TRUTH, BELIEF, AND ACCURACY
SCIENTIFIC REALISM MEETS THE PHILOSOPHY OF MEASUREMENTS
Keywords:
Philosophy of Science, Philosophy of Measurement, Scientific Realism, AccuracyAbstract
The current debate on scientific realism is an entire universe. A general thesis can be put like follows: scientific activity attains a world that is independent of science itself. This “reaching out” can be thought of in terms of theoretical practices, such as the formulation of true theories, and/or experimental practices, such as the construction of sufficiently accurate methods to (re)formulate and test what is said by the theories. By this latter route, the debate about scientific realism in the philosophy of science meets the discussions in the philosophy of measurement, an autonomous research area that investigates measurement practices, their concepts, applications and assumptions. As the “realism” in philosophy of science in general, there are multiple postures that can be characterized as “realists” through their theorizations about scientific measurements. Stating which there are and in what they are distinct is a difficult task, since the central criteria and reasons why these positions claim to be realists are not clear. This article is an attempt to do that, without exhausting the discussion and the field.
Downloads
References
ARROYO, R. “Is Coronavirus an object? Metametaphysics meets medical sciences”. Voluntas, Vol. 11, Nr. 7, pp. 1-8, 2020.
BATITISKY, V. “Measurement in Carnap’s late Philosophy of Science”. Dialectica, Vol. 54, Nr. 1, pp. 87-108, 2000.
______. “Empiricism and the myth of fundamental measurement”. Synthese, Vol. 116, Nr. 1, pp. 51-73, 1998.
BORGE, B. “Realismo Científico y Leyes de la Naturaleza: de la Filosofía General de la Ciencia a la Metafísica de la Ciencia”. Revista Colombiana de Filosofía de la Ciencia, Vol. 20, Nr. 40, pp. 11-20, 2020.
BORGE, B., CANI, R. “Laws of Nature: Metaphysics and Epistemology”. Principia, Vol. 23, Nr. 3, pp. 367-372, 2019.
BYERLY, C., LAZARA, V. “Realist Foundations of Measurement”. Philosophy of Science, Vol. 40, pp. 10-28, 1973.
CAMPBELL, N. “Physics: The Elements”. London: Cambridge University Press, 1920.
CARTWRIGHT, N., CHANG, H. “Measurement”. In: CURD, M., PSILLOS, S. (orgs.). The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Science. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge, 2013. pp. 411-419.
CARTWRIGHT, N.; RUNHARDT, R. “Measurement”. In: CARTWRIGHT, N.,MONTUSCHI, E. (orgs.). Philosophy of Social Science: a new introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014. pp. 265-287.
CHAKRAVARTTY, A. “Scientific Realism”. In: ZALTA, E. (ed.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2017. Disponível em: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2017/entries/scientific-realism/ (Acessado em 15 de fevereiro de 2019).
CHAKRAVARTTY, A., VAN FRAASSEN, B. “What is Scientific Realism?”. Spontaneous Generations, Vol. 9, Nr. 1, pp. 12-25, 2018.
CHANG, H. “Is Water H2O? Evidence, Realism and Pluralism”. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, v. 293. London: Springer, 2012.
______. “Preservative Realism and Its Discontents: Revisiting Caloric”. Philosophy of Science, Vol. 70, pp. 902-912, 2003.
______. “Realism for Realistic People”. Spontaneous Generations, Vol. 9, Nr. 1, pp. 31-34, 2018.
CREASE, R. “A Medida do Mundo: a Busca por um Sistema Universal de Pesos e Medidas”. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar, 2013.
DOMOTOR, Z., BATITSKY, V. “The Analytic Versus Representational Theory of Measurement: A Philosophy of Science Perspective”. Measurement Science Review, Vol. 8, Nr. 6, pp. 129-146, 2008.
DUHEM, P. “Algumas Reflexões Sobre as Teorias Físicas”. Trad. Marta da Rocha e Silva e Mônica Fuchs. Ciência e Filosofia, Vol. 4, pp. 13-37, 1989.
GHINS, M. “Scientific Representation and Realism”. Principia, Vol. 15, Nr. 3, pp. 461-477, 2011.
HAACK, S. “Defending Science – Within Reason: Between Scientism and Cynicism”. New York: Prometheus Books, 2007.
HACKING, I. “Experimentation and Scientific Realism”. Philosophical Topics, Vol. 13, Nr. 1, pp. 71-87, 1982.
INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE METROLOGIA, QUALIDADE E TECNOLOGIA. “JCGM: 100 – 2008. Avaliação de dados de medição: Guia para a expressão de incerteza de medição – GUM 2008”. Duque de Caxias, INMETRO, 2012a.
______. “JCGM: 200 – 2012. Vocabulário Internacional de Metrologia: Conceitos fundamentais e gerais e termos associados – VIM 2012”. 3 ed. Duque de Caxias, INMETRO, 2012b.
KYBURG, H. “Quantities, Magnitudes, and Numbers”. Philosophy of Science, Vol. 64, pp. 377-410, 1977.
MARI, L., EHRLICH, C., PENDRILL, L. “Measurement Units as Quantities of Objects or Values of Quantities: A Discussion”. Metrologia, Vol. 55, Nr. 55, 2018.
MICHELL, J. “The Logic of Measurement: A Realist Overview”. Measurement, Vol. 38, pp. 285-294, 2005.
PINHEIRO, F. “O que significa ser realista sobre as medições científicas: uma taxonomia para posicionamentos (antir)realistas”. Perspectiva Filosófica, Vol. 45, Nr. 1, pp. 1-30, 2018.
PSILLOS, S. “Scientific Realism: How Science Tracks Truth”. London: Routledge, 1999.
QUINN, T. “From Artefacts to Atoms – A new SI for 2018 to be Based on Fundamental Constants”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, Vol. 65-66, pp. 8-20, 2017.
SUPPES, P. “Measurement, theory of”. In: TAYLOR; F. (ed). Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 1998. Disponível em: https://www.rep.routledge.com/articles/thematic/measurement-theory-of/v-1 (Acessado em 20 de dezembro de 2017).
SWOYER, C. “The Metaphysics of Measurement: Essays on Measurement in the Social and Physical Sciences”. In: FORGE, J. (org.). Measurement, Realism and Objectivity. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1987. pp. 235-290.
TAL, E. “A Model-based Epistemology of Measurement”. In: MÖßNER, N., NORDMANN, A. (eds.). Reasoning in Measurement. London: Pickering & Chatto Publishers, 2017. pp. 236-251.
______. “How Accurate Is the Standard Second?”. Philosophy of Science, Vol. 78, Nr. 5, pp. 1082-1096, 2011.
______. “Measurement in Science”. In: ZALTA, E. (ed.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2020. Disponível em: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/measurementscience (Acessado em 30 de novembro de 2020).
______. “Old and New Problems in Philosophy of Measurement”. Philosophy Compass, Vol. 8, pp. 1159-1173, 2013.
TELLER, P. “Measurement Accuracy Realism”. In: PESCHARD, I.; VAN FRAASSEN, B. (orgs.). The Experimental Side of Modeling. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press, 2018. Disponível em: https://manifold.umn.edu/projects/the-experimental-sideof-modeling (Acessado em 12 de dezembro de 2020).
VAN BRAKEL, J. “Norms and facts in measurement”. Measurement, Vol. 2, pp. 45-51, 1984.
VAN FRAASSEN, B. “Introduction: The Changing Debates about Measurement”. In: PESCHARD, I., VAN FRAASSEN, B. (orgs.). The Experimental Side of Modeling. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press, 2018a. Disponível em: https://manifold.umn.edu/projects/the-experimental-side-of-modeling (Acessado em 12 de dezembro de 2020).
______. “Let’s Take the Metaphysical Bull by the Horns”. In: PESCHARD, I., VAN FRAASSEN, B. (orgs.). The Experimental Side of Modeling. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press, 2018b. Disponível em: https://manifold.umn.edu/projects/theexperimental-side-of-modeling (Acessado em 12 de dezembro de 2020).
______. “Scientific Representation: Paradoxes of Perspective”. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
WOLFF, J. “The Metaphysics of Quantities”. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020.
WRIGHT, C. “Truth and Objectivity”. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Kriterion
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
