Xenophon’s Subversive Socrates
A Reading of Memorabilia 4.1-4
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35699/1983-3636.2023.49042Palavras-chave:
justiça, piedade, Sócrates, teodiceia, XenofonteResumo
This article argues that Xenophon’s conception of Socrates’ exemplary qualities, by which he sought to exonerate him of the charges of impiety and harming the youth, was not that of the average Athenian. The difference was such that someone who was pious in the way Xenophon represented Socrates as being might even appear to be impious to the majority of his fellow citizens. So too, what Xenophon described as Socrates’ benefits to others might have seemed quite otherwise, when measured by popular views. The article thus challenges the still prevailing image of Xenophon as a man of mediocre intelligence, who perhaps misunderstood Socrates, but was incapable of creating a picture of him that was coherent and informed by an original, and perhaps even accurate, vision of his teachings.
Downloads
Referências
BRANCACCI, A. Le concezioni di socrate nei capitoli teologici dei memorabili. Elenchos, v. 29, n. 2, p. 233-252, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/elen-2008-290203
BROADIE, S.; SATTLER, B. Socrates the bully? Rudeness and cooperation in the Protagoras. In: VIRTUAL SOCRATES COLLOQUIUM. Lecture delivered on 31 March 2021 under the auspices of the International Society for Socratic Studies. A recording of the lecture is available at: <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q3JDHd9MDCQ>.
CHRIST, M. Xenophon and the Athenian Democracy: The Education of an Elite Citizenry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108862998
DANZIG, G. Xenophon’s Wicked Persian Or, What’s Wrong with Tissaphernes? Xenophon’s Views on Lying and Breaking Oaths. In: TUPLIN, C. J. (Org.). Persian responses: Political and Cultural Interaction with(in) the Achaemenid Empire. Swansea: Classical Press of Wales, 2007. p. 27-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvvnb3j.7
DANZIG, G. Apologizing for Socrates: How Plato and Xenophon Created our Socrates. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781978742987
JOHNSON, D. M. Xenophon’s Socratic Works. London: Routledge, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003036630
LACHANCE, G. Xenophon and the Elenchos: A Formal and Comparative Analysis. In: DANZIG, G.; JOHNSON, D.; MORRISON, D. (Org.). Plato and Xenophon: Comparative Studies. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 2018. p. 165-183. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004369085_009
LEBEDEV, A. The Authorship of the Derveni Papyrus, A Sophistic Treatise on the Origin of Religion and Language: A Case for Prodicus of Ceos. In: VASSALLO, C. (Org.). Presocratics and Papyrological Tradition: A Philosophical Reappraisal of the Sources. Proceedings of the International Workshop held at the University of Trier (22–24 September 2016). Berlin: De Gruyter, 2019. p. 491-606. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110666106-018
MOORE, C. Xenophon’s Socratic Education in Memorabilia Book 4. In: STAVRU, A.; MOORE, C. (Org.). Socrates and the Socratic Dialogue. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 2018. p. 500-520. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004341227_025
MORRISON, D. Xenophon’s Socrates on the Just and the Lawful. Ancient Philosophy, v. 15, n. 2, p. 329-347, 1995. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/ancientphil19951521
SEDLEY, D. Creationism and Its Critics in Antiquity. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2007. (Sather Classical Lectures, 66). Review by: BYDÉN, B. Bryn Mawr Classical Review, 16 May 2009.
SEDLEY, D. N. Creationism and Its Critics in Antiquity. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2008a. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/california/9780520253643.001.0001
SEDLEY, D. N. Socrates’ Place in the History of Teleology. Elenchos, v. 29, n. 2, p. 317-334, 2008b. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/elen-2008-290207
SEEL, G. If You Know What is Best, You Do It: Socratic Intellectualism in Xenophon and Plato. In: JUDSON, L.; KARASMANIS V. (Org.). Remembering Socrates: Philosophical Essays. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2006. p. 20-49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199276134.003.0003
VAN BERKEL, T. A. The Economics of Friendship: Conceptions of Reciprocity in Classical Greece, Leiden: E. J. Brill, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004416147
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2024 David Konstan (Autor)

Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.



