PERCEPCIÓN PÚBLICA DE LA CIENCIA: ¿QUÉ CIENCIA?; ¿QUÉ PÚBLICO? UNA APROXIMACIÓN AL IMPACTO DE LOS ENFOQUES ETNOGRÁFICOS EN LOS ESTUDIOS DE PERCEPCIÓN PÚBLICA DE LA CIENCIA
PUBLIC PERCEPTION OF SCIENCE: WHAT IS SCIENCE? WHAT IS PUBLIC? THE IMPACT OF ETHNOGRAPHIC APPROACHES IN STUDIES OF THE PUBLIC PERCEPTION OF SCIENCE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-21172010120110Palavras-chave:
Percepção Pública da Ciência; Modelo de Déficit; Enfoques Etnográficos.Resumo
El presente trabajo tiene por objeto estudiar el impacto del enfoque etnográfico en el desarrollo del campo de estudios de percepción pública de la ciencia. Con tal objeto, presento, en primer lugar, los linea- mientos sobre los cuales se desarrollaron los primeros estudios y las con- cepciones de ciencia y público en las cuales se apoyaron. En segundo lugar, abordo las perspectivas etnográficas que dieron forma a un nuevo modelo de análisis de la percepción pública de la ciencia. Por último, a modo de cierre, propongo un breve balance de los alcances y limitaciones de este modelo de análisis y de la situación actual del campo de los estu- dios de percepción pública de la ciencia.
This paper examines the impact of the ethnographic approach in the public understanding of science. First of all, I present the guide lines on which the first studies were developed and the conceptions of science and public which supported them. Secondly, I introduce the ethnographic perspective that guided a new analysis model for the public perception of science. Finally, I conclude with a brief balance of the scope and the limitations of that perspective and the field current situation.
Referências
BARNES, B. Interests and the Growth of Knowledge. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1977.
BAUER, M. ; DURANT, J.; EVANS, G. European Public Perceptions of Science. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, v. 6, n. 2, p. 163-186, 1994.
BAUER, M. W.; ALLUM, N.; MILLER, S. What can we learn from 25 years of PUS survey research? Liberating and expanding the agenda. Public Understanding of Science, v. 16, p. 79-95, 2007.
BLOOR, D. Conocimiento e imaginario social. Tradução de Emmanuel Lizcano Rubén Blanco. Barcelona: Gedisa, 1998. Título original: Knowledge and Social Imagery.
COLLINS, H. M. Introduction: Stages in the Empirical Programme of Relativism. Social Studies of Science, v.11, n.1, especial: Knowledge and Controversy: Studies of Modern Natural Science, p. 3-10, 1981.
CORTASSA, C. (2007) Más allá del déficit cognitivo. Confianza y justicia epistémicas en la relación entre expertos y ciudadanos. Ponencia presentada en el 10 Congreso Argentino de Estudios Sociales de la Ciencia y la Tecnologia, Bernal, 2007.
EPSTEIN, S. Impure Science: AIDS, Activism, and the Politics of Knowledge. Berkeley and Los Angeles, California: California University Press, 1996.
EVANS, G.; DURANT, J.The relationship between knowledge and attitudes in the public under standing of science in Britain. Public Understanding of Science, v. 4, p. 57-74, 1995.
FELT, U. Why should the public "understand" science? Some aspects of Public Understanding of Sciencefrom a historical perspective. In:
DIERKES; M.; VON GROTE, C. (Eds.) Between Understanding and Trust: The Public, Science and Technology. Londres: Routledge, 2000, p.7-38.
IRWIN, A. Citizen Science: A Study of People, Expertise and Sustainable Development. Oxon: Routledge, 1995.
IRWIN, A. Constructing the scientific citizen: Science and democracy in the biosciences., Public Understanding of Science v.10, p. 1-18, 2001.
IRWIN, A.; MICHAEL, M. Science, Social Theory and Public Knowledge. Berkshire: Open University Press, 2003.
FAYARD, P. Let's stop persecuting people who don't think like Galileo!, Public Understanding of Science v. 1, p. 15-16, 1992.
KNORR CETINA, K. The Manufacture of Knowledge: an Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science. Oxford: Pergamon, 1981.
LATOUR, B. Ciencia en acción. Espana: Labor, 1992. Título original: Science in Action, How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society.
LATOUR, B.; WOOLGAR, S. La vida en el laboratorio. Espana: Alianza Editorial, 1995. Título ori ginal: Laboratory Life. The (Social) Construction of Scientific Facts.
LEVY-LEBLOND, J. M. About misunderstandings about misunderstandings., Public Understanding of Science v. 1, p. 17-21, 1992.
MARLIER, E. Biotechnology and genetic engineering, what Europeans think about it in 1993. Brussels: INRA, 1993.
MILLER, J. D. Scientific Literacy: a Conceptual and Empirical Review. Daedalus, v. 112, n. 2, p. 29- 48, 1983.
MILLER, J. D. Towards a Scientific Understanding of the Public Understanding of Science and Technology., Public Understanding of Science v. 1, p. 23-30, 1992.
POLINO, C.; FAZIO, M. E.; VACCAREZZA, L. Medir la percepción pública de la ciencia en los países iberoamericanos. Aproximación a problemas conceptuales. Revista Iberoamericana de Ciencia, Tecnologia, Sociedad e Innovación, n. 5, 2003.
PUTNAM, H. Lo que las teorías no son. In: OLIVÉ, L.; PÉREZ RANSANZ, A. R. (Eds.), Filosofia de la ciencia: teoría y observación. México: Siglo XXI, 1989, 312-329. Título original: What Theories Are Not?. In: NAGEL, E., SUPPES, P; TARSKI, A. Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science: Proceedings of the 1960 International Congress. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1962.
ROYAL SOCIETY. The Public Understanding of Science. London: The Royal Society, 1985. Disponível em: http://royalsociety.org/document.asp?tip=1&id=6903
SHAPIN, S. Why the public ought to understand science-in-the-making., Public Understanding of Science n.1, p.27-30, 1992.
STURGIS, P.; ALLUM, N.Science in society: re-evaluating the deficit model of public attitudes., Public Understanding of Science v. 13, p. 55-74, 2004.
VACCAREZZA, L. The Public Perception of Science and Technology in a Periphery. Science, Technology and Society, v. 12, p. 141-163, 2007.
VON GROTE, C.; DIERKES. M. Public Understanding of Science and Technology: State of the Art and Consequences for Future Research. In: DIERKES, M.; VON GROTE, C. (Eds.).. Between Understanding and Trust: The Public, Science and Technology Londres: Routledge, 2000, p.341-362.
WYNNE, B. Public understanding of science research: New horizons or hall of mirrors?, Public Understanding of Science v. 1, p. 37-43, 1992a.
WYNNE, B. Misunderstood misunderstanding: Social identities and public uptake of science., Public Understanding of Science v.1, p. 281-304, 1992b.
WYNNE, B.. Public Understanding of Science. JASANOFF, S.; MARKLE, G. E.; PETERSEN, J. C.; PINCH, T. (Eds.), Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage. 1995, p. 361-388.
YEARLEY, S. Understanding science from the perspective of the sociology of scientific knowl edge: An overview., Public Understanding of Science v. 3, p. 245-258, 1994.
YEARLEY, S. Making systematic sense of public discontents with expert knowledge: two analytical approaches and a case study., Public Understanding of Science v. 9, p. 105-122, 2000.
