“Strikingly”, an Academic Writer’s Style Can Be Interactional
Towards Characterizing Metadiscourse Style in Applied Linguistics Research Articles
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17851/2237-2083.34.1.393-422Palabras clave:
Style, metadiscourse, interaction, corpus linguistics, linguistic featuresResumen
This paper aims at unveiling the interactional metadiscourse style of a prominent applied linguist, Douglas Biber. Comparisons are made between 25 of his research articles (RAs) to 126 RAs written by other applied linguists. In this work, a Corpus Linguistics (CL) methodological framework is proposed by using AntConc tools. The results show that the author’s interactional stylistic choices convey levels of certainty and uncertainty about his propositions; make his views explicit, comment on the message, and express evaluations (importance and suitability) and emotions (surprise); and directly involve readers in the ongoing discourse by overtly pointing them to other parts in the RAs. Strikingly, Biber’s interactional rhetorical practices are essentially evaluative and engaging, expressing solidarity, anticipating objections, and revealing the extent to which he works to jointly construct texts with his readers. As a result, the author’s tendency to pursue an interactional metadiscourse style reveals how an expert academic writer crafts an authorial style that may empower novice and other expert writers to craft a style that involves the audience in meaningful reading and writing experiences through academic texts.
Referencias
ANTHONY, L. AntConc (Version 4.2.0) [Computer Software]. Tokyo: Waseda University, 2022. Available at: https://www.laurenceanthony.net/software/antconc/ . Accessed on: 11 Nov. 2025.
BACON, N. Style in academic writing. In: DUNCAN, M.; VANGURI, S. M. (ed.). The centrality of style. Anderson: Parlor Press, 2013. p. 173-190.
BAKER, M. Towards a methodology for investigating the style of a literary translator. Target, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, v. 12, n. 2, p. 241-266, 2000. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1075/target.12.2.04bak
BAKHTIN, M. The dialogic imagination: four essays by M. M. Bakhtin. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1981.
BERBER SARDINHA, A. P. Comparing Corpora with Wordsmith Tools: How Large Must the Reference Corpus Be?. In: Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 38, 2000, Hong Kong. Proceedings of the Workshop on Comparing Corpora… Hong Kong: Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, 2000. p. 7-13.
BERBER SARDINHA, A. P. Lingüística de corpus. Barueri: Manole, 2004.
BIBER, D. et al. Grammar of spoken and written English. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2021.
BIBER, D. A textual comparison of British and American writing. American Speech, [S. I.], v. 62, n. 2, p. 99-119, 1987. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/455273
BIBER, D. Methodological issues regarding corpus-based analyses of linguistic variation. Literary and Linguistic Computing, [S. I.], v. 5, n. 4, p. 257–269, 1990. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/5.4.257
BIBER, D. On the complexity of discourse complexity: A multidimensional analysis. Discourse Processes, [S. I.], v. 15, n. 2, p. 133–163, 1992. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539209544806
BIBER, D. Representativeness in Corpus Design. Literary and Linguistic Computing, [S. I.], v. 8, n. 4, p. 243-257, 1993a. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-585-35958-8_20
BIBER, D. Using register-diversified corpora for general language studies. Computational Linguistics, [S. I.], v. 19, n. 2, p. 219–241, 1993b.
BIBER, D. Investigating language use through corpus-based analyses of association patterns. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, [S. I.], v. 1, n. 2, p. 171–197, 1996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.1.2.02bib
BIBER, D. A register perspective on grammar and discourse: variability in the form and use of English complement clauses. Discourse Studies, [S. I.], v. 1, n. 2, p. 131–150, 1999. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/146 1445699001002001
BIBER, D. Historical patterns for the grammatical marking of stance: A cross-register comparison. Journal of Historical Pragmatics, [S. I.], v. 5, n. 1, p. 107–136, 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.5.1.06bib:
BIBER, D. University language: A corpus-based study of spoken and written registers. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2006.
BIBER, D. A corpus-driven approach to formulaic language in English: Multi-word patterns in speech and writing. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, [S. I.], v. 14, n. 3, p. 275–311, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.14.3.08bib
BIBER, D. Corpus linguistics and the study of literature: Back to the future?. Scientific Study of Literature, [S. I.], v. 1, n. 1, p. 15–23, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.1.1.02bib
BIBER, D. Register as a predictor of linguistic variation. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, [S. I.], v. 8, n. 1, p. 9–37, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2012-0002
BIBER, D. Interview with Douglas Biber. [Interview given to] Bethany Gray. Journal of English Linguistics, Thousand Oaks, v. 41, n. 4, p. 359-379, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424213502237
BIBER, D. Using multi-dimensional analysis to explore cross-linguistic universals of register variation. Languages in Contrast, [S. I.], v. 14, n. 1, p. 7–34, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/lic.14.1.02bib
BIBER, D. Text-linguistic approaches to register variation. Register Studies, [S. I.], v. 1, n. 1, p. 42–75, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/rs.18007.bib
BIBER, D. Home. Arizona: Northern Arizona University, [201-?]. Available at: https://dougbiber.weebly.com/. Accessed on: 11 Nov. 2025.
BIBER, D.; CONRAD, S. Register, genre, and style. 2. ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019.
BIBER, D.; GRAY, B. Grammatical complexity in academic English: linguistic change in writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.
BREZINA, V. Statistics in corpus linguistics: a practical guide. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press, 2018.
BURKE, M. Rhetoric and poetics: The classical heritage of stylistics. In: BURKE, M. (ed.). The Routledge Handbook of Stylistics. London/New York: Routledge, 2014. p. 11-30.
CÂMARA JUNIOR, J. M. Contribuição à estilística portuguesa. 3. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Ao livro técnico, 1978.
CLARIVATE. Journal Citation Reports. London: Clarivate, 2023.
CRISMORE, A. Metadiscourse: what is it and how is it used in school and non-school social science texts. Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois, 1983.
GARCIA, O. M. Comunicação em prosa moderna: aprenda a escrever, aprendendo a pensar. 26. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Editora FGV, 2006.
GELUSO, J.; HIRCH, R. The reference corpus matters: comparing the effect of different reference corpora on keyword analysis. Register Studies, Amsterdam/Birmingham, v. 1, n. 2, p. 209–242, 2019.
GRAY, B. Linguistic variation in research articles: when discipline tells only part of the story. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2015.
GRIEVE, J. Register variation explains stylometric authorship analysis. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, Berlin, v. 19, n. 1, 1-31, 2023.
HYLAND, K. The scholarly publishing landscape. In: HANGANU-BRESCH, C.; ZERBE, M. J.; CUTRUFELLO, G.; MACI, S. M. (ed.). The Routledge handbook of scientific communication. London/New York: Routledge, 2022. p. 15-25.
HYLAND, K. Community and individuality: performing identity in applied linguistics. Written Communication, Thousand Oaks, v. 27, n. 2, p. 159-188, 2010.
HYLAND, K. Academic Discourse: English in a global context. London/New York: Continuum International Publishing Group, 2009.
HYLAND, K. As can be seen: Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation. English for Specific Purposes, Amsterdam, v. 27, n. 1, p. 4-21, 2008a.
HYLAND, K. Small bits of textual material: A discourse analysis of Swales’ writing. English for Specific Purposes, Amsterdam, v. 27, n. 2, p. 143-160, 2008b.
HYLAND, K. Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in writing. London/New York: Continuum International Publishing Group, 2005.
HYLAND, K. Disciplinary discourses: social interactions in academic writing. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 2004.
HYLAND, K. Authority and invisibility: authorial identity in academic writing. Journal of Pragmatics, Amsterdam, v. 34, p. 1091-1112, 2002b. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00035-8
HYLAND, K. Options of identity in academic writing. ELT Journal Volume, Oxford, v. 56, n. 4, p. 351-358, 2002a. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/56.4.351
HYLAND, K. Hedging in scientific research articles. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 1998a.
HYLAND, K. Boosting, hedging and the negotiation of academic knowledge. Text, Berlin, v. 18, n. 3, p. 349-382, 1998b.
HYLAND, K; TSE, P. Metadiscourse in academic writing: a reappraisal. Applied Linguistics, Oxford, v. 25, n. 2, p. 156-77, 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/25.2.156
HYLAND, K.; JIANG, F. (K.). Academic discourse and global publishing: disciplinary persuasion in changing times. London/New York: Routledge, 2019.
I LOVE PDF. [S. l.: s. n], 2025. Available at: https://www.ilovepdf.com/ Accessed on: 11 Nov. 2025.
IVANIČ, R. Writing and identity: the discoursal construction of identity in academic writing. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing, 1998.
JEFFRIES, L.; MCINTYRE, D. Stylistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
LEECH, G.; SHORT, M. Style in fiction: a linguistic introduction to English fictional prose. Harlow: Pearson/Longman, 2007.
LILLIS, T.; CURRY, M. Academic writing in a global context: the politics and practices of publishing in English. London/New York: Routledge, 2010.
MALMKJAER, K.; CARTER, R. Stylistics. In: MALMKJAER, K. (ed.) The linguistics encyclopedia. 2. ed. London/New York: Routledge, 2002. p. 510-520.
MCINTYRE, D.; WALKER, B. Corpus stylistics: theory and practice. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press Ltd, 2019.
MCMENAMIN, G. R. (ed.) Forensic Linguistics: advances in forensic stylistics. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2002.
ONLINE 2 PDF. Conversor PDF online. [S. l.: s. n], 2007. Available at: https://online2pdf.com/ Accessed on: 11 Nov. 2025.
OCR2EDIT. OCR2Edit - Extract text from scans, images and more. [S. l.: s. n], 2025. Available at: https://www.ocr2edit.com/ Accessed on: 11 Nov. 2025.
PEARSON, W. S.; ABDOLLAHZADEH, E. Metadiscourse in academic writing: a systematic review. Lingua, Amsterdam, v. 263, p. 1-32, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2023.103561
POJANAPUNYA, P.; WATSON TODD, R. Log-likelihood and odds ratio: Keyness statistics for different purposes of keyword analysis. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, Berlin, v. 14, n. 1, 133-167, 2016. DOI: 10.1515/cllt-2015-0030
SCOTT, M. WordSmith Tools manual. Stroud: Lexical Analysis Software Ltd., 2022. Available at: https://lexically.net/downloads/version_64_8/HTML/index.html . Accessed on: 11 Nov. 2025.
SCOTT, M.; TRIBBLE, C. Textual patterns: key words and corpus analysis in language education. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2006.
SILVA, J. M. V. (Un)surprisingly, style can be found in academic writing: towards characterizing Douglas Biber’s metadiscourse style. 2024. 176f. Dissertation (Ph.D. in Linguistic Studies) – Faculdade de Letras, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, 2024.
SILVA, J. M. V. Being Interactive in Applied Linguistics Research Articles: Towards Characterizing an Academic Writer’s Metadiscourse Style. Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada, Belo Horizonte, v. 25, n. 1, p. 1-29, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-6398202549625
SINCLAIR, J. Trust the text: language corpus and discourse. London: Routledge, 2004.
SWALES, J. M. Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
TARDY, C. Current conceptions of voice. In: HYLAND, K.; GUINDA, C. (ed.). Stance and voice in written academic genres. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012. p. 34-47.
THOMPSON, G. Interaction in academic writing: learning to argue with the reader. Applied Linguistics, Oxford, v. 22, n. 1, p. 58-78, 2001.
THOMPSON, G.; THETELA, P. The sound of one hand clapping: the management of interaction in written discourse. TEXT, Berlin, v. 15, n. 1, 103-27, 1995. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1995.15.1.103
TOGNINI-BONELLI, E. Corpus linguistics at work. Amsterdam/Birmingham: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2001.
VANDE KOPPLE, W. Some exploratory discourse on metadiscourse. College Composition and Communication, New York/ Ann Arbor, v. 36, n. 1, p. 82-93, 1985. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/357609
WALTMAN, L.; TRAAG, V. A. Use of the journal impact factor for assessing individual articles: Statistically flawed or not? F1000Research, London, v. 9, p. 1-29, 2000.
