ANTHROPOLOGY, OBSTINACY AND NATURE
CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENTS IN OSKAR NEGT AND ALEXANDER KLUGE’S CRITICAL THEORY
Keywords:
Negt and Kluge, Anthropology, Obstinacy, Primitive Accumulation, NatureAbstract
This article reconstructs Oskar Negt and Alexander Kluge’s critical theory by articulating some of the key concepts of History and Obstinacy, their second collaboration. The objective is to detail the grounds of their critical theory and to show how it acquires its normative character. To this aim, in a first step I reconstruct the basis of the anthropology developed by Negt and Kluge. This anthropology allows them to argue that subjects—insofar as they are creative beings—poses ‘obstinacy’, which they understand as an intrinsic and material power to resist oppression. Following this, I discuss the concept of ‘primitive accumulation’, which is used by Negt and Kluge to expose the relation between capitalism and obstinacy. Finally, I clarify the way Negt and Kluge appeal to the concept of ‘human nature’ in order to show how does their theory derive its normative character. To do so, I rely on Christoph Menke’s work on ‘inner nature’.
Downloads
References
ADORNO, Th., HORKHEIMER, M. “Dialéctica de La Ilustración. Fragmentos Filosóficos”. Madrid: Trotta, 1998.
______. ‘Towards a New Manifesto?’ en New Left Review, 65, 2010, pp. 33-61.
ADORNO, Th. “Compromiso” en Notas sobre literatura. Obra completa 11. Madrid: Akal, 2003, pp. 393-413.
_______. “Dialéctica Negativa”. Madrid: Taurus, 1984.
_______. “¿Capitalismo tardío o Sociedad industrial?” En: Escritos sociológicos, vol. 1. Madrid: Akal, 2004, pp. 330-344.
_______. “Sociology and Psychology”. New Left Review I/46, 1967, pp. 67-97.
BOWIE, A. “Kluge and Negt 30 Years On. A Brief Reflection.” En: Glass Shards: Echoes of a Message in a Bottle. Alexander Kluge-Jahrbuch vol. 2. Göttingen: V&R Unipress, 2015, pp. 77-82.
_______. “Adorno and the Ends of Philosophy”. Cambridge: Polity, 2013.
_______. “Reseña de Geschichte und Eigensinn, de Oskar Negt y Alexander Kluge”, Telos 66, 1985, pp. 183-190.
CLAUSSEN, D., MAISO, J. “Critical theory and lived experience. Interview with Detlev Claussen”, Radical Philosophy, 2.06, 2019, pp. 63-82.
DEWS, P. “Power and Subjectivity in Foucault”, New Left Review, I/144, 1984, pp. 72-95.
FLECK, A. “Resignação? Práxis e política na teoria crítica tardia de Theodor W. Adorno”, Kriterion, Nr. 138, 2017, pp. 467-490.
FORE, D. “‘Introducción’ a History and Obstinacy de Alexander Kluge and Oskar Negt”. New York: Zone Books, 2014.
FREYENHAGEN, F. «‘Adorno’s Critique of Late Capitalism: Negative, Explanatory and Practical». En: Conceptions of Critique in Modern and Contemporary Philosophy. Ed. K. Boer y R. Sonderegger. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012. pp. 175-192.
_______. “Adorno’s politics: Theory and praxis in Germany’s 1960s,” Philosophy & Social Criticism, Vol. 40, Nr. 9, 2014, pp. 867-893.
_______. “Adorno’s Practical Philosophy. Living Less Wrongly”. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
HARVEY, D. “The New Imperialism”. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.
HEGEL, G. W. F. “Fenomenologia del Espiritu”. Trad. W. Roces. México: Fondo de Cultura Econónomica, 1966.
_______. „Werke, Band III: Phaenomenologie des Geistes“. Frankfurt am Main: Shurkamp, 1986.
HERDER, J. G. „Vom Erkennen und Empfinden der menschlichen Seele: Bemerkungen und Träume“. Riga: bey Johann Friedrich Hartknoch, 1778.
HÖLDERLIN, F. „Sämtliche Werke: Große Stuttgarter Ausgabe“. Ed. F. Beißner. Vol. 6.1. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, 1943.
HORKHEIMER, M. “Postscript”. En: Critical Theory. Selected Essays. M. J. O’Connell et al. (trads.). New York: Continuum, 2002. pp. 244-252.
HULATT, O. “Normative Impulsivity: Adorno on Ethics and the Body,” International Journal of Philosophical Studies, Vol. 22, Nr. 5, 2014, pp. 676-695.
JAFFE, A. «Adorno’s ‘addendum’», Philosophy & Social Criticism, Vol. 43, Nr. 8, 2017, pp. 855-876.
JAMESON, F. “On Negt and Kluge”, October, 46, 1988, pp. 151-178. https://doi.org/10.2307/3108668.
JUÁREZ, E. A. “Th. W. Adorno: el elogio de la teoría y la impaciencia de la praxis,” Signos Filosóficos, Vol. XIV, Nr. 27, Enero-Junio 2012, pp. 89-118.
KLUGE, A. “The Political as Intensity of Everyday Feelings”. En: FORREST, T. (ed.). Alexander Kluge. Raw Materials for the Imagination. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2012. pp. 283-290.
_______. “Learning Processes with a Deadly Outcome”. Durham: Duke University Press, 1996.
_______. „Neue Geschichten, No. 1-18, ‘Unheimlichkeit der Zeit“. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1977.
MARTIN, S. “Political economy of life. Negt and Kluge’s History and Obstinacy”.
Radical Philosophy, 190, 2015, pp. 25-36. https://www.radicalphilosophy.com/article/political-economy-of-life.
MARX, K. “Capital: A Critique of Political Economy”. Vol. 1. En: Karl Marx and Fredrich Engels Collected Works. Vol. 35. New York: International Publishers, 2004.
_______. “Escritos de Juventud”. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 1982.
_______. “Pre-Capitalist Economic Formations”. New York: International Publishers, 1965.
MENKE, Ch. “Inner Nature and Social Normativity: The Idea of Self-Realization.”En: JOAS, H., WIEGANDT, K. (eds.). The Cultural Values of Europe, Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 2008. pp. 217-252.
MILLER, M. D. „Eigensinn in Transit. Reexamining a Concept for the Twenty-First Century”. En: LANGSTON, R. et al. (eds.), Glass Shards: Echoes of a Message in a Bottle. Alexander Kluge-Jahrbuch. Vol. 2. Göttingen: V&R unipress, 2015. pp. 83-102.
NEGT, O., KLUGE, A. “History and Obstinacy”. New York: Zone Books, 2014.
_______. „Geschichte und Eigensinn“. Frankfurt am Main: Zweitausandeins, 1981.
_______. „Maßverhältnisse des Politischen: 15 Vorschläge zum Unterscheidungsvermögen“.
Frankfurt am Main: Fischer Verlag, 1992.
_______. “Public Sphere and Experience: Toward an Analysis of the Bourgeois and Proletarian Public Sphere”. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1993.
NEGT, O. “What Is a Revival of Marxism and Why Do We Need One Today?” En: NELSON, C., GROSSBERG, L. (eds.). Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture. Hampshire: Macmillan Education, 1988. pp. 211-234.
NEGT, O. et al. “The History of Living Labor Power: A Discussion with Oskar Negt and Alexander Kluge”, October, 149, 2014, pp. 35-68. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24586528.
PAVSEK, Ch. “Negt and Kluge’s Redemption of Labor,” New German Critique, Nr. 68, 1996, pp. 137-163. https://doi.org/10.2307/3108668.
_______. “The Utopia of Film: Cinema and Its Futures in Godard, Kluge, and Tahimik”. New York: Columbia University Press, 2013.
PICKFORD, H. W. “The Dialectic of Theory and Praxis: On Late Adorno”. En: Adorno: A Critical Reader. Ed. N. Gibson y A. Rubin. London: Blackwell, 2002. pp. 312-340.
SAMANIEGO DE LA FUENTE, R. “On Negativity and Aesthetics: Kluge’s Farewell to Adorno”, Artefilosofia, Vol. 17, Nr. 31, 2022, pp. 131-173.
SCHULTE, Ch. “All Things are Enchanted Human Beings.” En: FORREST, T. (ed.) Alexander Kluge. Raw Materials for the Imagination. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2012. pp. 409-416.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Revista Kriterion
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
