Epistemological and Aesthetic Issues within the Philosophy of Martial Arts

Authors

Keywords:

Martial Arts, virtue epistemology, social epistemology, beauty, Proprioceptive Art

Abstract

In this article, the reader will find an introductory and non-exhaustive approach to epistemological and aesthetic issues “embodied” in the Martial Arts, in a way that a non-philosopher could follow the discussion, but with enough depth to interest a trained philosopher. The reader will also find suggestions on how to address some of these “embodied” issues using well-known philosophical theories or hybrid versions of them. More specifically, in Epistemology, we examine the relationships between knowing-that and knowing-how in martial practices, the connection between epistemic vices and virtues within the epistemic structure of martial communities, and how we can combine the teaching of falsificationism and epistemic virtues to combat vices within these structures. In Aesthetics, in turn, we deal with the problem of pointing out where the beauty lies in the practice of Martial Arts, touching on positions such as formalism, functionalism, and relativism, a metaphysical problem about the place of kata within the Martial Arts relating it to the possibility that kata are practices that can be classified as Proprioceptive Arts.

References

ARISTÓTELES. “Ética a Nicômaco”. Tradução de Leonel Vallandro Bornheim da versão inglesa de W. D. Ross. 4ª edição. São Paulo: Nova Cultural, 1991.

ANGIONI, L. “As quatro causas na filosofia da natureza de Aristóteles”. Anais de Filosofia Clássica, 5, 10, 2011, pp. 1-19.

BIRCH, J. E. “Skills – do we really know what kind of knowledge they are?”. Sports, Ethics and Philosophy, 10, 3, 2016, pp. 237-250.

CASSAM, Q. “Epistemic Insouciance”. Journal of Philosophical Research, 43, 2018, pp. 1-20.

GETTIER, E. “Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?”. Analysis, 23, 6, 1963, pp.121-3.

GRECO, J. “Achieving Knowledge: A Virtue-Theoretic Account of Epistemic Normativity”. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.

HASHI, H. “The Significance of “mushin”: The Essential Mind of Zen Buddhist Philosophy for Humans in a Contemporary World”. Asian Studies, 4, 1, 2016, pp. 97-112.

LUZ, A. M.; VIDEIRA, L. S. Filosofia e/das artes marciais. MARTINS, C.; LUZ, A. M. On Fight/Da Luta. Lisboa: AFDLP, 2025, pp. 57-97.

MARTÍNKOVÁ, I.; PARRY, J. “Martial Categories: Clarification and Classification”. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, 43, 1, 2016a, pp. 143-162.

___________. “The Paradox of Martial Arts – safe combat”. Journal of Martial Arts Anthropology, 16, 4, 2016b, pp. 4-10.

NOË, A. “Strange Tools: Art and Human Nature”. New York: Hill and Wang, 2015.

PLATÃO. “O Banquete”. Tradução, apresentação e notas de Irley F. Franco e Jaa Torrano a partir do texto estabelecido e anotado por John Burnet. Rio de Janeiro: Editora PUC-RIO, 2021.

POPPER, K. R. “Conjecturas e refutações”. Tradução de Sérgio Bath. Brasília: Editora da UnB, 1980.

PRIEST, G.; Young, D. (eds.). “Martial Arts and Philosophy”. Chicago and La Salle: Open Court, 2010

RUSSELL, G. “Epistemic Viciousness in the Martial Arts”. In: G. PRIEST, D. YOUNG (eds.), 2010. pp. 129-144.

SAGAN, C., DRUYAN, A. “O Mundo Assombrado pelos Demônios: A Ciência Vista como Uma Vela no Escuro”. Tradução de Rosaura Eichenberg. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 1996.

SCHRENK, M. “Is Proprioceptive Art Possible?”. In: G. PRIEST, D. YOUNG (eds.), 2014. pp. 133-154.

SOSA, E. “Epistemologia da virtude: crença apta e conhecimento reflexivo”, Vol. I. Trad. Luiz Paulo Rouanet. São Paulo: Edições Loyola, 2013.

STANLEY, J. “Know How”. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.

Published

2026-09-01

Issue

Section

Artigos

How to Cite

Epistemological and Aesthetic Issues within the Philosophy of Martial Arts. Revista Kriterion, [S. l.], v. 67, n. 164, 2026. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/article/view/61788. Acesso em: 18 oct. 2026.