Vol. 6 Núm. 2 (2025): Animales políticos: animalidad, comunidad y el futuro del cuerpo político
Dossier especial

Derechos y liberación para lo inexistente: las implicaciones de la de-extinción

PDF (Inglés)
  • Richard Giles
Richard Giles
Independent researcher, Canada
Biografía

Publicado 2025-10-14

Palabras clave

  • De-extinción,
  • Zoopolis,
  • Utilitarismo,
  • Biotecnología,
  • Animales Salvajes

Derechos de autor 2025 Richard Giles

Creative Commons License

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.

Cómo citar

GILES, Richard. Derechos y liberación para lo inexistente: las implicaciones de la de-extinción. (Des)troços: revista de pensamento radical, Belo Horizonte, v. 6, n. 2, p. e59883, 2025. DOI: 10.53981/destrocos.v6i2.59883. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/revistadestrocos/article/view/59883. Acesso em: 17 feb. 2026.
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Share

Resumen

La de-extinción es una innovación biotecnológica emergente que ha experimentado un repentino aumento de la atención mediática y de la inversión, con implicaciones considerables para las poblaciones animales de todo tipo. Este artículo, tras ofrecer una visión general del discurso, la retórica y las ideas sobre la de-extinción, contextualiza esta innovación en las obras de Catia Faria, Sue Donaldson y Will Kymlicka. Dicha contextualización impulsa a la teoría animal a abordar la de-extinción con mayor profundidad, más allá del rechazo inmediato de la práctica. La de-extinción tiene graves implicaciones para las poblaciones animales que deben considerarse teóricamente, tanto para criticar la práctica como para comprender mejor la importancia del marco teórico en el contexto del actual "giro animal" en la teoría política.

PDF (Inglés)

Descargas

Los datos de descarga todavía no están disponibles.

Referencias

  1. CHRISTMAN, Phil. Turning Nothings into Somethings: ‘Postcapitalist Desire.’ Commonweal, Dec. 3, 2020. Available at: https://www.commonwealmagazine.org/turning-nothings-somethings. Accessed: Jun. 11, 2025.
  2. CLINE, Timon. To Boldly Go: Critical Animal Studies, the Final Frontier. New Discourses, Oct. 15, 2020. Available at https://newdiscourses.com/2020/10/boldly-go-critical-animal-studies-final-frontier/. Accessed June 13, 2025.
  3. COHEN, Shlomo. The Ethics of De-Extinction. Nanoethics, v. 8, pp. 165-178, 2014.
  4. CORDER, Mike. Elephant in the Dining Room: Startup Makes Mammoth Meatball. The Associated Press, Mar. 28, 2023. Available at: https://apnews.com/article/oddities-mammoth-meatball-30e0731838f52cc18fb22d1faee1f8ce. Accessed June 11, 2025.
  5. DONALDSON, Sue; Kymlicka, Will. Zoopolis: a Political Theory of Animal Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.
  6. FARIA, Catia. Animal Ethics in the Wild: Wild Animal Suffering and Intervention in Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2023.
  7. FINKELMAN, Leonard. De-Extinction and the Conception of Species. Biology & Philosophy, v. 33, pp. 1-18, 2018.
  8. GENOVESI, Piero; Simberloff, Daniel. ‘De-extinction’ in Conservation: Assessing Risks of Releasing ‘Resurrected’ Species. Journal for Nature Conservation, v. 56, pp. 1-5, 2020.
  9. GILES, Richard. Does Cultured Meat Decouple Animals From Meat?. Animal Liberation Journal, v. 1, n. 1, pp. 8-23, 2024.
  10. GILES, Richard. Under the Skin: Assessing the Ideological Underpinnings and Material Reality of Cultured Meat. Doctoral Dissertation. Waterloo: University of Waterloo, 2022.
  11. GREELY, Henry T. Is De-Extinction Special? Hastings Center Report, v. 47, n. 4, pp. 30-36, 2017.
  12. IACONA, Gwenllian, et al. Prioritizing Revived Species: What are the Conservation Management Implications of De-Extinction?. Functional Ecology, v. 31, pp. 1041-1047, 2017.
  13. JØRGENSEN, Dolly. Reintroduction and De-Extinction. Bioscience Magazine, v. 63, n. 9, pp. 719-720, 2013.
  14. KUMAR, Mohan B. et al. Harvesting Activities Among First Nations People Living Off Reserve, Métis and Inuit: Time Trends, Barriers and Associated Factors. Aboriginal Peoples Survey, pp. 1-58, 2019.
  15. MAX, D.T. The Dire Wolf Is Back. The New Yorker, v. 101 (CI), n. 8, pp. 30-41, Apr. 14, 2025.
  16. MEINE, Curt. De-extinction and the Community of Being. Hastings Center Report, v. 47, n. 4, pp. 9-17, 2017.
  17. MELZENER, Lea et al. Cultured Beef: From Small Biopsy to Substantial Quantity. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, v. 101, pp. 7-14, 2021.
  18. MILLIGAN, Tom. The Political Turn in Animal Rights. Politics and Animals, v. 1, n. 1, pp. 6-15, 2015.
  19. MORREAU, Corrie S.; Ware, Jessica L. Fund Natural History Museums, Not De-Extinction. Nature, v. 598, p. 32, 2021.
  20. NOVAK, Ben Jacob. De-Extinction. Genes, v. 9, n. 548, pp. 1-33, 2018.
  21. OUGH, Tom. The Mammoth in the Room. The Independent, Sep. 10, 2022.
  22. REGAN, Tom. The Case for Animal Rights. California: University of California Press, 1983.
  23. SANDLER, Ronald et al. Eric Katz on ‘De-Extinction:’ Ontology, Value, and Normativity. Ethics, Policy & Environment, v. 25, n. 2, pp. 104-108, 2022.
  24. SEARLE, Adam. Spectral Ecologies: De/extinction in the Pyrenees. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, v. 47, pp. 167-183, 2022.
  25. SELBACH, Christian et al. Parasites Lost: Crucial Element in De-Extinction. Trends in Parasitology, v. 34, n. 1, pp. 9-11, 2018.
  26. SHAPIRO, Beth. How to Clone a Mammoth. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2020.
  27. SHAPIRO, Beth. Pathways to De-Extinction: How Close Can we Get to Resurrection of an Extinct Species?. Functional Ecology, v. 31, pp. 996-1002, 2017.
  28. SINGER, Peter. Animal Liberation Now. New York: Harper Perennial, 2023.
  29. WAGNER, Norman et al. De-Extinction, Nomenclature, and the Law. Science, v. 356, n. 6342, pp. 1016-1017, 2017.
  30. ŽIŽEK, Slavoj. What Lies Ahead? Jacobin, Jan. 17, 2023. Available at: https://jacobin.com/2023/01/slavoj-zizek-time-future-history-catastrophe-emancipation. Accessed: Jun. 11, 2025.