AGAINST THE REDUCTIONISTIC INTERPRETATION OF DAVID HUME’S EXPERIMENTAL METHOD
Keywords:
Experience , Methodological maxim, Introspection, Observation, SympathyAbstract
A restricted interpretation of Humean methodology understands his experimentalism solely in terms of reducing epistemic statements to private sensory impressions accessible via introspection. My aim is to revise this interpretation by means of criticizing the connection it establishes between the maxim of not going beyond experience and the copy principle. I will show that this interpretation is inconsistent with the way Hume conceives the experimental method, since there is textual evidence to affirm that experience should not be understood in terms of sensory impressions only, and that the science of human nature is not restricted to the study of the mental contents only, but it is nourished in the same way by the observation of social interaction. Finally, I will argue that the method Hume proposes does not prevent intersubjective verification of the empirical evidence, since the principle of sympathy enables the communication of mental states, which makes them devoid of their private character.
Downloads
References
AYER, A. (1936). “Lenguaje, verdad y lógica.” Buenos Aires: Eudeba, 1965.
BAIER, A. “A Progress of Sentiments. Reflections on Hume's Treatise.” Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1991.
BARFOOT, M. “Hume and the Culture of Science”. En: M. A. Stewart (ed.), 1990, pp. 151-190.
BIRO, J. “Hume’s New Science of the Mind.” En D. F. Norton y J. Taylor (eds.), 2009, pp. 40-69.
BOEHM, M. “Hume’s Foundational Project in the Treatise.” European Journal of Philosophy, 24 (1), 2013, pp. 55-77.
CALVENTE, S. “La experiencia en la concepción del conocimiento de David Hume. Niveles personales, sentidos y funciones.” Tesis para acceder al grado de doctora en filosofía. Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, 2017a. Recuperada de: http://www.memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/tesis/te.1364/te.1364.pdf
______. “Algunas precisiones acerca de la filosofía moral experimental de David Hume.” Manuscrito. Revista internacional de filosofía 40 (3), 2017b, pp. 51-86.
CARLIN, L. “The Empiricists: A Guide for the Perplexed.” Londres: Continuum, 2009.
CARR, D. “Experience and History. Phenomenological Perspectives on the Historical World.” Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
DE PIERRIS, G. “Ideas, Evidence and Method. Hume’s Skepticism and Naturalism Concerning Knowledge and Causation.” Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.
DEMETER, T. “Hume’s Experimental Method.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 20 (3), 2012, pp. 577-599.
______. “David Hume and the Culture of Scottish Newtonianism.” Boston, Brill, 2016.
______. “The Science in Hume’s Science of Man.” The Journal of Scottish Philosophy, 18 (3), 2020, pp. 257-271.
DICKER, G. “Hume’s Epistemology and Metaphysics. An Introduction.” Londres: Routledge, 1998.
EAKER, E. “Public and Private Meaning in Hume: Comments on Ted Morris’ ‘Meaning (fullness) without Metaphysics: Another Look at Hume’s Meaning-Empiricism’.” Philosophia, 37, 2009, pp. 455-457.
FLEW, A. “Impressions or Experiences: Public or Private?” Hume Studies 11 (2), 1985, pp. 183-191.
HAZONY, Y. “Newtonian Explanatory Reduction and Hume’s System of the Sciences.” En Z. Wiener y E. Schliesser (eds.), 2014, pp. 138-170.
HUME, D (1739-40). “A Treatise of Human Nature” [T]. Editado por D. F. Norton y Mary J. Norton, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007. Traducción al español de F. Duque, Orbis: Buenos Aires, 1984. Citado por libro, volumen, sección, párrafo y paginación de la edición de Selby-Bigge.
______. (1740). “Resumen del Tratado de la naturaleza humana” [ABST]. Edición bilingüe de J. L. Tasset. Barcelona: Literatura y Ciencia/Montesinos, 1999. Citado por número de párrafo.
______. (1748) “An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding” [EHU]. Editado por T. L. Beauchamp. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999. Traducción al español de J. Salas Ortueta, Alianza: Madrid, 1980. Citado por sección y número de párrafo.
______. (1751). “An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals” [EPM]. Editado por T. Beauchamp. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998. Traducción al español de M. Mendoza Hurtado, Bernal: Universidad Nacional de Quilmes/Prometeo, 2015. Citado por sección y número de párrafo.
______. (1754-62). “History of England,” 6 vols [HE]. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1983. Citado por volumen, capítulo y número de página.
LANDY, D. “Hume’s Science of Human Nature. Scientific Realism, Reason, and Substantial Explanation.” Nueva York: Routledge, 2018.
NEWTON, I. (1687). “Principios matemáticos de la Filosofía natural.” Estudio preliminar, traducción y notas de A. Escohotado. Madrid: Tecnos, 1995.
______. (1730). “Opticks, or a Treatise of the Reflections, Refractions, Inflections and Colours of Light.” Nueva York: Dover, 1952.
NORTON, D. F. y Taylor, J. (eds.) “The Cambridge Companion to Hume. Second Edition.” Nueva York: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
NOXON, J. “Hume’s Philosophical Development. A study of his methods.” Londres: Oxford University Press, 1973. Traducción al español de C. Solís, Madrid: Alianza, 1987.
OTT, W. “Causation and Laws of Nature in Early Modern Philosophy.” Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.
OWEN, D. “Hume’s Reason.” Nueva York: Oxford University Press, 1999.
______. “Hume and the Mechanics of Mind. Impressions, Ideas and Association.” En D. F. Norton y J. Taylor (eds.), 2009, pp. 70-104.
PITSON, A. “Sympathy and Other Selves.” Hume Studies, 22 (2), 1996, pp. 255-272.
POOVEY, M. “A History of the Modern Fact. Problems of Knowledge in the Sciences of Wealth and Society.” Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1998.
QU, H. “Prescription, Description, and Hume’s Experimental Method.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 24 (2), 2016, pp. 279-301.
______. “Hume on Mental Transparency.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 98 (4), 2017, pp. 576-601.
RÁBADE ROMERO, S. “La noción de experiencia en el empirismo inglés: Hume.” Diálogos, IX (24), 1977, pp. 33-51.
RODRÍGUEZ VALLS, F. “Experiencia y conocimiento en David Hume.” Thémata. Revista de filosofía, 8, 1991, pp. 45-67.
SAPADIN, E “A Note on Newton, Boyle, and Hume’s ‘Experimental Method’.” Hume Studies, 23 (2), 1997, pp. 337-44.
SLAVOV, M. “Newtonian and non Newtonian Elements in Hume.” The Journal of Scottish Philosophy, 14 (3), 2016, pp. 276-296.
STEWART, M. A. (ed.) “Studies in the Philosophy of the Scottish Enlightenment.” Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990.
STEWART, M. A. y Wright, John P. (eds.), “Hume and Hume’s Connexions.” Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University Press, 1994.
STROUD, B. “Hume.” Londres: Routledge & Keagan Paul, 1977.
TASSET, J. L. “Estudio introductorio.” En Hume, D., 1999, pp. 35-108.
TRAIGER, S. “The Ownership of Perceptions: A Study of Hume’s Metaphysics.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 5 (1), 1998, pp. 41-51.
WIENER, Z. y Schliesser, E. (eds.). “Newton and Empiricism.” Nueva York: Oxford University Press, 2014.
WOOD, P. “The Natural History of Man in the Scottish Enlightenment.” History of Science, 28, 1989, pp. 89-123.
______. “Hume, Reid, and the Science of the Man”. En M. A. Stewart y J. P. Wright (eds.), 1994, pp. 119-139.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Kriterion
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
