ARE NECESSARY IDENTITIES EVER DISBELIEVED?
Palavras-chave:
Necessary identity, Beliefs, Indexicals, Proper names, Direct Reference TheoryResumo
The purpose of this paper is to bring out, by means of a simple thought experiment involving demonstratives, a discrepancy between what is expressed and what is believed (which contradicts the Theory of Direct Reference), and to consider some consequences of this – most notably, whether we might hold, for example, that the ancients never believed that Hesperus is not Phosphorus.
Downloads
Não há dados estatísticos.
Referências
BEALER, G. “Modal Epistemology and the Rationalist Renaissance”. In: Conceivability and Possibility. Ed. T. S. Gendler & J. Hawthorne. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002. pp. 71-125.
CHALMERS, D. J. “The Components of Content” (Revised Version). In: Philosophy of Mind: Classical and Contemporary Readings. Ed. D. J. Chalmers. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002. pp. 608-33.
CHURCH, A. “A Remark Concerning Quine's Paradox about Modality”. In: Propositions and Attitudes. Ed. N.Salmon & S. Soames. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988. pp. 58-65. (Original Spanish version in 1982: Analisis Filosófico, 2, pp. 25-32.)
GENDLER, T. S. &HAWTHORNE, J. (eds.). “Conceivability and Possibility”. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2002.
KAPLAN, D. “Demonstratives: An Essay on the Semantics, Logic, Metaphysics, and Epistemology of Demonstratives and Other Indexicals”. In: Themes from Kaplan. Ed. J. Almog & J. Perry & H. Wettstein. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989 [1977]. pp. 481-563.
KRIPKE, S. “Naming and Necessity”. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1980 [1972].
MAUNU, A. “Necessary a Posteriori Identity Truths: Fregeanism Beats Direct Reference Theory”. Axiomathes, 28, 2018. pp. 73-80.
RUSSELL, B. “On Denoting”. Mind, 14, 1905, pp. 479-93.
STALNAKER, R. “Assertion”. In: Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 9: Pragmatics. Ed. P. Cole. New York: Academic Press, 1978. pp. 315-32. Reprinted in: Context and Content: Essays on Intentionality in Speech and Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999. pp. 78-95.
STALNAKER, R. “Semantics for Belief”. Philosophical Topics, 15, 1987. Reprinted in: Context and Content: Essays on Intentionality in Speech and Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999. pp. 117-29.
STALNAKER, R. “Assertion Revisited: On the Interpretation of Two-Dimensional Modal Semantics”. In: Two-Dimensional Semantics. Ed. M. Garcia-Carpintero & J. Macia. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2006. pp. 293-309.
YABLO, S. “No Fool’s Cold: Notes on Illusions of Possibility”. In: Two-Dimensional Semantics. Ed. M. Garcia-Carpintero & J. Macia. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2006. Reprinted in:Thoughts: Papers on Mind, Meaning, and Modality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008. pp. 151-70.
CHALMERS, D. J. “The Components of Content” (Revised Version). In: Philosophy of Mind: Classical and Contemporary Readings. Ed. D. J. Chalmers. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002. pp. 608-33.
CHURCH, A. “A Remark Concerning Quine's Paradox about Modality”. In: Propositions and Attitudes. Ed. N.Salmon & S. Soames. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988. pp. 58-65. (Original Spanish version in 1982: Analisis Filosófico, 2, pp. 25-32.)
GENDLER, T. S. &HAWTHORNE, J. (eds.). “Conceivability and Possibility”. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2002.
KAPLAN, D. “Demonstratives: An Essay on the Semantics, Logic, Metaphysics, and Epistemology of Demonstratives and Other Indexicals”. In: Themes from Kaplan. Ed. J. Almog & J. Perry & H. Wettstein. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989 [1977]. pp. 481-563.
KRIPKE, S. “Naming and Necessity”. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1980 [1972].
MAUNU, A. “Necessary a Posteriori Identity Truths: Fregeanism Beats Direct Reference Theory”. Axiomathes, 28, 2018. pp. 73-80.
RUSSELL, B. “On Denoting”. Mind, 14, 1905, pp. 479-93.
STALNAKER, R. “Assertion”. In: Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 9: Pragmatics. Ed. P. Cole. New York: Academic Press, 1978. pp. 315-32. Reprinted in: Context and Content: Essays on Intentionality in Speech and Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999. pp. 78-95.
STALNAKER, R. “Semantics for Belief”. Philosophical Topics, 15, 1987. Reprinted in: Context and Content: Essays on Intentionality in Speech and Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999. pp. 117-29.
STALNAKER, R. “Assertion Revisited: On the Interpretation of Two-Dimensional Modal Semantics”. In: Two-Dimensional Semantics. Ed. M. Garcia-Carpintero & J. Macia. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2006. pp. 293-309.
YABLO, S. “No Fool’s Cold: Notes on Illusions of Possibility”. In: Two-Dimensional Semantics. Ed. M. Garcia-Carpintero & J. Macia. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2006. Reprinted in:Thoughts: Papers on Mind, Meaning, and Modality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008. pp. 151-70.
Downloads
Publicado
02-10-2020
Como Citar
MAUNU, A. ARE NECESSARY IDENTITIES EVER DISBELIEVED?. Revista Kriterion, [S. l.], v. 61, n. 145, 2020. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/article/view/25650. Acesso em: 18 nov. 2024.
Edição
Seção
Artigos
