Leibniz’s Hyper-Reductionism about Extrinsic Denominations
a Further Last Word?
Palavras-chave:
Leibniz, Relations, Extrinsic denominations, Hyper-reductionismResumo
One of Leibniz’s most characteristic metaphysical theses is that there are no ‘purely’ extrinsic denominations (NPED). Traditional reductionist accounts of NPED interpret this thesis as the assertion that extrinsic denominations reduce to (sets of) qualitative facts about the individual substances – in the plural – to which the extrinsic denomination is attributed: only the conjunction of these facts is sufficient to extract the denomination, and hence both (sets of) facts are necessary. This article radicalizes this reductionist interpretation by arguing that, more strongly, an extrinsic denomination reduces to qualitative facts about the extrinsically denominated individual alone – in the singular. To argue for this ‘hyper-reductionist’ interpretation, the article develops a detailed analysis of two Leibnizian arguments for NPED – the argument from ‘the connection of things’, and the argument from substances’ property of conceptual completeness and the containment theory of truth underpinning it. It is proposed that, when seen from the angle of this second argument, NPED turns out to be the strong thesis expressed by hyper-reductionism. After showing this, the article further explains how hyper-reductionism can be seen to accommodate Leibniz’s conception of perception as a sui generis type of absolute property.
Referências
I. Primary sources
I. 1. Leibniz:
A: “Sämtliche Schriften und Briefe”. Ed. by the Academy of Sciences of Berlin. Darmstadt/Leipzig/Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1923-.
AG: “Philosophical Essays”. Ed. and trans. by R. Ariew and D. Garber. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 1989.
C: "Opuscules et fragments inédits de Leibniz". Ed. by L. Couturat. Paris: Félix Alcan, 1903. Reprinted Hildesheim: Olms, 1988.
DM: "Discourse of Metaphyscis". In A VI, 4: 1529-1588/AG 35-68.
GLW: “Briefwechsel zwischen Leibniz und Christian Wolff”. Ed. by C. I.
Gerhardt. Halle: H. W. Schmidt, 1860. Reprinted Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 1963.
GP: "Die philosophischen Schriften". Ed. by C. I. Gerhard. Berlin: Weidmannsche Buchhandlung, 1875-1890. Reprinted Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 1965.
L: "Philosophical Papers and Letters". Ed. and trans. by L. E. Loemker. Dordreacht: Reidel, 1956.
LA: "The Leibniz-Arnauld Correspondence". Ed. and trans. by H. T. Mason, with an introduction by G. H. R. Parkinson. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press, 1967.
LH: "Die Leibniz-Handschriften der königlichen öffentlichen Bibliothek zu Hannover". Ed. by E. Bodemann. Hanover: Hand’sche Buchhandlung, 1895. Reprinted Hildesheim: Olms, 1966.
LV: "The Leibniz-De Volder Correspondence, with selection from the correspondence between Leibniz and Johann Bernoulli". Translated, edited, and with an introduction by P. Lodge. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 2013.
MP: "Philosophical Writings". Ed. and trans. by M. Morris and G. H. R. Parkinson. London: Dent, 1973.
NE: "New Essays on Human Understanding". Ed. and trans. by P. Remnant and J. Bennett. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.
P: "Leibniz. Logical Papers". Ed. and trans. by G. H. R. Parkinson. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1966.
PL-M: "Principia Logico-Metaphysica". In A VI, 4: 1643–1649/AG 30–34 (=“Primary Truths”).
Temmik: "Leibniz’s Notationes quaedam ad Aloysii Temmik Philosophiam and Marginal Notes and Remarks to Temmik’s Text". In Mugnai, Leibniz’s Theory of Relations (Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, 1992), pp. 155-164 (Appendix 4). Quoted by ‘Temmik + page’.
I. 2. Other authors:
Cat.: ARISTOTLE. “Categoriae et Liber de Interpretatione”. Ed. by MinioPaluello. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1974.
Dict. Phil.: VOLCKMAR, H. “Dictionarum philosophicum, hoc est enodatio terminorum ac distinctionum, Francofurti ad Moenum”, 1675.
Disp. Met.: SUÁREZ, F. “Disputationes Metaphysicae”. Ed. by S. Rábade, S. Caballero, and A. Puigcerver. Madrid: Gredos, 1960.
Floretum: LE ROY, A. "Floretum philosophicum seu ludus meudonianus in términos totius philosophiae". Parisiis, 1649.
Lex.: CHAUVIN, É. "Lexicon Philosophicum". Leeuwardiae, 1713.
Lexicon: MICRAELIUS, J. “Lexicon Philosophicum terminorum philosophis usitatorum”. Jenae, 1653.
Logica: JUNGIUS, J. “Logica Hamburgesis”. Ed. by R. W. Meyer. Hamburg, 1957.
Synopsis: CHASTEIGNER, H. L. “Celebriorum distinctionum tum philosophicarum tum theologicarum synopsis”. Londini, 1617.
Termini: HACKSPAN, T. “Termini, distinctiones et divisiones philosophicotheologicae…”. Altdorfi, 1664.
Vade mecum: SCHERZER, J. A. “Vade mecum sive manuale philosophicum quadripartitum”. Lipsiae, 1654.
II. Secondary Literature
BROAD, C. D. “Leibniz. An Introduction”. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975.
BUNNIN, N., YU, J. “The Blackwell Dictionary of Western Philosophy”. Oxford: Blackwell, 2004.
COVER, J. “Relations and Reduction in Leibniz”. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 70, pp. 185-211, 1989.
COVER, J. A., O’LEARY-HAWTHORNE, J. “Substance and Individuation in Leibniz”. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
HINTIKKA, J. “Leibniz on Plenitude, Relations and the Reign of Law”. In Leibniz: A Collection of Critical Essays. Ed. by H. G. Frankfurt. New York: Anchor Books, 1972. pp. 155-190.
ISHIGURO, H. “Leibniz’s Philosophy of Logic and Language”. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1972.
______. “Pre-established Harmony versus Constant Conjunction”. Proceedings of the British Academy, 63, pp. 239-263, 1977.
JAUERNIG, A. “Disentangling Leibniz’s Views on Relations and Extrinsic Denominations’. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 48/2, pp. 171-205, 2010.
JOLLEY, N. “An Unpublished Leibniz MS on Metaphysics”. Studia Leibnitiana, 7/2, pp. 161-189, 1975.
KULSTAD, M. “A Closer Look at Leibniz’s Alleged Reduction of Relations”. Southern Journal of Philosophy, 18, pp. 417-432, 1980.
MCCULLOUGH, L. “Leibniz on Individuals and Individuation: The Persistence of Premodern Ideas in Modern Philosophy”. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1996.
MATES, B. “The Philosophy of Leibniz: Metaphysics and Language”. New York: Oxford University Press, 1986.
MAUNU, A. “Leibnizian Soft Reduction of Extrinsic Denominations and Relations”. Synthese, 139, pp. 143-64, 2004.
MUGNAI, M. “Der Begriff der Harmonie als metaphysische Grundlage der Logik und Kombinatorik bei Johann Heinrich Bisterfeld und Leibniz”. Studia Leibnitiana, 5, pp. 43-73, 1973.
______. “Leibniz’s Theory of Relations” (Studia Leibnitiana Supplementa, 28). Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, 1992.
______. ‘“On Extrinsic Denomination’. Transcription and English Translation (LH IV, iii, 5a-e, Bl. 15)”. The Leibniz Review, 19, pp. 64-66, 2009.
______. “Leibniz’s Ontology of Relations: A Last Word?” In Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy (Volume VI). Ed. by D. Garber and D. Rutherford. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. pp. 171-208.
PLAISTED, D. “Leibniz on Purely Extrinsic Denominations”. Rochester: University of Rochester Press, 2002.
PURYEAR, S. “Monadic Interaction”. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 18/5, pp. 763-793, 2010.
RESCHER, N. “The Philosophy of Leibniz”. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 1967.
______. “Leibniz’s Metaphysics of Nature: A Group of Essays”. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company, 1981.
ROBERT, G. “Perception and Pluralism: Leibniz’s Theological Derivation of Perception in Connection with Platonism, Rationalism and Substance Monism”. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 102/1, pp. 56-101, 2020.
RUSSELL, B. “A Critical Exposition of the Philosophy of Leibniz” (2nd ed.). London: G. Allen & Unwin, 1937.
RUTHERFORD, D. “Leibniz’s and the Rational Order of Nature”. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.
SLEIGH, R. C. Jr. “Leibniz & Arnauld: A Commentary on their Correspondence”. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1990.
WOOLHOUSE, R. “Pre-established Harmony Retuned: Ishiguro versus the Tradition”. Studia Leibnitiana, 17/2, pp. 204-219, 1985.
WONG, D. “Leibniz’s Theory of Relations”. The Philosophical Review, 89/2, pp. 241-56, 1980.
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2026 Revista Kriterion
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
