THE GROUNDS OF KNOWLEDGE: A COMPARISON BETWEEN KUHN’S PARADIGMS AND FOUCAULT’S EPISTEMES

Autores

  • Paulo Pirozelli Universidade de São Paulo

Palavras-chave:

Thomas Kuhn, Michel Foucault, paradigm, episteme, Philosophy of Science

Resumo

Thomas Kuhn’s “paradigms” and Michel Foucault’s “epistemes” are often seen as similar concepts, in that both would establish necessary conditions of knowledge. However, how close are they to each other? The aim of this article is to compare these two concepts in detail. Firstly, I discuss the similarities and differences between paradigms and epistemes regarding a number of aspects, as well as their respective functions within Kuhn’s and Foucault’s approaches. The analysis is organized around a series of topics, such as “definition” and “scope,” with the intention of facilitating the comparison. Next, I examine some comments that Foucault and Kuhn made on each other’s work, paying particular attention to matters related to the nature and role of paradigms and epistemes.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

AGAMBEN, G. “The Signature of All Things: On Method”. Translated by L. D’Isanto with K. Attell. New York: Urzone, 2009.

BORRADORI, G. “The American Philosopher”. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991.

CANGUILHEM, G. (1967). “The Death of Man, or Exhaustion of the Cogito?”. In: G. Gutting (ed.), 2005, pp. 74-94.

______. “The Normal and the Pathological”. Translated by C. R. Fawcett in collaboration with R. S. Cohen. New York: Urzone, 1989.

______. “Ideology and Rationality in the History of the Life Sciences”. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1990.

CROMBIE, A. (ed.). “Scientific Change”. London: Heinemann, 1963.

DAVIDSON, A. I. “Archeology, Genealogy, Ethics”. In: D. C. Hoy (ed.), 1986, pp. 221-33.

DEFERT, D., EWALD, F (eds.). “Dits et écrits, tome I: 1954-1969”. Paris: Éditions Gallimard, 1994a.

______. “Dits et écrits, tome II: 1970-1975”. Paris: Éditions Gallimard, 1994b.

DREYFUS, H. L., RABINOW, P. “Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics” (2nd ed). Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1983.

FRAVETTI, R. R., SANDRI, G., SCAZZIERI, R. (eds.). “Incommensurability and Translation”. Cheltenham, UK and Norhampton, MA: Edward Elgar, 1999.

FLINN, T. “Foucault’s Mapping of History”. In: G. Gutting (ed.), 2005, pp. 29-48.

FOUCAULT, M. (1961). “Madness and Civilization: A History of Insanity in the Age of Reason”. New York: Vintage, 1988.

______. (1963). “The Birth of the Clinic”. London: Routledge, 2003.

______. (1966). “The Order of Things”. London: Routledge, 2005.

______. (1969a). “Archaeology of Knowledge”. London: Routledge, 1989.

______. (1969b). “Michel Foucault explique son dernier livre”. In: D. Defert & F. Ewald (eds.), 1994a, pp. 771-79.

______. “Foreword to the English Edition”. In: The Order of Things. New York: Routledge, 1970.

______. (1971a). “Polemic: Monstrosities in Criticism”. In: Diacritics, Vol. 1, Nr. 1, 1971, pp. 57-60.

______. (1971b). “Foucault Responds/2”. In: Diacritics, Vol. 1, Nr. 2, 1971, p. 60.

______. (1971c). “Entretien avec Michel Foucault”. In: D. Defert & F. Ewald (eds.), 1994b, pp. 157-74.

______. (1980a). “Truth and Power”. In: C. Gordon (ed.), 1980, pp. 109-33.

______. (1980b). “The Confession of the Flesh”. In: C. Gordon (ed.), 1980, pp. 194-228.

______. “Introduction”. In: G. Canguilhem, 1989, pp. 7-24.

GARFIELD, E. “A Different Sort of Great Books List: The 50 Twentieth-Century Works Most Cited in the Arts & Humanities Citation Index, 1976-1983”. Current Contents, Vol. 16, 1987, pp. 3-7.

GORDON, C. (ed.). “Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews & Other Writings”. New York: Pantheon Books, 1980.

GORDON, P. E. “Agonies of the Real: Anti-realism from Kuhn to Foucault”. Modern Intellectual History, Vol. 9, 2012, pp. 127-47.

GREEN, E. (2016). “What are the most-cited publications in the social sciences (according to Google Scholar)?”. Available at: blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2016/05/12/what-are-the-most-cited-publications-in-the-social-sciences-accordingto-google-scholar (Accessed 21 February 2020).

GUTTING, G. “Thomas Kuhn and the French Philosophy of Science”. In: T. Nickles (ed.), 2003, pp. 45-64.

GUTTING, G. (ed.). “The Cambridge Companion to Foucault” (2nd ed). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.

HACKING, I. “Michel Foucault’s Immature Science”. Noûs, Vol. 13, Nr. 1, 1979, pp. 39-51.

______. (2012). “Introduction Essay”. In: T. S. Kuhn, 1962, pp. vii-xxxvii.

HABERMAS, J. “The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity”. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1987.

HOY, D. C. “Foucault: A Critical Reader”. Oxford: Blackwell, 1986.

KANT, I. (1781). “Critique of Pure Reason”. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.

KUHN, T. S. (1962). “The Structure of Scientific Revolutions”. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 2012.

______. “The Function of Dogma in Scientific Research”. In: A. Crombie, 1963, pp. 347-69.

______. (1968). “The History of Science”. In: T. S. Kuhn, 1977b, pp. 105-26.

______. (1970a). “Reflections on My Critics”. In: T. S. Kuhn, 2000, pp. 123-75.

______. (1970b). “Postscript”. In: T. S. Kuhn, 1962, pp. 173-28.

______. (1974). “Second Thoughts on Paradigms”. In: T. S. Kuhn, 1977b, pp. 293-319.

______. (1977a). “Objectivity, Value Judgment, and Theory Choice”. In: T. S. Kuhn, 1977b, pp. 320-39.

______. (1977b). “The Essential Tension”. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1977.

______. (1981). “What are Scientific Revolutions?”. In: T. S. Kuhn, 2000, pp. 13-32.

______. (1983). “Commensurability, Comparability, Communicability”. In T. S. Kuhn, 2000, pp. 33-57.

______. (1989). “Possible Worlds in History of Science”. In: T. S. Kuhn, 2000, pp. 58-89.

______. (1991). “The Road since Structure”. In: T. S. Kuhn, 2000, pp. 90-104.

______. (1992). “The Trouble with the Historical Philosophy of Science”. In: T. S. Kuhn, 2000, pp. 105-20.

______. (1993). “Afterwords”. In: T. S. Kuhn, 2000, pp. 224-52.

______. (1997). “A Discussion with Thomas Kuhn”. In: T. S. Kuhn, 2000, pp. 253-323.

______. “Remarks on Incommensurability and Translation”. In: R. R. Fravetti et al. (eds.), 1999, pp. 33-37.

______. “The Road since Structure”. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 2000.

LAKATOS, I., MUSGRAVE, A. (eds.). “Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge”. London: Cambridge University Press, 1970.

LAUDAN, L. “The Epistemic, the Cognitive, and the Social”. In: P. Machamer & G. Wolters (eds.), 2004, pp. 14-23.

MACHAMER, P., WOLTERS, G. (eds.). “Science, Values, and Objectivity”. Pittsburgh, Pa: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2004.

MASTERMAN, M. “The Nature of a Paradigm”. In: I. Lakatos & A. Musgrave (eds.), 1970, pp. 59-89.

MERQUIOR, J. G. “Foucault”. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1985.

NICKLES, T. (ed.). “Thomas Kuhn”. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.

PIAGET, J. “Le structuralisme”. Paris: Press Universitaires de France, 1968.

______. “Structuralism”. Translated by C. Maschler. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1971.

STEINER, G. “The Order of Things”. The New York Times Book Review, February 28, 1971a.

______. “Steiner Responds to Foucault”. Diacritics, Vol. 1, Nr. 2, 1971b, p. 59.

WRAY, K. B. “Kuhn’s Evolutionary Social Epistemology”. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.

Downloads

Publicado

2021-06-09

Como Citar

Pirozelli, P. (2021). THE GROUNDS OF KNOWLEDGE: A COMPARISON BETWEEN KUHN’S PARADIGMS AND FOUCAULT’S EPISTEMES. Revista Kriterion, 62(148). Recuperado de https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/article/view/34509

Edição

Seção

Artigos