Foucault and Starobinski

A Critical Relationship or The Living Eye vs. “Gazing at Death”

Authors

  • Malika Sager University of Lausanne – Institut des Humanités en médecine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24117/2526-2270.2022.i12.07

Keywords:

Foucault, Birth of the clinic, writing style, historiography, system of thought, French philosophy

Abstract

In The Birth of the Clinic, Foucault sweeps both bibliographical references and academic deference aside, thumbing his nose at historians of medicine and initiating a bras d’honneur towards traditional historiography. In this article, we will first recall the context of the reception of Foucault’s translation, where we see Anglo-Saxon readers swinging between admiration and repulsion when reading The Birth of the Clinic. An archeology of Medical Perception. We will then demonstrate how Jean Starobinski’s account of it, “Gazing at Death”, differs from those of his English-speaking peers. Finally, we will explain why we read in it the critical relationship, in every sense of the word, that Foucault and Starobinski maintained throughout their lives.

Downloads

Published

2022-06-19

Issue

Section

Dossiers (Issue-specific topics)

How to Cite

“Foucault and Starobinski: A Critical Relationship or The Living Eye Vs. ‘Gazing at Death’”. 2022. Transversal: International Journal for the Historiography of Science, no. 12 (June). https://doi.org/10.24117/2526-2270.2022.i12.07.

Similar Articles

1-10 of 39

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.