Esquema Ponzi e Justiça Restaurativa

uma estrutura e práticas comparativas entre a Indonésia e a Hungria

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69881/8qc4fd96

Palavras-chave:

Justiça Criminal Comparada, Governança de Fraudes Financeiras, Harmonização Legal, Mecanismos de Mediação, Reparação à Vítima

Resumo

Este estudo examina como a justiça restaurativa pode ser aplicada a esquemas de pirâmide financeira, Ponzi, comparando os marcos legais na Indonésia e na Hungria. O problema de pesquisa reside em determinar como a justiça restaurativa, tradicionalmente utilizada para crimes interpessoais, pode funcionar de forma eficaz em casos complexos de fraude financeira que envolvem múltiplas vítimas e significativos danos econômicos. Utilizando uma abordagem jurídico-doutrinal, o artigo analisa disposições legais, regulamentos e mecanismos institucionais em ambos os países. Os resultados revelam que a Indonésia está em um estágio de transição, incorporando gradualmente a justiça restaurativa por meio de leis recentes, como a Lei nº 1 de 2023 e a Lei nº 4 de 2023, enquanto a Hungria já institucionalizou a mediação vítima-ofensor como parte de seu sistema de justiça criminal. Apesar disso, ambos enfrentam desafios semelhantes: ambiguidades conceituais sobre os esquemas de pirâmide, mecanismos limitados de reparação e dificuldades processuais devido ao grande número de vítimas dispersas. A análise comparativa mostra que o sistema húngaro consolidado de mediação oferece insights práticos para a reforma em curso na Indonésia, embora ambos os sistemas necessitem de maior coerência legal e estratégias de implementação centradas na vítima. Unindo teoria e prática, este estudo avança a justiça restaurativa em crimes econômicos, propondo reformas integradas que equilibrem responsabilização, reparação e prevenção sistêmica em fraudes financeiras transnacionais.

Downloads

Os dados de download ainda não estão disponíveis.

Referências

ADY, T. Pelaksanaan Restorative Justice Terkendala Aturan yang Belum Komprehensif. Hukumonline, 2023. Available at: https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/pelaksanaan-restorative-justice-terkendala-aturan-yang-belum-komprehensif-lt648ac38d9e0a3/.

ANDINI, O. G.; EURIAN, A. A. Restorative Justice in Indonesia Corruption Crime: a Utopia. Legality: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, v. 31, n. 1, p. 72–90. Available at: https://doi.org/10.22219/ljih.v31i1.24247.

BENJANARI, D. R.; DEL ROSARIO, M. S.; NOVIANTI, V. Enhancing Restorative Justice in Indonesia: Exploring Diversion Implementation for Effective Juvenile Delinquency Settlement. Sriwijaya Law Review, v. 7, n. 2, p. 318–334, 2023. Available at: https://doi.org/10.28946/slrev.Vol7.Iss2.2427.pp318-334.

BUDIANTO A. The path of peace as a conflict resolution of ordinary crimes in criminology perspective in indonesia. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, v. 9, p. 300–309, 2020. Available at: https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2020.09.28

BUTTON, M.; MCNAUGHTON NICHOLLS, C.; KERR, J.; OWEN, R. Online Fraud Victims in England and Wales: Victims’ Views on Sentencing and the Opportunity for Restorative Justice? The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, v. 54, n. 2, p. 193–211, 2015. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/hojo.12123.

CHERRY, M. A.; WONG, J. Clawbacks: Prospective contract measures in an era of excessive executive compensation and Ponzi schemes. Minnesota Law Review, v, 94, p. 368, 2009.

CHRISTIE, N. The Ideal Victim. In: From Crime Policy to Victim Policy, p. 17–30, 1986. Palgrave Macmillan UK. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-08305-3_2

DEFRI, W. Robot Trading Fraud, Wahyu Kenzo CS, Accused in Layers. Kompas, september 6, 2023. Available at: https://www.kompas.id/baca/english/2023/09/06/en-penipuan-robot-trading-wahyu-kenzo-cs-didakwa-berlapis.

EDDYONO, S. W. Restorative Justice for Victim’s Rights on Sexual Violence: Tension in Law and Policy Reform in Indonesia. Journal of Southeast Asian Human Rights, v, 5, n. 2, p. 176–201, 2021. Available at: https://doi.org/10.19184/jseahr.v5i2.28011.

FAHARUDDIN, R.; HAKIM, J. Restorative Justice for Corruption Cases the Settlement of Corruption Cases: is it Possible? Yuridika, v. 38, n. 1, p. 73–94, 2023. Available at: https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v38i1.42511.

FARIED, F. S.; MAHMUD, H. Mainstreaming Restorative Justice in Termination of Prosecution in Indonesia. Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System, v. 2, n. 1, p. 66–77, 2022. Available at: https://doi.org/10.53955/jhcls.v2i1.31.

FELLEGI, B. Building and toning: An analysis of the institutionalization of mediation in penal matters in hungary. Temida, v. 14, n. 1, p. 21–36, 2011.

FELLEGI, B.; TÖRZS, E.; VELEZ, E. (n.d.). Restorative justice and victim-offender mediation in Hungary. A Comparative Study of Restorative Justice Legislation in Europe. Frankfurt Am Main: Verlag Für Polizeiwissenschaft.

FITOUCHI, L.; SINGH, M. Punitive justice serves to restore reciprocal cooperation in three small-scale societies. Evolution and Human Behavior, v. 44, n. 5, p. 502–514, 2023. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2023.03.001.

GÖNCZÖL, K. Developing humane criminal justice systems in democratic societies: An update from Hungary. Probation Journal, v. 52, n. 2, p. 181–186, 2005. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0264550505052687.

HAMJEN, H.; RUMATA, V. M.; DAMANIK, M. P. The trading robot regulatory naratives: AI implications in Indonesia. In: Handbook of Research on Artificial Intelligence and Knowledge Management in Asia’s Digital Economy, p. 81–96, 2022. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-5849-5.ch005.

HAMZANI, A. I.; ARYANI, F. D.; BAWONO, B. T.; KHASANAH, N.; YUNNUS, N. R. Non-Procedural Dispute Resolution: Study of the Restorative Justice Approach Tradition in Indonesian Society. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 2023. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X231165425.

HAREFA, O. N. Reconciliation as a Feminist Mission: An Analysis of Reconciliation in Cases of Violence Against Women in Indonesia. Feminist Theology, v. 31, n. 1, p. 76–90, 2022. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/09667350221112886.

HARISON, E.; MIHÁLY, N. On Financial Bubbles and Earthworms: Lessons from Hungary’s Rural Pyramid during its Economic Transition. Eastern European Countryside, v. 27, n. 1, p. 65–88, 2021. Available at: https://doi.org/10.12775/eec.2021.003.

HERCZOG, M. Chance of victim-offender mediation in hungary. In: Victim-Offender Mediation with Youth Offenders in Europe: An Overview and Comparison of 15 Countries, p. 259–273, 2005. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3879-8_12.

HIDAJAT, T.; PRIMIANA, I.; RAHMAN, S.; FEBRIAN, E. Why are people trapped in Ponzi and pyramid schemes?. Journal of Financial Crime, v. 28, n. 1, p. 187–203, 2021. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-05-2020-0093.

HOCK, B.; BUTTON, M. Non-Ideal Victims or Offenders? The Curious Case of Pyramid Scheme Participants. Victims & Offenders, v. 18, n. 7, p. 1311–1334, 2023. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2023.2186996.

JULESZ, M. Mediation in the Netherlands, Belgium and Hungary. Tarsadalomkutatas, v. 30, n. 2, p. 115–124, 2012. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1556/Tarskut.30.2012.2.2.

LOKANAN, M. Restorative Justice: Application to Corporate Fraud. In: NASER, A. (Ed.), New Approaches to CSR, Sustainability and Accountability, p. 137–162, 2023. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-9499-8_8.

MADJID, A.; ISTIQOMAH, M. Restorative Justice: A Suitable Response to Environmental Crime in Indonesia? Krytyka Prawa, v. 15, n. 3, p. 86–100, 2023. Available at: https://doi.org/10.7206/kp.2080-1084.622.

NICHOLSON, D. Environmental litigation in Indonesia. Asia Pacific Journal of Environmental Law, v. 6, n. 1, p. 47–78, 2001. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012440018362.

NOLASCO, C. A. R. I.; VAUGHN, M. S.; DEL CARMEN, R. V. Revisiting the choice model of Ponzi and Pyramid schemes: analysis of case law. Crime, Law and Social Change, v. 60, n. 4, p. 375–400, 2013. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-013-9456-8.

PRIAMBADA, B. S.; SUWADI, P. Involvement of Children in Legal Issues for Criminal Acts of Terrorism in Indonesia: Phenomenon and Inflicting Factors. Migration Letters, v. 20. n. 6, p. 482–492, 2023. Available at: https://doi.org/10.59670/ml.v20i6.3499.

RIZER, Á. Court Mediation Within Administrative Court Proceedings in Hungary. Krytyka Prawa, v. 15, n. 2, p. 79–97, 2023. h Available at: https://doi.org/10.7206/kp.2080-1084.596.

ROCHAETI, N.; MUTHIA, N. Socio-legal study of community participation in restorative justice of children in conflict with the law in Indonesia. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, v. 10, p. 293–298, 2021. Available at: https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2021.10.35.

ROCHAETI, N.; PRASETYO, M. H.; ROZAH, U.; PARK, J. A Restorative Justice System in Indonesia: A Close View from the Indigenous Peoples’ Practices. Sriwijaya Law Review, v. 7, n. 1, p. 87–104, 2023. Available at: https://doi.org/10.28946/slrev.Vol7.Iss1.1919.pp87-104.

SCHMIDT, L. Hungarian vs. American mediators and how to make communities more resilient: This article is related directly to the First European Conference on Law Enforcement and Public Health (LEPH) held in Umea, Sweden in May 2023. Journal of Community Safety and Well-Being, v. 8. n. 3, p. 125–129, 2023.

SETIAWAN, H. H.; WARDIANTI, A.; IRMAYANI, N. R. The practice of diversion for perpetrators of child crimes in Indonesia. In: Restorative Justice and Practices in the 21st Century, p. 205–224, 2023. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-6145-7.ch009.

SPRINGMANN, E. Mediation in the Hungarian Criminal Procedure. Studia Iuvenum Iurisperitorum: A Pecsi Tudomanyegyetem, Allam-Es Jogtudomanyi Kara Hallgatoinak Tanulmanyai, v. 4, p. 148, 2008.

SUFRIADI, Y. The progress of Indonesian law enforcement reform after 25 years of the reform movement. Asian Affairs(UK), 2023. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/00927678.2023.2268491.

SUKARDI, S.; PURNAMA, H. R. Restorative Justice Principles in Law Enforcement and Democracy in Indonesia. Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies, v. 7, n. 1, p. 155–190, 2022. https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v7i1.53057.

SUKENDAR, S.; SAIFULLAH, M.; SULISTIYANTO, P.; RAHMAN, L.; ASY´ARI ULAMAI, A. H. Women’s Access To Justice: Mediation For The Victims of Domestic Violence In Central Java, Indonesia. Samarah, v. 7, n. 1, p. 602–628, 2023. Available at: https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v7i1.9471.

SURYONO, R. R.; BUDI, I.; PURWANDARI, B. Detection of fintech P2P lending issues in Indonesia. Heliyon, v. 7, n. 4, 2021. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06782.

SUSILO, D.; PUTRANTO, T. D.; NAVARRO, C. J. S. Indonesian Criminal Code about Drugs and Narcotics: Justice and Media Portrayal. Journal of Drug and Alcohol Research, v. 11, n. 1, 2022. Available at: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85125813159&partnerID=40&md5=01a11ef425d6cbe861c21208ce7bfedf.

SUSILOWATI, C. M. I. Establishing humanistic tendencies through restorative justice in the law enforcement context. Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues, v. 22, n. 2, 2019. Available at: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85071174733&partnerID=40&md5=09e1407140474718a4f0a2300b1a6cb0.

SYAUFI, A. Remodeling of Criminal Case Settlement in Indonesia. WSEAS Transactions on Environment and Development, v. 19, p. 233–244, 2023. Available at: https://doi.org/10.37394/232015.2023.19.20.

SYAUFI, A.; HAITI, D. Application of restorative justice values in settling medical malpractice cases. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, v. 10, p. 103–110, 2021. Available at: https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2021.10.14.

TAJTI, T.Central European Contribution to the American Debate on the Definition of Securities or Why Does the Definition of Security Matter: The Fiasco of the Hungarian Real Estate Investment Cooperatives, Pyramiding, and Why Emerging Capital Markets Should Be Equ. Transnational Law & Contemporary, v. 15, p. 109, 2005.

TAJTI, T. Pyramid and Ponzi Schemes and the Price of Inadequate Regulatory Responses: A Comparative Account of the Diverging Regulatory Responses of China, Europe, and the United States. Business & Bankruptcy Law Journal, v. 5, p. 19, 2019.

TAJTI, T. Pyramid and Ponzi schemes and the repercussions of the differing regulatory approaches Hungarian developments in the light of contemporary global trends. Hungarian Journal of Legal Studies, v. 62, n. 1, p. 24–74, 2021. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1556/2052.2021.00313.

TAJTI, T. Pyramid and Ponzi schemes and the repercussions of the differing regulatory approaches. Hungarian Journal of Legal Studies, v. 62, n. 1, p. 24–74, 2022. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1556/2052.2021.00313.

TÜNDE, B. Mediation and restorative justice post-sentence: The Hungarian experience. Policy and Race Journal, v. 9, p. 73–81, 2009.

VANFRAECHEM, I.; AERTSEN, I. Action research in criminal justice: Restorative justice approaches in intercultural settings. In: Action Research in Criminal Justice: Restorative justice approaches in intercultural settings, 2017. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315651453.

YULIA, R.; PRAKARSA, A.; ALI, M. (2023). Restoring the Conflicts among Societies: How does Baduy Society Settle the Criminal Cases through Restorative Justice? Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, v. 12, n. 3, p. 193–203, 2023. Available at: https://doi.org/10.36941/ajis-2023-0071.

ZARKASI, M. F.; AZISA, N. Implications of Renewal System of Criminal Justice Based on the Principles of Restorative Justice on The Role of Probation and Parole Officer. Khazanah Hukum, v. 4, n. 1, , p. 29–44, 2022. Available at: https://doi.org/10.15575/kh.v4i1.17354.

ZEHR, H. Justice as restoration, justice as respect. The Justice Professional, v. 11, n. 1-2, p. 71–87, 1998. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/1478601X.1998.9959489.

ZEHR, H. The little book of restorative justice: Revised and updated. Simon and Schuster, 2015.

Downloads

Publicado

19.06.2026

Como Citar

Esquema Ponzi e Justiça Restaurativa: uma estrutura e práticas comparativas entre a Indonésia e a Hungria. (2026). Revista Do CAAP, 31(1), 1-30. https://doi.org/10.69881/8qc4fd96