUNIOR, J. M. Contribuição à estilística portuguesa. 3. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Ao livro técnico, 1978.

CLARIVATE. Journal Citation Reports. London: Clarivate, 2023.

CRISMORE, A. Metadiscourse: What Is It and How Is It Used in School and Non-School Social Science Texts. Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois, 1983.

CRYSTAL, D. Stylistic Profiling. In: AIJMER, K.; ALTENBERG, B. (ed.). English Corpus Stylistics: Studies in Honour of Jan Svartvik. New York/London: Routledge, 2013. p. 221-238.

E.G. In: AMERICAN HERITAGE DICTIONARY OF THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE. 5. ed. New York: HarperCollins Publishers LLC, 2011. Available at: https://www.thefreedictionary.com/e.g. Accessed on: 25 Aug. 2025.

FRANKENBERG-GARCIA, A. Investigating the Collocations Available to EAP Writers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, Amsterdam, v. 35, p. 93-104, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2018.07.003.

GARCIA, O. M. Comunicação em prosa moderna: aprenda a escrever, aprendendo a pensar. 26. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Editora FGV, 2006.

GRAY, B. Linguistic Variation in Research Articles: When Discipline Tells Only Part of The Story. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2015.

GRIEVE, J. Register Variation Explains Stylometric Authorship Analysis. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, Berlin, v. 19, n. 1, 1-31, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2022-0040.

HYLAND, K. Academic Discourse: English in a Global Context. London/New York: Continuum International Publishing Group, 2009.

HYLAND, K. As Can Be Seen: Lexical Bundles and Disciplinary Variation. English for Specific Purposes, Amsterdam, v. 27, n. 1, p. 4-21, 2008a. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2007.06.001.

HYLAND, K. Authority and Invisibility: Authorial Identity in Academic Writing. Journal of Pragmatics, Amsterdam, v. 34, p. 1091-1112, 2002b. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00035-8.

HYLAND, K. Community and Individuality: Performing Identity in Applied Linguistics. Written Communication, Thousand Oaks, v. 27, n. 2, p. 159-188, 2010. DOI: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0741088309357846.

HYLAND, K. Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 2004.

HYLAND, K. Humble Servants of The Discipline?: Self-Mention In Research Articles. English for Specific Purposes, Amsterdam, v. 20, n. 3, p. 207-226, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(00)00012-0.

HYLAND, K. Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in writing. London/New York: Continuum International Publishing Group, 2005.

HYLAND, K. Options of Identity in Academic Writing. ELT Journal, Oxford, v. 56, n. 4, p. 351-358, 2002a. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/56.4.351.

HYLAND, K. Small Bits of Textual Material: A Discourse Analysis of Swales’ Writing. English for Specific Purposes, Amsterdam, v. 27, n. 2, p. 143-160, 2008b. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2006.10.005.

HYLAND, K; TSE, P. Metadiscourse in Academic Writing: A Reappraisal. Applied Linguistics, Oxford, v. 25, n. 2, p. 156-77, 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/25.2.156.

HYLAND, K.; JIANG, F. (Kevin). Academic Discourse and Global Publishing: Disciplinary Persuasion in Changing Times. London/New York: Routledge, 2019.

I.E. In: AMERICAN HERITAGE DICTIONARY OF THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE. 5. ed. New York: HarperCollins Publishers LLC, 2011. Available at: https://www.thefreedictionary.com/i.e. Accessed on: 25 Aug. 2025.

I LOVE PDF. [S. l.: s. n], 2025. Available at: https://www.ilovepdf.com/ Accessed on: 25 Aug. 2025.

IVANIČ, R. Writing and Identity: The Discoursal Construction of Identity in Academic Writing. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing, 1998.

JEFFRIES, L.; MCINTYRE, D. Stylistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.

LEECH, G.; SHORT, M. Style in Fiction: A Linguistic Introduction to English Fictional Prose. Harlow: Pearson; Longman, 2007.

LILLIS, T.; CURRY, M. J. Academic Writing in A Global Context: The Politics and Practices of Publishing in English. London; New York: Routledge, 2010.

MALMKJAER, K.; CARTER, R. Stylistics. In: MALMKJAER, K. (ed.). The Linguistics Encyclopedia. 2. ed. London/New York: Routledge, 2002. p. 510-520.

MCINTYRE, D.; WALKER, B. Corpus Stylistics: Theory and Practice. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press Ltd., 2019.

MCMENAMIN, G. R. (ed.). Forensic Linguistics: Advances in Forensic Stylistics. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2002.

ONLINE 2 PDF. Conversor PDF online. [S. l.: s. n], 2007. Available at: https://online2pdf.com/ Accessed on: 25 Aug. 2025.

OCR2EDIT. OCR2Edit - Extract text from scans, images and more. [S. l.: s. n], 2025. Available at: https://www.ocr2edit.com/. Accessed on: 25 Aug. 2025.

PEARSON, W. S.; ABDOLLAHZADEH, E. Metadiscourse in Academic Writing: A Systematic Review. Lingua, Amsterdam, v. 263, p. 1-32, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2023.103561.

SCOTT, M. WordSmith Tools Manual. Stroud: Lexical Analysis Software Ltd., 2022. Available at: https://lexically.net/downloads/version_64_8/HTML/index.html . Accessed on: 25 Aug. 2025.

SCOTT, M.; TRIBBLE, C. Textual Patterns: Key Words and Corpus Analysis in Language Education. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2006.

SILVA, J. M. V. (Un)surprisingly, Style Can Be Found in Academic Writing: Towards Characterizing Douglas Biber’s Metadiscourse Style. 2024. Dissertation (Ph.D. in Linguistic Studies) – Faculdade de Letras, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, 2024.

SWALES, J. M. Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.

TARDY, C. Current Conceptions of Voice. In: HYLAND, K.; GUINDA, C. (ed.). Stance and Voice in Written Academic Genres. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012. p. 34-47.

THOMPSON, G. Interaction in Academic Writing: Learning to Argue with the Reader. Applied Linguistics, Oxford, v. 22, n. 1, p. 58-78, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/22.1.58.

THOMPSON, G.; THETELA, P. The Sound of One Hand Clapping: The Management of Interaction in Written Discourse. TEXT, Berlin, v. 15, n. 1, 103-27, 1995. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.1515/text.1.1995.15.1.103.

TOGNINI-BONELLI, E. Corpus Linguistics at Work. Amsterdam/Birmingham: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2001.

VANDE KOPPLE, W. Some Exploratory Discourse on Metadiscourse. College Composition and Communication, New York; Ann Arbor, v. 36, n. 1, p. 82-93, 1985. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/357609.

Downloads

Publicado

09-12-2025

Edição

Seção

Número Temático - Corpus Linguistics: Studies and Applications (lançamento em 2025)