THE ANCIENT SCEPTIC ATTITUDE AND DISAGREEMENT
Keywords:
Socrates, Expert, Dissent, Suspensión of Judgement, Pyrrhonism, ScepticismAbstract
It is argued that a philosophical “sceptic attitude”, found
originally in the Socratic approach and arguably in the Pyrrhonist’s treatment of disagreement, should be taken to be an epistemically positive attitude in the sense that it fosters a serious philosophical examination of what is taken to be true, without entailing the radical scepticism often associated with it. We argue that if the two sides of a disagreement are equivalent (at that moment, given
the evidence available), it doesn’t require one to consider the disagreement as undecidable without qualification and so to suspend judgment indefinitely. If this is so, we claim, the Pyrrhonian disagreement-based position will be significantly restricted as a form of scepticism and should instead be seen as promoting an epistemically propitious sceptic attitude.
Downloads
References
ANNAS, J., BARNES, J. The Modes of Scepticism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
BARNES, J., The Toils of Scepticism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
BETT, Richard, Pyrrho. His Antecedents and His Legacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
BOGARDUS, T. “A Vindication of the Equal-Weight View”. Episteme, 6 (3), pp. 324-335, 2009.
BOLZANI FILHO, R. Acadêmicos versus Pirrônicos, Sâo Paulo: Alameda Casa Editorial, 2013.
BOWLES, S., GINTIS, H. A Cooperative Species: Human Reciprocity and Its Evolution. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 2011.
BURNYEAT, M. Explorations in Ancient and Modern Philosophy (Vol. 1). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
BURNYEAT, M. “Protagoras and self-refutation in later Greek philosophy”. In: M. BURNYEAT, 2012. pp. 3-19. (= Burnyeat 2012a)
BURNYEAT, M. “Can the Sceptic live his Scepticism?”. In: M. BURNYEAT, 2012. pp. 205-235. (= Burnyeat 2012b)
COADY, D. What to Believe Now: Applying Epistemology to Contemporary Issues. Chicester: Wiley, 2012.
CRAIG, E. Knowledge and the State of Nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990.
FELDMAN, R. “The Ethics of Belief”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 60 (3), pp. 667-695, 2000.
FOGELIN, R. J. Pyrrhonian Reflexions on Knowledge and Justification. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994.
FRICKER, M. “The Value of Knowledge and the Test of Time”. In: O’HEAR, A. (ed.) Epistemology: Royal Institute of Philosophy Lectures 2006/7. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009. pp. 125-142.
GOLDMAN, A. “Experts: Which Ones Should You Trust?”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 63, 1, pp.85–110, 2001.
JAMES, W. The Will to Believe and Other Essays in Popular Philosophy. New York: Longmans, 1897.
JAMES, W. “The Will to Believe”. In: JAMES, 1897. pp. 43-67.
KAHN, C. Plato and the Socratic Dialogue. The Philosophical Use of a Literary Form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
KELLY, T. “Evidence Can Be Permissive”. In: STEUP, M., TURRI, J., SOSA, E. Contemporary Debates in Epistemology. Second Edition. Malden (MA): Blackwell, 2014. pp.298-311.
LACKEY, J. “A Justificationist View of Disagreement’s Epistemic Significance”. In: HADDOCK, A., MILLAR, A., PRITCHARD, D. (eds.) Social Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010. pp.209-230.
LAMMENRANTA, M. “The Role of Disagreement in Pyrrhonian and Cartesian Skepticism”. In: D.E. MACHUCA, 2013. pp. 46-65.
MACHUCA, D.E. (ed.) Disagreement and Skepticism. New York: Routledge, 2013
MACHUCA, D.E. “A Neo-Pyrrhonian Approach to the Epistemology of Disagreement”. In: D.E. MACHUCA, 2013. pp. 66-89.
MATES, B. The Skeptic Way. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.
NIKULIN, D. Dialectic and Dialogue. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2010.
PELLEGRIN, P. Sextus Empiricus. Esquisses pyrrhoniennes. Paris. Éditions du Seuil, 1997.
PRITCHARD, D. Epistemic Luck. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.
SEDLEY, D. The Midwife of Platonism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.
TUOMELA, R. The Philosophy of Sociality: The Shared Point of View. New York: OUP, 2007.
THORSRUD, H. “Arcesilaus and Carneades”. In: BETT, Richard (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Scepticism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010. pp. 58-80.
WHITE, R. “Epistemic Permissiveness.” Philosophical Perspectives, 19, pp. 445–459, 2005.
WILLIAMS, B. Truth and Truthfulness. New Jersey Princeton: University Press, 2002.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Kriterion
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
