SETTING THE SCENE THROUGH INTERVAL WRITING AND EMANCIPATORY APPARITION

JACQUES RANCIÈRE’S AESTHETICPOLITICAL METHOD

Authors

Keywords:

Jacques Rancière, Scene, Writing, Appearance, Method

Abstract

Based on Rancière’s most recent reflections, carried out
mainly between 2017 and 2020, the article systematizes the main axes of the construction of his method, which consists of articulating heterogeneous singularities in scenes originated in the confluence of his writing with the dissenting appearance of political subjects. We argue that Rancière elaborates, through anti-hierarchical writing, a work of disturbing the “explanatory machine” (2016, p.68) that sustains specialized speeches and their different translations into languages that insist on maintaining an order that controls who can appear on the scene, updating the separations between spatialities, temporalities and corporeality. His writing and his methodological gesture can
help understand how research based on the montage of controversial scenes takes the risk of producing egalitarian topographies in which the researcher’s words slide between the words of various subjects, of various texts and of various experiences.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Ângela Cristina Salgueiro Marques, UFMG

Professora do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Comunicação Social da UFMG. P´ós-doutora em Ciências da Informação e da Comunicação pela Université Stendhal, Grenoble III. Bolsista do CNPq.

References

BENJAMIN, W. “Obras escolhidas II”. Trad. José Carlos Martins Barbosa. São Paulo: Brasiliense, 1987.

CALDERÓN, A. S. “La performatividad de las imágenes”. Santiago de Chile: Ediciones Metales Pesados, 2020.

CHAMBERS, S. “The Lessons of Rancière”. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.

DERANTY, J-P; ROSS, A. (eds.). “Jacques Rancière and the contemporary scene: the philosophy of radical equality”. London, Continuum International Publishing Group, 2012.

FOUCAULT, M. “Le jeu de Michel Foucault”. Entrevista concedida à revista Ornicar. Dits et Écrits, Vol. 3, pp. 194-228, [1977] 1994.

GAGNEBIN, J. M. “Sobre a noção de Spielraum em Walter Benjamin: resistência e inventividade”. In: SOUZA, R. T. et al. (orgs). Walter Benjamin: barbárie e memória ética. Porto Alegre: Ed. Zouk, 2020. pp. 63-73.

HUSSAK, P. “Produção estética, emancipação e imagem em Jacques Rancière”. In: SIMÃO, L. (org.). Horizontes da arte: práticas artísticas em devir. Rio de Janeiro: NAU, 2011. pp. 92-104.

PANAGIA, D. “Rancière’s sentiments”. London: Duke University Press, 2018.

QUINTANA, L. “Jacques Rancière and the emancipation of bodies. Philosophy and Social Criticism, Vol. 45, Nr. 2, pp. 212-238, 2019.

RANCIÈRE, J. “Louis-Gabriel Gauny. Le philosophe plébéin”. Paris: La Découverte-Maspero/Université de Vincennes, 1985.

______. “A Noite dos Proletários”. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 1988.

______. “Dissenting words: a conversation with Davide Panagia”. Diacritics, Vol. 30, Nr. 2, pp. 113-126, 2000.

______. “Ten Theses on Politics”. Theory & Event, Vol. 5, Nr. 3, pp. 1-13, 2001.

______. “La scène révolutionnaire et l’ouvrier émancipé (1830-1848)”. Tumultes, Nr. 20, pp. 49-72, 2003.

______. “Aux bords du politique”. Paris: Gallimard (Folio essais), 2004.

______. “The method of equality: an answer to some questions”. In: ROCKHILL, G.,

WATTS, P. (eds.). Jacques Rancière: History, Politics, Aesthetics. Duke University Press, 2009a. pp. 273-288.

______. “Et tant pis pour les gens fatiguées”. Paris: Éditions Amsterdam, 2009b.

______. «Ten Thesis on politics». In: CORCORAN, S. (ed.). Dissensus: on politics and aesthetics. London: Continuum, 2010. pp. 27-43.

______. “The thinking of dissensus: politics and aesthetics”. In: BOWMAN, P.; STAMP, R. (eds.). Reading Rancière. London: Continuum International Publishing Group, 2011. pp. 1-17.

______. “O espectador emancipado”. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2012.

______. “Aisthesis: scenes from the aesthetic regime of art”. London: Verso, 2013a.

______. “Béla Tarr: o tempo do depois”. Lisboa: Orfeu Negro, 2013b.

______. “Le fil perdu: essais sur la fiction moderne”. Paris: La Fabrique, 2013c.

______. “The method of equality”. Interviews with Laurent Jeanpierre and Dork Zabunyan. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2016.

______. “Les bords de la fiction”. Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 2017.

______. “O desmedido momento”. Serrote, Nr. 28, pp. 77-97, 2018a.

______. “La Méthode de la scène”. Paris: Éditions Lignes, 2018b.

______. “Le temps modernes”. Paris: La Fabrique, 2018c.

______. “Le travail des images. Conversations avec Andrea Soto Calderón”. Dijon: Les Presses du Réel, 2019a.

______. “El tiempo de los no-vencidos”. Revista de Estudios Sociales, Nr. 70, pp. 79-86, 2019b.

______. “El litigio de las palabras: diálogo sobre la política del lenguaje”. Entrevista a Javier Bassas. Barcelona: Ned Ediciones, 2019c.

______. “La pensée des bords (entretien avec Fabienne Brugère)”. Critique, Nr. 881, pp. 828-840, 2020.

______. “Pedro Costa : les chambres du cinéaste”. Paris, Montreuil: Les éditions de l’oeil, 2022.

ROSS, A. “Acting Through Inaction: The Distinction Between Leisure and Reverie in Jacques Rancière’s Conception of Emancipation”. Journal of French and Francophone Philosophy, Vol. 27, Nr. 2, pp. 76-94, 2019.

RUBY, C. “L’interruption: Jacques Rancière et la politique”. Paris: La Fabrique, 2009.

VOIGT, A. F. “O conceito de ‘cena’ na obra de Jacques Rancière: a prática do ‘método da igualdade’». Kriterion, Vol. 60, Nr. 142, pp. 23-41, 2019.

Published

2023-05-29

How to Cite

MARQUES, Ângela C. S. SETTING THE SCENE THROUGH INTERVAL WRITING AND EMANCIPATORY APPARITION: JACQUES RANCIÈRE’S AESTHETICPOLITICAL METHOD. Revista Kriterion, [S. l.], v. 64, n. 154, 2023. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/article/view/35326. Acesso em: 17 jul. 2024.

Issue

Section

Artigos