POSTERIOR COMPOSITE RESINS
A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
Keywords:
Composite resins, Permanent dental restoration, Dental restoration failureAbstract
Composite resins are being widely used in posterior teeth. The aim of this study was to carry out a systematic review about publications of clinical evaluations regarding the use of this material in pre-molar and molar restorations including the oclusal and/or proximal surfaces, evaluating the criteria used for their execution. The publications were randomly selected from a bibliographical research obeying the prerequisite: indexed and recent (last 5 years) magazine publications. After the data analysis, it was observed that there is a need for standardization of the clinical studies regarding composite resins in posterior teeth in order to facilitate the comparative analysis.
Downloads
References
Lóssio JJD. Resinas Compostas: Uso clínico dos diversos tipos de resinas compostas. Rev Assoc Paul Cir Dent. 1990; 44: 247-249.
Mair LH. Ten-year clinical assesment of three posterior resins restorations and two amalgams. Quintessence Int. 1998; 29: 483-490.
Bastos MTAA, Lovadino JR, Almeida JV, Martins LRM, Navarro MFL. Resinas compostas em dentes posteriores. Rev Odontol Univ São Paulo. 1987; 1: 42-45.
Busato ALS, Barbosa NA, Bueno M, Baldissera RA. Dentística: Restaurações em dentes anteriores. São Paulo: Artes Médicas, 1997: 481.
Raskin A, Michotte-Theall B, Vreven J, Wilson NHF. Clinical evaluation of aposterior composite 10-year report. J Dent. 1999; 27: 13-19.
Jackson RD, Morgan MM. As novas resinas posteriores e uma técnica simplificada de inserção. J Am Dent Assoc. 2000; 3: 81-90.
Souza FB, Pedroza Guimarães R. Avaliação clínica de duas resinas compostas condensáveis e uma resina composta microhíbrida em cavidades oclusais. (Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso - Odontologia). Recife, Pernambuco: Universidade Federal de Pernambuco; 2002. 109 p.
Kreulen CM, Amerongen WEV, Akerboom HBM, Borgmrijer Gruythuyhsem RJM. Evaluation of occlusal marginal adaptation of Class II resincomposite restoration. Journal of Dentistry for Children. 1993; p. 310-314.
Barnes DM, Blank LW, Thompson VP, Holston AM, GINGELL JC. A 5- and 8-year evaluation of a posterior composite resin. Quintessence Int. 1991; 22: 143-
Jokstad A, Bayne S, Blunck U, Tyas M, Wilson N. Quality of dental restorations-FDI cominescon project 2-95. Int Dent J. 2001; 51: 117-158.
Leinfelder KF. Criteria for Clinical Evaluation of Composite Resin restorations.In: Anusavice KJ. Quality Evaluation of Dental Restorations: Criteria for placement and replacement. Florida: Quintessence, 1987: 139-149.
Collins CJ, Bryant RW, Hodge KLV. A clinical evaluation of posterior composite resin restorations: 8-year findings. J Dent. 1998; 26: 311-317.
Mondelli J. Restaurações de resina composta em dentes posteriores: sim ou não? In: Bottino MA, Christa F. Atualização na clínica odontológica: o dia a dia do clínico geral. São Paulo: Artes Médicas, 1992: 91-114.
Baratieri LN, Monteiro Junior S, Andrada MAC, Vieira LCC, Ritter AV, Cardoso AC. Odontologia Restauradora: Fundamentos e Possibilidades. São Paulo: Santos, 2002: 739.
Baratieri LN, Monteiro Junior S, Andrada MAC, Vieira LCC, Ritter AV, Cardoso AC. Dentística: Procedimentos preventivos e restauradores. São Paulo: Santos, 1998: 509.
Rasmusson CG, Kohler B, Odman P. A 3-year clinical evaluation of two composite resins in class-II cavities. Acta Odontol Scand. 1998; 56:70-75.
Lopes LG, Cefaly DFG, Franco EB, Mondelli RFL, Lauris JRP, Navarro MFL. Clinical evaluation of two “packable” posterior composite resins. Clinical Oral Investigations. 2002; 6: 79-83.
Luo Y, Lo ECM, Fang DTS, Smales RJ. Clinical evaluation of Dyract AP restorative in permanent molars: 2-year results. American Journal of Dentistry.2002; 15: 403-406.
Huth KC, Manhard J, Hickel R, Kunzelmann K. Three-year clinical performance of a compomer in stress-bearing restorations in permanent posterior teeth. American Journal of Dentistry. 2003; 16: 255-259.
Lopes LG, Cefaly DFG, Franco EB, Mondelli RFL, Lauris JRP, Navarro MFL. Clinical evaluation of two “packable” posterior composite resins: two years results.Clinical Oral Investigations. 2003; 7: 123-128.
Huth KC, Manhard J, Selbertinger A. 4- year clinical performance and survival analysis of class I and II compomer restorations in permanent teeth. American Journal of Dentistry. 2004; 17: 51-55.
Lopes GC, Baratieri LN, Júnior Monteiro S, Vieira LCC. Effect of posterior resin composite placement technique on the resin-dentin interface formed in vivo. Quintessence International. 2004; 35.
Moura FRR, Piva E, Lund RG, Palha B, Demarco FF. One-year Clinical Evaluation of Two Polyacid-modified Resin Composites (Compomers) in Posterior Permanent Teeth. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry. 2004; 6: 157-162.
Perry RD, Kugel G, Habib CM, McGarry P, Settembrini L. A two-year clinical evaluation of TPH for restoration of class II carious lesions in permanent teeth. Gen Dent. 1997; 5: 344-349.
Peters MC, Delong R, Pintado MR, Pallesen U, Qvist V, Douglas WH. Comparison of two measurements techniques for clinical wear. V. A clinical evaluation of posterior composite resin restorations. J Dent. 1999; 27: 479- 485.
Randal RC, Wilson NHF. Clinical testing materials: some historical landmarks. J Dent. 1999; 27: 543-550.
Goldberg AJ, Rydinge E, Santucci EA, Racz WB. Clinical Evaluation for Posterior Composite Restoration. J Dent Res. 1984; 63: 1387-1391.
