How Do Oral Deaf Individuals Comprehend Primary Metaphors and Idioms? Let’s Begin to Dot the I’s and Cross the T’s

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17851/2237-2083.33.3.114-131

Palavras-chave:

figurative language comprehension, primary metaphor, idioms, deafness, cognitive linguistics

Resumo

Oral deaf people (i.e., people with hearing loss who have learned an oral language) are typically less exposed to auditory and linguistic input than normal hearing peers and might struggle with figurative language comprehension. Our aim is to investigate primary metaphor and idiom comprehension by oral deaf who use hearing amplification devices or cochlear implants. To this end, we used a verbal primary metaphor task, a non-verbal primary metaphor task and an idiom comprehension task. One hundred fifty-one participants took part in the study (57 oral deaf and 97 normal hearing individuals, subdivided into three age levels). Results show that comprehension follows an improvement pattern as participants’ age increases in both experimental and control groups. For the oral deaf individuals, a delay was found for all verbal tasks. For the non-verbal metaphor task, only kids differed statistically, with the oral deaf children performing worse than their counterparts. In conclusion, figurative language comprehension can be more challenging for oral deaf individuals when presented verbally than non-verbally, particularly from adolescence onwards, in comparison to normal hearing peers. This study contributes to informing clinicians and educators about comprehension of primary metaphors and idioms in oral deaf individuals, which may help to identify language impairments and create interventions for figurative language comprehension. 

Referências

AFONSO, N. Compreensão de metáforas primárias e deficiência auditiva. 2012. Dissertação. (Mestrado em Ciências da Fala e da Audição) - Universidade de Aveiro, 2012.

BAHRAMI, H.; FARAMARZI, S.; AMOUZADEH, M. A comparative study of metaphorical expression understanding between children with cochlear implants and normal children. Aud Vestib Res, Tehran, v. 27, n. 3, p. 131-136, 2018.

BEFI-LOPES, D. Vocabulário ABFW: teste de linguagem infantil nas áreas de fonologia, vocabulário, fluência e pragmática. São Paulo: Pró-Fono, 2004.

BOERS, F.; DEMECHELEER, M. Measuring the impact of cross-cultural differences on learners’ comprehension of imageable idioms. ELT Journal, Oxford, v. 55, n. 3, p. 255-262, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/55.3.255

BOERS, F.; DEMECHELEER, M.; EYCKMANS, J. Cross-cultural variation as a variable in comprehending and remembering figurative idioms. European Journal of English Studies, London, v. 8, n. 3, p. 375-388, 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1382557042000277449

BORODITSKY, L. Metaphoric structuring: understanding time through spatial metaphors. Cognition, London, v. 75, n. 1, p. 1-28, 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00073-6

CAIN, K.; TOWSE, A. S.; KNIGHT, R. S. The development of idiom comprehension: an investigation of semantic and contextual processing skills. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, Amsterdam, v. 102, n. 3, p. 280-298, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2008.08.001

CARROL, G.; LITLEMORE, J. Resolving figurative expressions during reading: the role of familiarity, transparency, and context. Discourse Processes, London, v. 57, n. 7, p. 609-626, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2020.1729041

CITRON, F. M. M.; GOLDBERG, A. E. Metaphorical sentences are more emotionally engaging than their literal counterparts. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, Madison, v. 26, p. 2585-2595, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00654

DAHLBY-SKOOG, M..; KALANDADZE, T.; KARLTORP, E.; LYXELL, B.; LÖFKVIST, U. Hearing Early Opens More Doors: Long-Term Effects of Age at Implantation on Metaphor Comprehension in Adolescents and Young Adults With Cochlear Implants. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, v. 68, n. 3, p. 1105-1125, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1044/2024_jslhr-24-00480

DESAI, R. H.; BINDER, J.; CONANT, L.; MANO, Q.; SEIDENBERG, M. S. The neural career of sensory-motor metaphors. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, Madison, v. 23, n. 9, p. 2376-2386, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2010.21596

DI PAOLA, S.; DOMANESCHI, F.; POUSCOULOUS, N. Metaphorical developing minds: the role of multiple factors in the development of metaphor comprehension. Journal of Pragmatics, Amsterdam, v. 156, p. 235-251, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.08.008

DO, L. G.; CHUNG, I. Comprehension of figurative language by hearing impaired children in special primary schools. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Amsterdam, v. 191, p. 506-511, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.448

EDWARDS, L.; MARSCHARK, M.; KRONENBERGER, W. G.; CROWE, K.; WALTON, D. Inferencing abilities of deaf college students: foundations and implications for metaphor comprehension and theory of mind. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, New York, v. 33, p. 233-258, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-020-09746-w

GALLESE, V.; LAKOFF, G. The brain’s concepts: the role of the sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsychology, London, v. 22, n. 3-4, p. 455-479, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02643290442000310

GEERS, A.; MOOG, J.; BIEDENSTEIN, J.; BRENNER, C.; HAYES, H. Spoken language scores of children using cochlear implants compared to hearing age-mates at school entry. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, Oxford, v. 14, n. 3, p. 371–385, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/enn046

GIBBS, R.; NAYAK, N. P.; CUTTING, C. How to kick the bucket and not decompose: analyzability and idiom processing. Journal of Memory and Language, Amsterdam, v. 28, n. 5, p. 576-593, 1989. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(89)90014-4

GIBBS, R. Semantic analyzability in children’s understanding of idioms. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, Rockville, v. 34, n. 3, p. 613-620, 1991. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3403.613

GIBBS, R.; COLSTON, H. L. Interpreting figurative meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139168779

GOLD, R.; SEGAL, O. Metaphor comprehension by deaf young adults. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, Oxford, v. 22, n. 3, p. 316-325, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/enx010

GRADY, J. Foundations of meaning: primary metaphors and primary stress. 1997. 306f. Tese (Doutorado em Linguística) – University of California, Berkeley, 1997.

LACEY, S.; STILLA, R.; SATHIAN, K. Metaphorically feeling: comprehending textural metaphors activates somatosensory cortex. Brain and Language, Amsterdam, v. 120, p. 416–421, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2011.12.016

LAKOFF, G.; JOHNSON, M. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980.

LAKOFF, G. Mapping the brain’s metaphor circuitry: metaphorical thought in everyday reason. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, Lausanne, v. 8, p. 958, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00958

LANGLOTZ, A. Idiomatic creativity: a cognitive-linguistic model of idiom-representation and idiom-variation in English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2006.

LAW, J. Identificação precoce dos distúrbios da linguagem na criança. Rio de Janeiro: Revinter, 2001.

LEVORATO, M. C. The acquisition of idioms and the development of figurative competence. In: CACCIARI, C.; TABOSSI, P. (Eds.). Idioms: processing, structure, and interpretation. Taylor & Francis, 1993. p. 101-128.

LEVORATO, M.; CACCIARI, C. The effects of different tasks on the comprehension and production of idioms in children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, Amsterdam, v. 60, n. 2, p. 261-283, 1995. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/jecp.1995.1041

LIBBEN, M.; TITONE, D. The multidetermined nature of idiom processing. Memory and Cognition, Chicago, v. 36, n. 6, p. 1103–1121, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.36.6.1103

NICASTRI, M.; FILIPO, R.; RUOPPOLO, G.; VICCARO, M.; DINCR, H.; GUERZONI, L.; MANCINI, P. Inferences and metaphoric comprehension in unilaterally implanted children with adequate formal oral language performance. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, Amsterdam, v. 78, n. 5, p. 821-827, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2014.02.022

NIPPOLD, M. A.; TAYLOR, C. L.; BAKER, J. M. Idiom understanding in Australian youth: a cross-cultural comparison. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, Rockville, v. 39, n. 2, p. 442-447, 1996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3902.442

ORLANDO, A.-M.; SHULMAN, B. B. Severe-to-profound hearing-impaired children’s comprehension of figurative language. Journal of Childhood Communication Disorders, Reston, v. 12, n. 2, p. 157-165, 1989.

RAVEN, J. C.; RAVEN, J.; COURT, J. H. Matrizes progressivas coloridas de Raven. São Paulo: Casa do Psicólogo, 1998.

RINALDI, P. et al. Linguistic and pragmatic skills in toddlers with cochlear implant. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, London, v. 48, n. 6, p. 715-725, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12046

RITTENHOUSE, R. K.; KENYON, P. L. Conservation and metaphor acquisition in hearing-impaired children: some relationships with communication mode, hearing acuity, schooling, and age. American Annals of the Deaf, Washington, v. 136, n. 4, p. 313-320, 1991.

SCHORR, E.; ROTH, F.; FOX, N. A. Comparison of the speech and language skills of children with cochlear implants and children with normal hearing. Communication Disorders Quarterly, Austin, v. 29, n. 4, p. 195-210, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1525740108321217

SIQUEIRA, Maity. As metáforas primárias na aquisição da linguagem: um estudo interlinguístico. 2004. Tese (Doutorado em Letras) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brasil, 2004.

SIQUEIRA, M.; GIBBS JR, R. W. Children’s Acquisition of Primary Metaphors: a crosslinguistic study. Organon, Porto Alegre, v. 21, n. 43, p. 161-179, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22456/2238-8915.39590

SIQUEIRA, M.; MARQUES, D. F.; GIBBS, JR, R. W. Metaphor-related figurative language comprehension in clinical populations: a critical review. Scripta, Belo Horizonte, v. 20, n. 40, p. 36, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5752/P.2358-3428.2016v20n40p36

SIQUEIRA, M.; DUARTE Jr, S.; BAIOCCO, L.; FERRARI, C. G.; LOPES, N. Compreensão de expressões idiomáticas em período de aquisição da linguagem. Letras de Hoje, Porto Alegre, v. 52, n. 3, p. 391–391, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-7726.2017.3.29371

SIQUEIRA, M.; MARQUES, D. F. Desenvolvimento e validação do instrumento de compreensão de expressões idiomáticas. Revista de Estudos da Linguagem, Belo Horizonte, v. 26, n. 2, p. 571-591, 2018. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17851/2237-2083.26.2.571-591

SIQUEIRA, M.; FERRARI, C. G.; RODRIGUES, J. C. ; BAIOCCO, L.; MELO, T.; DUARTE Jr, S.; MARQUES, D. Evidências de validade de Tarefas de Compreensão de Metáforas Primárias: uma revisão da literatura. Letrônica, Porto Alegre, v. 16, n. 1, e44362, 2023a. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-4301.2023.1.44362

SIQUEIRA, M.; MELO, T.; DUARTE Jr, S.; BAIOCCO, L.; FERRARI, C. G.; LOPES, N.. Many hands on this study: Development of a metonymy comprehension task. DELTA Documentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicada, São Paulo, v. 39, n. 3, 2023b. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-460X202339350607

SIQUEIRA, M., FERRARI, C. G. Children drink the whole bottle first and then cry over the spilled milk: Progress in the Understanding of Different Figurative Language Phenomena. In: WILD 2025: 7th Workshop on Infant Language Development, San Sebastian, Spain. Basque Center on Cognition, Brain and Language, 2025.

SPRENGER, S. A.; LA ROI, A.; VAN RIJ, J. The development of idiom knowledge across the lifespan. Frontiers in Communication, Lausenne, v. 4, p. 29, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2019.00029

TABOSSI, P.; FANARI, R.; WOLF, K. Why are idioms recognized fast? Memory & Cognition, Chicago, v. 37, n. 4, p. 529–540, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.37.4.529

TOMASELLO, M. Constructing a language: a usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2003.

VULCHANOVA, M.; VULCHANOV, V.; STANKOVA, M. Idiom comprehension in the first language: a developmental study. Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics, Vigo, v. 8, p. 206-234, 2011. Disponível em: <https://revistas.uvigo.es/index.php/vial/article/view/46>. Acesso em: 18/06/2025.

WOLGEMUTH, K.; KAMHI, A.; LEE, R. Metaphor performance in children with hearing impairment. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, Washington, v. 29, n. 4, p. 216-231, 1998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461.2904.216

Downloads

Publicado

2025-09-09

Como Citar

How Do Oral Deaf Individuals Comprehend Primary Metaphors and Idioms? Let’s Begin to Dot the I’s and Cross the T’s. Revista de Estudos da Linguagem, [S. l.], v. 33, n. 3, p. 114–131, 2025. DOI: 10.17851/2237-2083.33.3.114-131. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/relin/article/view/61412. Acesso em: 22 dez. 2025.