Outra Margem: revista de filosofia

Artigos

Vol. 5 No. 8 (2018): 1º e 2º Semestres de 2018

HEIDEGGER, KANT E O PROBLEMA DA LIBERDADE

Submitted
April 6, 2026
Published
2019-06-03

Abstract

In this paper I provide an analysis about the question of causal demarcation of freedom’s problem whose arises from Heidegger's interpretation of Kant's work. For that, it will be required an analysis of phenomenological interpretation of the feeling of respect aiming the right determination of agent's mode of being. Afterwards I drawn attention to phenomenological interpretation of Critique of Pure
Reason concept of Spontaneity in connection with that of freedom. This account will be important from a methodological point of view, preparing for the analysis of the relation between freedom and causality. As a result, from an ontological perspective, will be possible consider a concept of freedom other than that derived from the causal structure commonly associated with it.

References

  1. FIGAL, Günter. Martin Heidegger: Fenomenologia da Liberdade. Tradução de Marco Antônio Casanova. Rio de Janeiro: Forense Universitária, 2005.
  2. GOLOB, Sascha. Heidegger on Concepts, Freedom and Normativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.
  3. GUIGNON, Charles. Heidegger's concept of freedom: 1927-1930. In: DAHLSTROM, Daniel (org). Interpreting Heidegger: Critical Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011, pp. 79-106.
  4. HEIDEGGER, Martin Sein und Zeit, Tübingen: Niemeyer, 1957.
  5. ______. GA3: Kant und das Problem der Metaphysik. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1991.
  6. ______. GA24: Die Grundprobleme der Phänomenologie. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1989.
  7. ______. GA25: Phänomenologische Interpretation von Kants Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1977.
  8. ______. GA31: Vom Wesen der menschlichen Freiheit. Einleitung in die Philosophie. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1982.
  9. KANT, Immanuel. Crítica da Razão Pura, Tradução de Manuela Pinto dos Santos e Alexandre Fradique Morujão. Lisboa: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian, 2001.
  10. ______. Crítica da Razão Prática. Tradução de Valério Rohden. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2002.
  11. KELLY, Howard. Heidegger The Metaphysician: Modes of Being and Grundbegriffe: European Journal of Philosophy, 24(3), pp, 670-693, 2014.
  12. KORSGAARD, Christine. Morality as Freedom. In: In Creating the Kingdom of Ends. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986, pp.159-18.
  13. LYNE, Ian. Openness To Reality In McDowell and Heidegger: Normativity and Ontology. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology. Taylor & Francis, v. 31, n. 3, pp, 300-313, 2000.
  14. MCDANIEL, Kris. Ways of Being. In: Chalmers; Manley; Wasserman (orgs.). Metametaphysics: New Essays on foundations of the ontology. Oxford Oxford: University Press, pp. 290-319, 2009.
  15. MACFARLANE, John. Frege, Kant, and The Logic In Logicism. Philosophical Review, v. 111, pp, 25-65, 2002.
  16. MCMANNUS, Dennis. Ontological Pluralism and the Being and Time Project. Journal of History of Philosophy. 51(4): pp, 651-673, 2013.
  17. PIPPIN, Robert. Kant On The Spontaneity Of Mind. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, v. 17, n. 2, pp. 449- 476, 1987.
  18. RODRÍGUEZ, Ramon. Ser y tiempo de Martin Heidegger: Un comentario fenomenológico. Tecnos, 2015.
  19. ______. La interpretación Ontológica del Sentimiento moral. Studia Heideggeriana, v. IV. Teseo, 2015a.
  20. SPENCER, Joshua. Ways of Being. Philosophy Compass. 7 (12): pp, 910-918, 2012.
  21. TEPLEY, Joshua. Properties of Being in Heidegger's Being and Time. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 22 (3), pp. 461-481, 2014.
  22. VIGO, Alejandro. Arqueología y aleteiología, y otros estudios heideggerianos, Buenos Aires: Editorial Biblos, 2008.
  23. ______. Libertad como causa. Heidegger Kant y el Problema Metafísico de la Libertad. Studia Heideggeriana I. Teseo, 2011.
  24. WOOD. Allen. The Free Development of Each: Studies on Freedom, Right, and Ethics in Classical German Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.