Hobbes and the Mitigated Adversative Account of Public Interest
Turning Held’s Reading Inside Out
Palavras-chave:
Conflito, Leviatã, Conceções de interesse público, Direito de resistência, Estado de naturezaResumo
This essay explores the concept of “public interest” through various lenses, including ethical considerations and skepticism. We examined “unitary,” “common good,” and “aggregative accounts,” alongside critiques of its “holistic” and “factual value,” while analyzing Virginia Held’s Hobbesian interpretation. Though Hobbesian views share some similarities with favorable public interest accounts, they differ notably. Our proposed “mitigated adversative account of public interest,” particularly a Hobbesian variant, recognizes these nuances, stressing the importance of both instrumental aspects and the complexities inherent in “public interest.” This approach underscores the balance between ideals and practical governance, effectively inverting Held’s reading.
Referências
ANTUNES, P. [“Marx and Public Interest”] “Marx e o Interesse Público. Contributo para um debate político-filosófico Contemporâneo”. Lisboa: Página a Página, 2024.
ARISTOTLE. “Aristotle’s Politics”. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2016.
ARISTOTLE. “Nicomachean Ethics”. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2011.
BARRY, B. “Political Argument”. 2nd impression. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1967 [1965].
BARRY, B. “The Public Interest.” Aristotelian Society, 38 (1), 1964, pp. 1-18.
BENDITT, T. M. “The Public Interest.” Philosophy & Public Affairs, 2 (3), 1973, pp. 291-311.
BENTHAM, J. “An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation”. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996 [1789].
BOBBIO, N. “Thomas Hobbes and the Natural Law Tradition”. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1993.
BOOT, E. R. “The Ethics of Whistleblowing”. New York: Routledge, 2019.
HABERMAS, J. „Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Band I“. Frankfurt AM Main: Suhrkamp Verlag, 1982 [1981].
HABERMAS, J. „Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Band II“. Frankfurt AM Main: Suhrkamp Verlag, 1988 [1981].
HELD, V. “The Public Interest and Individual Interests”. New York: Basic Books, 1970.
HERMAN, A. “The Cave and the Light: Plato versus Aristotle, and the Struggle for the Soul of Western Civilization”. New York: Random House, 2013.
HEYMAN, S. J. “The First Duty of Government: Protection, Liberty and the Fourteenth Amendment.” Duke Law Journal, 41, 1991, pp. 507-571.
HOBBES, T. “De Cive/Philosophical Rudiments Concerning Government and Society”. Garden City, NY: Anchor Doubleday, 1972 [1642/1651].
HOBBES, T. “Leviathan”. Reissued. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998 [1651].
HOBBES, T. “The Elements of Law, Natural and Politic”. 2nd modern edition. London: Cass, 1969 [1640].
HUME, D. “An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals”. Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company, 1983 [1751].
JAMES, W. “Pragmatism: A New Name for Some Old Ways of Thinking”. New York: Longmans, Green, and Co., 1908.
KANT, I. “Idea for a Universal History with a Cosmopolitan Aim.” In: Kant’s Idea for a Universal History with a Cosmopolitan Aim: A Critical Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009 [1784], pp. 10-23.
KAPLAN, M. A. “Some Problems of the Extreme Utilitarian Position.” Ethics, 70 (3), 1960, pp. 228-232.
LASSWELL, H. D. “The Public Interest: Proposing Principles of Content and Procedure.” In: The Public Interest. Nomos V. New York: Atherton Press, 1962. pp. 54-79.
LLOYD, S. A. “Ideals as interests in Hobbes’s Leviathan: The power of mind over matter”. Cambridge University Press, 1992.
LLOYD, S. A. “Egoism.” In: The Bloomsbury Companion to Hobbes. London/New York: Bloomsbury, 2013. pp. 125-127.
LYOTARD, J.-F. «La condition postmoderne: Rapport sur le savoir». Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit, 2018 [1979].
MORONI, S. “Towards a Reconstruction of the Public Interest Criterion.” Planning Theory, 3 (2), 2004, pp. 151-171.
NOZICK, R. “Anarchy, State and Utopia”. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd., 1999 [1974].
O’FLYNN, I. “Deliberating about the Public Interest.” Res Publica, 16, 2010, pp. 299-315.
PETTIT, P. “On the People’s Terms: A Republican Theory and Model of Democracy”. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
PETTIT, P. “The Common Good.” In: Justice and Democracy: Essays for Brian Barry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004. pp. 150-169.
PLAMENATZ, J. “Machiavelli, Hobbes, and Rousseau”. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
PLATO. “Republic”. Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company, 1992.
RACHELS, J. “Created from Animals: The Moral Implications of Darwinism”. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, 1990.
RAWLS, J. “A Theory of Justice”. Revised edition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999 [1971].
ROUSSEAU, J.-J. “Discourse on Political Economy and The Social Contract”. Reissue. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999 [1762].
RUNCIMAN, D. “The Concept of the State: The Sovereignty of a Fiction.” In Q. Skinner and B. Stråth (eds.). States and Citizens: History, Theory, Prospects (pp. 28-38). Cambridge University Press, 2003.
SANTORO, D., KUMAR, M. “Speaking Truth to Power: A Theory of Whistleblowing”. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2018.
SCHROCK, T. S. “The Rights to Punish and Resist Punishment in Hobbes’s Leviathan.” Political Research Quarterly, 44 (4), 1991, pp. 853-890.
SREEDHAR, S. “Hobbes on Resistance: Defying the Leviathan”. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
VIEIRA, M. B. “The Elements of Representation in Hobbes: Aesthetics, Theatre, Law, and Theology in the Construction of Hobbes’s Theory of the State”. Brill, 2009.
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2026 Revista Kriterion
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
