Epopeia e poesia bucólica no Idílio XI de Teócrito
Parole chiave:
Theocritus, Homer, Odyssey, bucolic poetry, Polyphemus, GalateaAbstract
Abstract: This paper discusses the relation between bucolic and epic poetry. Both genres shared the same meter – hexameter – and Theocritus was considered a poet influenced by Homer and belonging to epic tradition. In some sense it is possible to find bucolic elements in epic poetry, not only in similes in which there are shepherds in a variety of situations, but also in characters such as Polyphemus. Through the analysis of Polyphemus’ pastoral way of life in Odyssey a link is created between Theocritus’ idylls and Homeric narrative in order to distinguish bucolic poetry as a kind of epic poetry.
Downloads
Riferimenti bibliografici
ARNOTT, W. G. The overworked playwright. A study in Euripides’ “Cyclops”. G&R. Oxford, v. VIII, p. 164-169, 1961.
ARNOTT, W. G. Alexis. The fragments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1966.
BARIGAZZI, A. Una presunta aporia nel c. 11 di Teocrito. Hermes. Berlin, p. 179-188, 1975.
BROOKE, A. Theocritus’ idyll 11: a study in pastoral. Arethusa. Baltimore, v. CXCVII, p. 73-81, 1971.
BROWN, C. S. Odysseus and Polyphemus: the name and the curse. CL. Eugene, v. XVIII, p. 193-202, 1966.
CAIRNS, F. Theocritus’ first idyll: the literary programme. WS. Wien, v. XCVII, p. 89-113, 1984.
DOVER, K. J. Theocritus selected poems. London: Bristol Classical Press, 1992.
DUCHEMIN, J. Le Cyclope. Édition critique et commentée. Paris: Champion, 1945.
FANTUZZI, M.; HUNTER, R. Tradition and innovation in Hellenistic poetry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
FARRELL, J. Dialogue of genres in Ovid’s love song of Polyphemus. AJPh. Baltimore, v. CXIII, p. 235-268, 1992.
FORD, A. Epic as a genre. In: MORRIS, I.; POWELL, B. A new companion to Homer. Leiden/ New York/ Köln: Brill, 1997, p. 396-414.
FRIEDRICH, R. Heroic man and “polymetis”: Odysseus in the “Cyclopeia”. GRBS. Cambridge, v. XXVIII, p. 121-133, 1987.
GLENN, J. Virgil’s Polyphemus. G&R. Oxford, v. XIX, p. 47-59, 1972.
GOW, A. S. F. (Org.). Theocritus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1965.
GUTZWILLER, K. J. Theocritus’ pastoral analogies. Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press, 1991.
HASEGAWA, A. P. Os limites do gênero bucólico em Vergílio. 2004. Dissertação (Mestrado) Faculdade de Filosofia, Letras e Ciências Humanas da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2004.
HERNÁNDEZ, P. N. Back in the cave of the Cyclops. AJPh. Baltimore, v. CXXI, p. 345-366, 2001.
HOLTSMARK, E. B. Poetry as self-enlightenment: Theocritus 11. TAPhA. Baltimore, v. XCVII, p. 253-259, 1966.
HOMERO. Odisseia. Trad. de Carlos Alberto Nunes. Rio de Janeiro: Ediouro, 1970.
HORDERN, J. H. Cyclopea: Philoxenus, Theocritus, Callimachus, Bion. CQ. Oxford, p. 285-292, 2004.
HUNTER, R. Theocritus and the archaeology of Greek poetry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
HUNTER, R. Theocritus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
LAWALL, G. Theocritus’ Coan pastorals. Washington: The Center for Hellenic Studies, 1966.
PAGE, D. L. (Org.). Poetae melici Graeci. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1962.
PAYNE, M. Theocritus and the invention of fiction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
PFEIFFER, R. (Org.). Callimachus. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1953.
PICKARD-CAMBRIDGE, A. W. Dithyramb, tragedy and comedy. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1927.
ROSENMEYER, T. G. The green cabinet. Berkley/ Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1969.
SCHMEL, R. Structure and meaning in Theocritus 11. Mnemosyne. Leiden, v. XLV, p. 229-234, 1993.
SPOFFORD, E. W. Theocritus and Polyphemus. AJPh. Baltimore, p, 23-35, 1969.
USSHER, R. G. The “Cyclops” of Euripides. G&R. Cambridge, v. XVIII, p. 166-179, 1971.
WENDEL, C. (Org.). Scholia in Theocritum uetera. Stuttgart: Teubner, 1996.
