Accusing the accusers
Invective, identity, and “triangulated relations” in Plato’s Apology of Socrates
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35699/1983-3636.2023.48984Palavras-chave:
Apology of Socrates, invective, identity, “triangulated relations”, inclusion, exclusion, emotionsResumo
This paper discusses an aspect of rhetoric in Plato’s Apology of Socrates: invective, the modes that the defendant uses to attack, undermine the credentials, and diminish the credibility of his accusers, namely Meletus, Anytus, and Lycon (with side attacks also being hurled against others, including Aristophanes). “Accusing the accusers” encapsulates and refers succinctly to the use of invective on the principle that the best form of defence is attack. It is, specifically, examined how invective on the part of the defendant is articulated: what elements it is made up of, how it connects with and capitalizes on the general sociocultural context in classical Athens to deconstruct the identity of the accusers, and how useful it is in triangulating relations in court between the speaker, his opponent(s), and the audience – a technique that, as argued in scholarship, has tremendous potential to affect the verdict of the judges.
Downloads
Referências
AMOSSY, R. Ethos at the Crossroads of Disciplines: Rhetoric, Pragmatics, Sociology. Poetics Today, v. 22, n. 1, p. 1-23, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/03335372-22-1-1
ARENA, V. Roman Oratorical Invective. In: DOMINIK W.; HALL J. A Companion to Roman Rhetoric. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2007. p. 149-160. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470996485.ch12
BARON, R. S. et al. Negative Emotion and Superficial Social Processing. Motivation and Emotion, v. 16, n. 4, p. 323-346, 1992. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992970
BEARD, M. Laughter in Ancient Rome: On Joking, Tickling and Cracking Up. Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London: University of California Press, 2014.
BEAUVOIR, S. The Second Sex. New York: Lancer Books, 1973.
BERKOWITZ, L. Towards a General Theory of Anger and Emotional Aggression: Implications of the Cognitive-neoassociationistic Perspective for the Analysis of Anger and Other Emotions. In: WYER, R. S.; SRULL, T. K. Perspectives on Anger and Emotion: Advances in Social Cognition. New York: Psychology Press, 1993. p. 1-46.
BLAIR, R. J. R. Considering Anger from a Cognitive Neuroscience Perspective. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, v. 3, n. 1, p. 65-74, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.154
BRICKHOUSE, T. C.; SMITH, N. D. Socrates on Trial. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1989.
BUIS, E. Rhetorical Defence, Inter-poetic Agōn and the Reframing of Comic Invective in Plato’s Apology of Socrates’. In: PAPAIOANNOU, S.; SERAFIM, A. Comic Invective in Ancient Greek and Roman Rhetoric. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter, 2021. p. 81-106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110735536-005
BURNET, J. Plato’s Euthyphro, Apology of Socrates, and Crito. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1924. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780198140153.book.1
BUTLER, J. Sex and Gender in Simone de Beauvoir’s Second Sex. Yale French Studies, v. 72, p. 35-49, 1986. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2930225
BUTLER, J. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York and London: Routledge, 1990.
CAIRNS, D. Aidōs: The Psychology and Ethics of Honour and Shame in Ancient Greek Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198146841.001.0001
CAREY, C. Nomos in Attic Rhetoric and Oratory. Journal of Hellenic Studies, v. 116, p. 33-46, 1996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/631954
CAREY, C. The Rhetoric of Diabole. In: THE INTERFACE BETWEEN PHILOSOPHY AND RHETORIC IN CLASSICAL ATHENS. An international conference organized by the University of Crete. 2004, Rethymno. <https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/3281/>.
CHRIST, M. R. The Litigious Athenian. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56021/9780801858635
CHROUST, A.-H. Socrates: A Source Problem. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly, v. 19, n. 2, p. 48-72, 1945. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/newscholas19451912
CHROUST, A.-H. Socrates, Man and Myth: The Two Socratic Apologies of Xenophon. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1957.
CLASSEN, C. J. The Speeches in the Courts of Law: A Three-cornered Dialogue. Rhetorica, v. 9, n. 3, p. 195-207, 1991. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.1991.9.3.195
CLIFFORD, J. The Predicament of Culture. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1988. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674503724
COCCARO, E.F.; NOBLETT, K. L.; MCCLOSKEY, M. S. Attributional and Emotional Responses to Socially Ambiguous Cues: Validation of a New Assessment of Social/emotional Information Processing in Healthy Adults and Impulsive Aggressive Patients. Journal of Psychiatric Research, v. 43, n. 10, p. 915-925, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2009.01.012
CONOVER, P. J. The Influence of Group Identifications on Political Perception and Evaluation. The Journal of Politics, v. 46, n. 3, p. 760-785, 1984. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2130855
CORBEILL, A. Controlling Laughter: Political Humor in the Late Roman Republic. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996.
CRAIG, C. P. Audience Expectations, Invective and Proof. In: POWELL, J. Cicero the Advocate. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004. p. 187-214. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198152804.003.0008
CROWLEY, J. Patriotism in Ancient Greece. In: SARDOC, M. Handbook of Patriotism. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing AG, 2020. p. 1-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30534-9_7-1
DANZIG, G. Apologizing for Socrates: Plato and Xenophon on Socrates’ Behavior in Court. TAPhA, v. 133, n. 2, p. 281-321, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/apa.2003.0014
DENG, F. M. War of Visions: Conflict of Identities in the Sudan. Washington, DC: Brookings, 1995.
DUSSOL, E. Petite introduction à l’invective médiévale. In: GIRARD, D.; POLLOCK, J. Invectives, quand le corps reprend la parole. Perpignan: Presses Universitaires de Perpignan, 2006. p. 160-173.
DUTSCH, D.; SUTERAND, A. Ancient Obscenities: Their Nature and Use in the Ancient Greek and Roman Worlds. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2018.
FIELD, G. C. Plato and his Contemporaries. London: Methuen, 1930.
FISHER, N. Creating a Cultural Community: Aeschines and Demosthenes. In: MICHALOPOULOS, A et al. The Rhetoric of Unity and Division in Ancient Literature. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter, 2021. p. 45-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110611168-003
GABLE, P. A.; POOLE, B.D; HARMON-JONES, E. Anger Perceptually and Conceptually Narrows Cognitive Scope. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, v. 109, n. 1, p. 163-174, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039226
GARFINKEL, S. N. et al. Anger in Brain and Body: The Neural and Physiological Perturbation of Decision-making by Emotion. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, v. 11, n. 1, p. 150-158, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsv099
GEE, J. P. Identity as an Analytic Lens for Research in Education. Review of Research in Education, v. 25, n. 99-125, 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1167322
GLEICHER, F.; PETTY, R. E. Expectations of Reassurance Influence the Nature of Fear-stimulated Attitude Change. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, v. 28, n. 1, p. 86-100, 1992. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(92)90033-G
GORDON, J. Against Vlastos on Complex Irony. The Classical Quarterly, v. 46, n. 1, p. 131-137, 1996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cq/46.1.131
GOTTLIEB, P. The Complexity of Socratic Irony: A Note on Professor Vlastos’ Account. The Classical Quarterly, v. 42, n. 1, p. 278-279, 1992. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0009838800042798
GROTE, G. Plato and the Other Companions of Socrates. London: J. Murray, 1875.
GUTHRIE, W. K. C. A History of Greek Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511518423
HALL, E. The Theatrical Cast of Athens. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199298891.001.0001
HALL, S. Cultural Identity and Cinematic Representation Framework. The Journal of Cinema and Media, v. 36, p. 68-81, 1989.
HALLIWELL, S. Greek Laughter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511483004
HARRIS, Ε. Μ. Law and Οratory. Ιn: WORTHINGTON, I. Persuasion: Greek Rhetoric in Action. London and New York: Routledge, 1994. p. 130-150.
HARVEY, D. The Sycophant and Sycophancy: Vexatious Redefinition? In: CARTLEDGE, P. M.; TODD, S. Nomos: Essays in Athenian Law, Politics, and Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990. p. 103-121.
HICKS, D. Technology and Professional Identity of Librarians: The Making of the Cybrarian. Hershey: IGI Global, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-4735-0
HOGG, M. A.; ABRAMS, D. Social Identifications: A Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations and Group Processes. London and New York: Routledge, 1988.
HUDDY, L. Group Identity and Political Cohesion. In: SEARS, D.; HUDDY, L.; JERVIS, R. Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003. p. 511-558.
HUGHES, J. J. Comedic Borrowings in Selected Orations of Cicero. 1987. 376 f. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Iowa, Iowa, 1987.
İNAÇ, H.; ÜNAL, F. The Construction of National Identity in Modern Times: Theoretical Perspective. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, v. 3, n. 11, p. 223–232, 2013.
JANIS, I. L.; FESHBACH, S. Effects of Fear-arousing Communications. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, v. 48, n. 1, p. 78-92, 1953. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0060732
JENKINS, R. Social Identity. London: Routledge, 1996.
KAHN, C. Plato and the Socratic Dialogue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511585579
KAMEN, D. Insults in Classical Athens. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv12pntcd
KANT, I. Critique of Judgment. Trans. J. C. Meredith. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1790 [1911].
KATO, S. The Apology: The Beginning of Plato’s Own Philosophy. The Classical Quarterly, v. 41, n. 2, p. 356-364, 1991. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0009838800004535
KENNEDY, G. Progymnasmata: Greek Textbooks of Prose Composition and Rhetoric. Leiden and Boston: De Gruyter, 2003.
KISH, N. The Ethics and Politics of Style in Latin Rhetorical Invective. 2018. 467 f. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles, 2018.
KONSTAN, D. Shame in Ancient Greece. Social Research, v. 70, n. 4, p. 601-630, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/sor.2003.0007
KONSTAN, D. The Emotions of the Ancient Greeks: Studies in Aristotle and Classical Literature. Toronto, Buffalo, and London: University of Toronto Press, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442674370
KONSTAN, D. Pity and the Law in Greek Theory and Practice. Dike, v. 3, p. 125-145, 2000.
KONSTAN, D.; RUTTER, K. Envy, Spite, and Jealousy: The Rivalrous Emotions in Ancient Greece. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781474469937
LANE, M. The Evolution of eirōneia in Classical Greek Texts: Why Socratic eirōneia is Not Socratic Irony. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, v. 31, p. 49-83, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199204212.003.0002
LANE, M. Reconsidering Socratic Irony. In: MORRISON, D. Cambridge Companion to Socrates. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011. p. 237-259. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL9780521833424.011
LAU, R. Individual and Contextual Influences on Group Identification. Social Psychology Quarterly, v. 52, p. 220-231, 1989. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2786717
LAUSBERG, H. Handbook of Literary Rhetoric. Leiden, Boston, and Köln: Brill, 1998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004663213
LEVENTHAL, H.; SINGER, R.; JONES, S. Effects of Fear and Specificity of Recommendation upon Attitudes and Behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, v. 2, n. 1, p. 20-29, 1965. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0022089
LOFBERG, J. O. The Sycophant-Parasite. Classical Philology, v. 15, n. 1, p. 61-72, 1920. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/360265
LOFBERG, J. O. Sycophancy in Athens. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1917.
MACDOWELL, D. M. The Law in Classical Athens. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1978.
MARTIN, G. Forms of Address in Athenian Courts. Museum Helveticum, v. 63, n. 2, p. 75-88, 2006.
MAYER, A.V.; PAULUS, F.M.; KRACH, S. A Psychological Perspective on Vicarious Embarrassment and Shame in the Context of Cringe Humor. Humanities, v. 10, n. 4, p. 110, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/h10040110
MCCOY, M. Plato on the Rhetoric of Philosophers and Sophists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511497827
MILLER, A. H.; GURIN, P.; GURIN, G.; MALANCHUK, O. Group Consciousness and Political Participation. American Journal of Political Science, v. 25, n. 3, p. 494-511, 1981. <https://doi.org/10.2307/2110816>. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2110816
MINER, J. Crowning Thersites: The Relevance of Invective in Athenian Forensic Oratory. 2006. 191 f. Ph.D. Dissertation, The University of Texas, Austin, 2006.
MORREALL, J. Comic Relief: A Comprehensive Philosophy of Humor. Malden, Oxford, and Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444307795
NOVOKHATKO, A. The Invectives of Sallust and Cicero: Critical Edition with Introduction, Translation, and Commentary. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110213263
OLDFATHER, W. Socrates in Court. Classical World, v. 31, n. 21, p. 203-211, 1938. <https://doi.org/10.2307/4340295>. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/4340295
OPELT, I. Die lateinischen Schimpfwörter und verwandte sprachliche Erscheinungen: Eine Typologie. Heidelberg: Winter, 1965.
PAPAIOANNOU, S.; SERAFIM, A. Comic Invective in Ancient Greek and Roman Oratory. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110735536
PERNOT, L. Rhetoric in Antiquity. Trans. W. E. Higgins. Washington: The Catholic University of America Press, 2005.
POWELL, G. F. Invective and the Orator: Ciceronian Theory and Practice. In: BOOTH, J. Cicero on the Attack: Invective and Subversion in the Orations and Beyond. Swansea: The Classical Press of Wales, 2007. p. 1-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvvnb8s.5
RICHLIN, A. The Garden of Priapus: Sexuality and Aggression in Roman Humor. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195068733.001.0001
RIESS, W. Performing Interpersonal Violence: Court, Curse, and Comedy in Fourth Century BCE Athens. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110245608
RIGGSBY, A. M. The Rhetoric of Character in the Roman Courts. In: POWELL, J.; PATERSON, J. Cicero the Advocate. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004. p.165-185. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198152804.003.0007
ROSEN, R. Making Mockery: The Poetics of Ancient Satire. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195309966.001.0001
RUBINSTEIN, L. Stirring up Dicastic Anger. In: CAIRNS, D. L.; KNOX, R. A. Law, Rhetoric, and Comedy in Classical Athens. Essays in Honour of Douglas M. MacDowell. Wales: Classical Press of Wales, 2004. p. 187-203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1n3587r.17
RUTHERFORD, R. B. The Art of Plato. London: Duckworth, 1995.
SANDERS, E. Envy and Jealousy in Classical Athens. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199897728.001.0001
SCHUTZ, C. E. It’s a Funny Thing. In: CHAPMAN, A.; FOOT, H. Humour: Proceedings of the International Conference on Humour. New York: Pergamon, 1977. p. 225-228.
SERAFIM, A. Attic Oratory and Performance. London and New York: Routledge, 2017a. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315738451
SERAFIM, A. Conventions’ in/ as Performance: Addressing the Audience in Selected Public Speeches of Demosthenes. In: PAPAIOANNOU, S.; SERAFIM, A.; DA VELA, B. The Theatre of Justice: Aspects of Performance in Greco-Roman Oratory and Rhetoric. Leiden and New York: Brill, 2017b. p. 26-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004341876_004
SERAFIM, A. “I, He, We, You, They”: Addresses to the Audience as a Means of Unity/Division in Attic Forensic Oratory. In: MICHALOPOULOS, A. et al. The Rhetoric of Unity and Division in Ancient Literature. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter, 2020a. p. 71-98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110611168-004
SERAFIM, A. Language and Persuasion in Attic Oratory: Imperatives and Questions. Argos: Journal of the Argentine Association of Classical Studies, v. 41, p. 1-19, 2020b.
SERAFIM, A. ΕΡΩΤΗΣΟΝ ΑΥΤΟΥΣ: Questions, Rhetorical Purpose, and Hypocrisis in Attic Forensic Oratory. In: THÜR, G.; AVRAMOVIC, S.; KATANCEVIIC, A. Law, Magic, and Oratory. Belgrade: Faculty of Law Publishing, 2020c. p. 229-248.
SERAFIM, A. Comic Invective in the Public Forensic Speeches of Attic Oratory. Hellenica, v. 68, n. 1, p. 23-42, 2020d.
SERAFIM, A. Religious Discourse in Attic Oratory and Politics. London and New York: Routledge, 2021a. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203703151
SERAFIM, A. The Questions in (Answering the Question about the Historicity of) Plato’s Apology of Socrates. In: MARKANTONATOS, A.; LIOTSAKIS, V.; SERAFIM, A. Witnesses and Evidence in Ancient Greek Literature. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter, 2021b. p. 135-153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110751970-008
SERAFIM, A. A Triangle in the Law-court: Speakers-Opponents-Audiences and the Use of the Imperative. Trends in Classics, v. 13, n. 2, p. 388-417, 2021c. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/tc-2021-0013
SPATHARAS, D. Persuasive ΓΕΛΩΣ: Public Speaking and the Use of Laughter. Mnemosyne, v. 59, n. 3, p. 374-387, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/156852506778132383
SPATHARAS, D. Projective Uses of Emotions, Out-groups, and Personal Characterization: The Case of Against Aristogeiton I (Dem. 25). In: MICHALOPOULOS, A. et al. The Rhetoric of Unity and Division in Ancient Literature. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter, 2021. p. 149-166. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110611168-007
STRYCKER, E. de; SLINGS, S. R. Plato’s Apology of Socrates: A Literary and Philosophical Study With a Running Commentary. Leiden, New York, and Cologne: E. J. Brill, 1994.
SÜSS, W. Ethos. Studien zur älteren griechischen Rhetorik. Leipzig and Berlin: Leipzig B.G. Teubner, 1920.
TAJFEL, H.; TURNER, J. C. An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict. In: AUSTIN, W. G.; WORCHEL, S. The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole, 1979. p. 33-37.
TAYLOR, A. E. Varia Socratica. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1911.
TAYLOR, C. The Politics of Recognition. In: TAYLOR, C. et al. Multiculturalism: Examining the Politics of Recognition. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994. p. 25–73.
TELL, H. Anytus and the Rhetoric of Abuse in Plato’s Apology and Meno. Classics@Journal, v. 11, 2013. <https://classics-at.chs.harvard.edu/classics11-hakan-tell-anytus-and-the-rhetoric-of-abuse-in-platos-apology-and-meno/>.
USHER, S. Greek Oratory: Tradition and Originality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198150749.001.0001
VASILIOU, I. Conditional Irony in the Socratic Dialogues. The Classical Quarterly, v. 49, n. 2, p. 456-472, 1999. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cq/49.2.456
VASILIOU, I. Socrates’ Reverse Irony. The Classical Quarterly, v. 52, n. 1, p. 220-230, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cq/52.1.220
VLASTOS, G. Socrates, Ironist and Moral Philosopher. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1991. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511518508
WALCOT, P. Envy and the Greeks: A Study of Human Behaviour. Warminster: Aris & Phillips, 1978.
WEINREICH, P. 1986. Identity Development in Migrant Offspring: Theory and Practice. In: EKSTRAND, L. H. Ethnic Minorities and Immigrants in a Cross-Cultural Perspective. Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets, 1986. p. 230-239.
WENDT, A. Anarchy is what States Make of It. International Organization, v. 46, n. 2, p. 391-426, 1992. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300027764
WEST, T. G. Plato’s Apology of Socrates. Ithaca/London: Cornell University Press, 1979.
WESTWOOD, G. The Orator and the Ghosts: Performing the Past in Fourth-Century Athens. In: PAPAIOANNOU, S.; SERAFIM, A.; DA VELA, B. The Theatre of Justice: Aspects of Performance in Greco-Roman Oratory and Rhetoric. Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2017. p. 57-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004341876_006
WILKINS, J. The Boastful Chef: The Discourse of Food in Ancient Greek Comedy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199240685.001.0001
WISSE, J. Ethos and Pathos from Aristotle to Cicero. Amsterdam: Adolf M. Hakkert, 1989.
WOLFSDORF, D. The Irony of Socrates. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, v. 65, n. 2, p. 175-187, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-594X.2007.00248.x
WORMAN, N. Abusive Mouths in Classical Athens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511482434
YUNIS, H. Taming Democracy: Models of Political Rhetoric in Classical Athens. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 1996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501711374
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2024 Andreas Serafim (Autor)
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
