Iusfeminism and Legal Subversion

The Right to Evil as a Response to NormativePatriarchy

Abstract

Through its multiple branches, the law reproduces various systems of oppression such as the patriarchal system, in order to maintain the masculine privileges of each space and time. In this sense, legal feminisms have gained relevance in the defense and critique of this legal patriarchy, which as a consequence have modified the current normative bodies, to integrate feminist demands that respond to specific conjunctural problems. Although these legal feminisms have made important changes in favor of gender equality, this text argues that there are still fairer acts than those for which iusfeminism prays. One of these prerogatives is female disobedience to the law as a form of liberation, under the prerogative of the right to evil. In this text we will focus on the right to property in Mexico.

The methodological aspect of this proposal is qualitative, strictly documentary. Its nature is descriptive, analytical, and comparative in relation to the binomial of social and legal processes, in which feminist epistemologies are included. Among the findings, disobedience of the law is possible and more feasible than obedience itself.

The methodological aspect of this proposal is qualitative, strictly docunentary. Its nature is descriptive, analytical, and conparative in relation to the binomial of social and legal processes, in which feninist epistenologies are included. Among the findings, disobedience to the law is possible and more feasible than obedience itself.