Historicity, Historiography, and Hope
The Moral Economy of Health
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24117/2526-2270.2021.i11.01Keywords:
Historicity, Canguilhem, Sigerist, Collective Health, Health and Medical HumanitiesAbstract
Historicity is a key epistemological component of the definition of “science” proposed by authors such as Gaston Bachelard, Georges Canguilhem and Michel Foucault, and partially accepted by the Brazilian Collective Health builders. What we call the “historicity awareness” of Collective Health is the field’s recognition that there is no knowledge of health without history and that its history interferes with its results, with the conceptualization of its objects, its cognitive and technological practices, and the feasibility of its promises of enhancing the quality of life towards an equal society. This helps explain why Humanities in general and History, in particular, are ubiquitous to Health Education, where they are known as Health and Medical Humanities or, as is more usual in Brazil, Human and Social Sciences in Health. They helped to imagine an equitable health care system of which the concrete manifestation, however imperfect, is the Brazilian Unified National Health System, the SUS. Health Humanities, Medical Humanities, and History of Science and Technology are all interdisciplinary fields that challenge historiography and theory of history to look beyond the borders of our normative understanding of the historian’s professional identity – which legitimacy is achieved through specific academic training – to properly evaluate the multiple expressions of society’s relationships and engagements with history and time.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Tiago Santos Almeida
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.