A reflection on a cost-effectiveness analysis of the nursing process
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35699/2316-9389.2025.53003Keywords:
Nursing Process, Cost-benefit Analysis, Health Services Administration, Clinical Nursing Research, NursingAbstract
Objective: this theoretical reflective study aimed to discuss the principles of cost-effectiveness analysis and its application to the nursing process in the context of healthcare system sustainability. Method: the analysis explored the current state of healthcare systems worldwide, noting the underfunding that poses a significant threat to achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. Results: the study highlights that currently, the employment of the nursing process can reduce morbidity and mortality, significantly impacting individuals, families, health systems, and society. Conclusion: it is crucial for nurses to conduct cost-effectiveness studies across various care contexts. Active participation in generating economic evidence can clarify the cost-effectiveness of interventions, aid in optimizing resource allocation, support health system sustainability, and contribute to the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals.
Downloads
References
1. Madu A, Osborne K. Healthcare Financing in Nigeria: a policy review. International Journal of Social Determinants of Health and Health Services [Internet]. 2023 [citado em 2025 fev. 12];53:434-43. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1177/27551938231173611
2. Organização das Nações Unidas-ONU. Transformando nosso mundo: a Agenda 2030 para o desenvolvimento sustentável. Rio de Janeiro: Centro de Informação das Nações Unidas para o Brasil (UNIC Rio); 2015 out. 13 [citado em 2025 fev. 12]. Disponível em: https://brasil.un.org/sites/default/files/2020-09/agenda2030-pt-br.pdf
3. Allotey P, Reidpath D, Yasin S, Chan C, Aikins A. Rethinking health-care systems: a focus on chronicity. The Lancet [Internet]. 2011 [citado em 2025 fev. 12];377:450-1. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61856-9
4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US). Cost-Effectiveness analysis. Atlanta: CDC; 2024 [citado em 2025 fev. 15]. Disponível em: https://www.cdc.gov/polaris/php/economics/cost-effectiveness.html#:~:text=Cost%2Deffectiveness%20analysis%20(CEA),gained%20or%20a%20death%20prevented
5. Panerai RB, Mohr JP. Health technology assessment methodologies for developing countries [dissertation]. Washington-DC: Pan American Health Organization; 1989.
6. Ministério da Saúde (BR). Portaria nº 2.510, de 19 de dezembro de 2005. Institui comissão para elaboração da política de gestão tecnológica no âmbito do Sistema Único de Saúde-CPGT. Brasília; 2005 [citado em 2024 jun. 14]. Disponível em: https://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/saudelegis/gm/2005/prt2510_19_12_2005.html
7. Gonçalves RBM. Tecnologia e organizaçäo social das práticas de saúde: características tecnológicas do processo de trabalho na rede estadual de centros de saúde de São Paulo [dissertação]. São Paulo: Hucitec; 1994.
8. Tadzong-Awasum G, Dufashwenayesu A. Implementation of the nursing process in Sub-Saharan Africa: an integrative review of literature. Int J Afr Nurs Sci [Internet]. 2021 [citado em 2024 jun. 14];14:100283. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijans.2021.100283
9. Kitson AL. The Fundamentals of care framework as a point-of-care nursing theory. Nurs Res [Internet]. 2018 [citado em 2024 jun. 14];67(2):99-107. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1097/NNR.0000000000000271
10. Creswell JW. Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Los Angeles: Sage Publications; 2014 [citado em 2024 jun. 14]. Disponível em: https://www.ucg.ac.me/skladiste/blog_609332/objava_105202/fajlovi/Creswell.pdf
11. Nita ME, Secoli SR, Nobre MRC, Ono-Nita SK, Campino ACC, Santi FM, et al. Avaliação de tecnologias em saúde: evidência clínica, análise econômica e análise de decisão. Porto Alegre: Artmed; 2009.
12. Nita ME, Secoli SR, Nobre M, Ono-Nita SK. Métodos de pesquisa em avaliação de tecnologia em saúde. Arq Gastroenterol [Internet]. 2009 [citado em 2024 jun. 14];46:252-5. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0004-28032009000400002
13. Lee M, Moorhead S, Clancy T. Determining the cost-effectiveness of hospital nursing interventions for patients undergoing a total hip replacement. J Nurs Manag [Internet]. 2014 [citado em 2024 jun. 14];22 (7):825-36. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.12022
14. Husereau D, Drummond M, Petrou S, Carswell C, Moher D, Greenberg D, et al. Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) - Explanation and elaboration: a report of the ISPOR Health Economic Evaluation Publication Guidelines Good Reporting Practices Task Force. Value Health [Internet]. 2013 [citado em 2024 jun. 14];16(2):231-50. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2013.02.002
15. Neumann PJ, Sanders GD, Russell LB, Siegel JE, Ganiats TG. Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine: Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2017 [citado em 2024 jun. 14]. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190492939.001.0001
16. Sabaté E, World Health Organization. Adherence to long-term therapies: evidence for action. Geneve: WHO; 2003 [citado em 2024 jun. 14]. Disponivel em: https://www.google.com.br/books/edition/Adherence_to_Long_term_Therapies/kcYUTH8rPiwC?hl=pt-BR&gbpv=1&dq=Adherence+to+long-term+therapies:+evidence+for+action&printsec=frontcover
17. Gellad WF, Grenard JL, Marcum ZA. A systematic review of barriers to medication adherence in the elderly: looking beyond cost and regimen complexity. Am J Geriatr Pharmacother [Internet]. 2011 [citado em 2024 jun. 14];9(1):11-23. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjopharm.2011.02.004
18. Dunn EC, Small RE. Economics of antihypertensive therapy in the elderly. Drugs & Aging [Internet]. 2001[citado em 2024 jun. 24];18(7):515-25. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.2165/00002512-200118070-00005
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 REME-Revista Mineira de Enfermagem
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Links
Facebook
Instagram
Twitter
