COOPERAÇÃO, COMPETIÇÃO E O PROCESSO LEGISLATIVO
SOBRE A PROIBIÇÃO DAS FACÇÕES EM ROUSSEAU
Palavras-chave:
J.-J. Rousseau, processo legislativo, competição/cooperação, faccionalizaçãoResumo
Este texto pretende discutir a célebre restrição impostas às sociedades parciais no Capítulo III do Livro II do Contrato social. Defende-se a hipótese de que essa proibição pode frutiferamente ser considerada à luz das especificidades da dinâmica de cooperação/competição entre grupos e seus efeitos no processo legislativo e, por extensão, na coesão social.
Downloads
Referências
ALLARD, G. “La pensée politique des Dialogues: le juste, l’injuste et le juge”. In: I. Brouard-Arends (ed.), 2003, pp. 105-126.
ALVES, V. “O risco das facções na república segundo Rousseau”. Kínesis, Vol. 11, Nr. 30, pp. 154-168, 2019.
AUSTIN, W.G. WORCHEL, S (eds.). “The Social Psychology of Inter-Group Relations”. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole, 1979.
BACHOFEN, B. “Intérêt individuel, intérêt privé, intérêt commun. Les complications de la notion d’intérêt particulier”. In: B. Bachofen et al. (eds.), 2014, pp. 393-411.
BACHOFEN, B. et al. (eds.). “Philosophie de Rousseau”. Paris: Garnier, 2014.
BERNARDI, B. “La fabrique des concepts: Recherches sur l’invention conceptuelle chez Rousseau”. Paris: Honoré Champion, 2006.
BERNARDI, B. et al. (eds.). “Religion, liberté, justice: sur les Lettres écrites de la montagne de J.-J. Rousseau”. Paris: Vrin, 2005.
BOVENS, L., BEISBART, C. “Factions in Rousseau’s Du Contrat Social and federal representation”. Analysis, Vol. 67, Nr.1, pp. 12-20, 2007.
BOWLES, S. “Did Warfare Among Ancestral Hunter-Gatherers Affect the Evolution of Human Social Behaviors?” Science, Vol. 324, Nr. 5.932, pp. 1293-1298, 2009.
BROOKE, C. “Aux limites de la volonté générale: silence, exil, ruse et désobéissance dans la pensée politique de Rousseau”. Les Études Philosophiques, 2007/4, Nr. 83, pp. 425-444, 2007.
BROUARD-ARENDS, I. (ed.). “Lectures de Rousseau: Rousseau juge de Jean-Jacques. Dialogues”. Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes, 2003.
COHEN, J. “Rousseau: A Free Community of Equals”. Oxford/Nova York: Oxford UP, 2010.
CONSANI, C. F. “O conceito de vontade na filosofia política de Rousseau e Condorcet”. Trans/Form/Ação, Vol. 41, Nr. 1, pp. 99-140, 2018.
CONSANI, C. F., KLEIN, J. T. “Democracia, deliberação e discussão na filosofia política de Rousseau”. Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia, Vol. 73, Nr. 1, pp. 239-266, 2017.
CROCKER, L. “Rousseau’s Social Contract: An Interpretive Essay”. Cleveland: The Press of Case Western Reserve University, 1968.
DALY, E. “Rousseau’s Constitutionalism: Austerity and Republican Freedom”. Oxford/Portland: Hart, 2017.
DENT, N. J. H. “Rousseau: An Introduction to his Psychological, Social and Political Theory”. Oxford: Blackwell, 1988.
DOVIDIO, J. et al. (eds.). “The Social Psychology of Prosocial Behavior”. Nova York/Londres: Taylor & Francis, 2006.
ESTLUND, D. et al. “Democratic Theory and the Public Interest: Rousseau and Condorcet Revisited”. The American Political Theory Review, Vol. 83, Nr. 4, pp. 1317-1340, 1989.
FORCE, P. “Self-Interest before Adam Smith: A Genealogy of Economic Science”. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2003.
GINTIS, H. et al. (eds.). “Moral Sentiments and Material Interests: The Foundations of Cooperation in Economic Life”. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2005.
GOLDSCHMIDT, V. “Anthropologie et politique: Les principes du système de Rousseau”. 2ª ed. Paris: Vrin, 1983.
GROFMAN, B., FELD, S. “Rousseau’s general will: a Condorcetian perspective”. The American Political Science Review, Vol. 82, Nr. 2, pp. 567-576, 1988.
GUÉNARD, F. “Puissance legislative et puissance exécutive: la marche vers le despotisme. Lettres de la montagne, VII”. In: B. Bernardi et al (eds.), 2005, pp. 127-145.
HAIDT, J. “The Righteous Mind: Why Good People are Divided by Politics and Religion”. Nova York: Pantheon Books, 2012.
HARDIN, R. “The Free rider problem”. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2020. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/free-rider/. Consultado em 17 de Abril de 2021.
HIRSCHMAN, A. “The Passions and the Interests: Political Arguments for Capitalism Before Its Triumph”. Princeton: Princeton UP, 2013.
MANIN, B. “Volonté générale ou délibération: esquisse d’une théorie de la délibération politique”. Le Débat, Vol. 33, pp. 72-94, 1985.
MOSCATELI, R. “Maquiavel versus Rousseau: as divisões sociais e seu papel em uma República bem-ordenada”. Trans/Form/Ação, Vol. 38, pp. 121-138, 2015.
NASCIMENTO, M. M. do. “O Contrato Social – Entre a escala e o programa”. Discurso, Vol. 17, pp. 119-130, 1988.
OPREA, A. “Pluralism and the General Will: The Roman and Spartan Models in Rousseau’s Social Contract”. The Review of Politics, Vol. 81, pp. 573-596, 2019.
PUTTERMAN, E. “Rousseau, Law and the Sovereignty of People”. Cambridge: UP, 2010.
PUURTINEN, M. et al. “The joint emergence of group competition and within-group cooperation”. Evolution and Human Behavior, Vol. 36, pp. 211-217, 2015.
PUURTINEN, M., MAPPES, T. “Between-Group Competition and Human Cooperation”. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, Vol. 276, Nr. 1655, pp. 355-360, 2009.
RADICA, G. “Constitution et lois fondamentales chez Rousseau”. Revista de Filosofia Aurora, Vol. 28, Nr. 43, pp. 19-38, 2016.
REIS, C. A. “Conservadorismo rousseauniano”. Educativa, Vol. 20, Nr. 1, pp. 8-23, 2017.
______. “Igualitarismo e liberdade como não-dominação”. Doispontos, Vol. 16, Nr. 1, pp. 2-13, 2019.
______. “Vontade geral e decisão coletiva”. Trans/Form/Ação, Vol. 33, Nr. 2, pp. 11-34, 2010.
ROUSSEAU, J.-J. “Œuvres complètes”. Vol. II: La Nouvelle Heloïse-Théâtre-Essais littéraires. Paris: Gallimard, 1964a.
______. “Œuvres complètes”. Vol. III: Du contrat social-Écrits politiques. Paris: Gallimard, 1964b.
______. “Œuvres complètes”. Vol. IV: Émile – Éducation – Morale – Botanique. Paris: Gallimard, 1969.
RUNCIMAN, W. G., SEN, A. “Games, Justice and the General Will”. Mind, Nova série, Vol. 74, Nr. 296, pp. 554-562, 1965.
SALINAS FORTES, L. R. “Rousseau: da teoria à prática”. São Paulo: Ática, 1976.
SCHWARTZBERG, M. “Rousseau on fundamental law”. Political Studies, Vol. 51, pp. 387-403, 2003.
SCOTT, J. T. “Rousseau’s anti-agenda setting agenda and contemporary democratic theory”. The American Political Science Review, Vol. 99, Nr. 1, pp. 137-144, 2005.
SHERIF, M. et al. “Intergroup conflict and cooperation: The Robbers Cave experiment”. Norman, OK: University Book Exchange, 1961.
SHKLAR, J. “Men & Citizens: A Study of Rousseau’s Social Theory”. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1969.
SREENIVASAN, G. “What is the general will?” The Philosophical Review, Vol. 109, Nr. 4, pp. 545-581, 2000.
STERELNY, K. “Cooperation, Culture, and Conflict”. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 67, Nr. 1, pp. 31-58, 2014.
TAJFEL, H., TURNER, J. C. “An integrative theory of inter-group conflict”. In: W. G. Austin, S. Worchel (eds.), 1979. pp. 33-47.
THOMPSON, M. “Autonomy and Common Good: Interpreting Rousseau’s General Will”. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, Vol. 25, Nr. 2, pp. 266-285, 2017.
TRACHTENBERG, Z. “Making Citizens: Rousseau’s Political Theory of Culture”. Londres/Nova York: Routledge, 1993.
TURCHIN, P. “Ultrasociety: How 10,000 Years of War Made Humans the Greatest Cooperators on Earth”. Chaplin: Beresta Books, 2016.
______. “Warfare and the Evolution of Social Complexity: A Multilevel-Selection Approach”. Structure and Dynamics, Vol. 4, Nr. 3, pp. 1-37, 2010.
WALDRON, J. “The Wisdom of the Multitude: Some Reflections on Book 3, Chapter 11 of Aristotle's Politics”. Political Theory, Vol. 23, Nr. 4, pp. 563-584, 1995.
WILDSCHUT, T., INSKO, C. A. “Explanations of interindividual – intergroup discontinuity: A review of the evidence”. European Review of Social Psychology, Vol. 18, pp. 175-211, 2007.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Kriterion
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
