Librarian's role in dentistry systematic reviews
an epidemiologic study
Palabras clave:
Librarians, Systematic reviews, DentistryResumen
Objective: Identify the librarian presence in dentistry systematic reviews. The primary outcome was the frequency and role of librarian presence. The secondary outcomes were to assess whether there are differences regarding impact factor, strategy availability, number of databases, and registration of protocol, in the systematic reviews that included or not a librarian. Methods: It were included systematic reviews in dentistry, in English, published in dental journals, indexed from July 1st, 2018 to July 1st, 2019 available on MEDLINE/PubMed. For statistical analysis, the T-test and Pearson's chi-squared test were used. The significance level was 5%. Results: Among 280 included studies 14% systematic reviews mention librarian participation, 9% as consultants and 5% as co-authors. There was no statistical difference for impact factor (p=0.928) outcomes, search strategy available (p=0.850), and number of database (p=0.240) among the studies that had or not the presence of the librarian. The number of systematic reviews registered was higher when the librarian was present. The databases mentioned more frequently were MEDLINE, Cochrane, and Embase. Conclusion: The frequency of librarian participation in the included systematic reviews was 14%. The most frequent participation was as consultants. Systematic reviews with a librarian on the team were associated with more protocol registration.
Descargas
Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.
Citas
BADER, James; ISMAIL, Amid. Survey of systematic reviews in dentistry. The Journal of the American Dental Association, [S. l.], v. 135, n. 4, p. 464–473, 2004. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2004.0212
BASSANI, Rafaela et al. Systematic reviews in dentistry: current status, epidemiological and reporting characteristics. Journal of Dentistry, [S. l.], v. 82, n. December 2018, p. 71–84, 2019. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2019.01.014
BETHEL, Alison; ROGERS, Morwenna. A checklist to assess database-hosting platforms for designing and running searches for systematic reviews. Health Information and Libraries Journal, [S. l.], v. 31, n. 1, p. 43–53, 2014. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1111/hir.12054
BEVERLEY, C. A.; BOOTH, A.; BATH, P. A. The role of the information specialist in the systematic review process: a health information case study. Health information and libraries journal, [S. l.], v. 20, n. 2, p. 65–74, 2003. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1471-1842.2003.00411.x
BOOTH, Alison et al. An international registry of systematic-review protocols. The Lancet, [S. l.], v. 377, n. 9760, p. 108–109, 2011. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60903-8
BOOTH, Alison et al. The nuts and bolts of PROSPERO: an international prospective register of systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews, [S. l.], v. 1, n. 1, p. 2, 2012. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-1-2
BORREGO, Ángel; ARDANUY, Jordi; URBANO, Cristóbal. Librarians as research partners: their contribution to the scholarly endeavour beyond library and information science. Journal of Academic Librarianship, [S. l.], v. 44, n. 5, p. 663–670, 2018. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2018.07.012
BULLERS, Krystal et al. It takes longer than you think: librarian time spent on systematic review tasks. Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA, [S. l.], v. 106, n. 2, p. 198–207, 2018. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2018.323
DESMEULES, Robin; CAMPBELL, Sandy; DORGAN, Marlene. Acknowledging librarians’ contributions to systematic review searching. Journal of the Canadian Health Libraries Association / Journal de l’Association des bibliothèques de la santé du Canada, [S. l.], v. 37, n. 2, p. 44–52, 2016. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.5596/c16-014
DONATO, Helena; DONATO, Mariana. Etapas na condução de uma revisão sistemática. Acta Médica Portuguesa, [S. l.], v. 32, n. 3, p. 227, 2019. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.20344/amp.11923
DUDDEN, Rosalind F.; PROTZKO, Shandra L. The systematic review team: contributions of the health sciences librarian. Medical Reference Services Quarterly, [S. l.], v. 30, n. 3, p. 301–315, 2011. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1080/02763869.2011.590425
FERREIRA, Daniele Masterson Tavares Pereira. Avaliação das estratégias de busca nas revisões sistemáticas da área de Odontologia. 2017. - Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, [s. l.], 2017. Disponível em: http://www.unirio.br/ppgb/arquivo/daniele-masterson
FOUTCH, Leslie J. A new partner in the process: the role of a librarian on a faculty research team. Collaborative Librarianship, [S. l.], v. 8, n. 82, p. 80–83, 2016. Disponível em: https://digitalcommons.du.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1045&context=collaborativelibrarianship
FRANCO, Juan Víctor Ariel et al. Identification of problems in search strategies in Cochrane Reviews. Research Synthesis Methods, [S. l.], v. 9, n. 3, p. 408–416, 2018. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1302
GOLDER, Su; LOKE, Yoon; MCINTOSH, Heather M. Poor reporting and inadequate searches were apparent in systematic reviews of adverse effects. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, [S. l.], v. 61, n. 5, p. 440–448, 2008. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.06.005
GORE, Genevieve C.; JONES, Julie. Systematic reviews and librarians: a primer for managers. Partnership: The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research, [S. l.], v. 10, n. 1, p. 1–17, 2015. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.21083/partnership.v10i1.3343
HIGGINS, JPT et al. (org.). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. version 6 ed. [S. l.]: Cochrane, 2019. E-book. Disponível em: www.training.cochrane.org/handbook
INSTITUTE OF MEDICINE. Finding what works in health care. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, 2011. E-book. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.17226/13059
INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE OF MEDICAL JOURNAL EDITORS (ICJME). Defining the role of authors and contributors. [s. l.], [2020]. Disponível em: http://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/roles-and-responsibilities/defining-the-role-of-authors-and-contributors.html#two. Acesso em: 15 jan. 2020.
KOFFEL, Jonathan B. Use of recommended search strategies in systematic reviews and the impact of librarian involvement: a cross-sectional survey of recent authors. PLOS ONE, [S. l.], v. 10, n. 5, p. e0125931, 2015. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125931
LACKEY, Mellanye J.; GREENBERG, Heidi; RETHLEFSEN, Melissa L. Building the systematic review core in an academic health sciences library. Journal of the Medical Library Association, [S. l.], v. 107, n. 4, p. 558–594, 2019. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2019.711
MCGOWAN, Jessie et al. PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, [S. l.], v. 75, p. 40–46, 2016. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.01.021
MCGOWAN, Jessie; SAMPSON, Margaret. Systematic reviews need systematic searchers. Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA, [S. l.], v. 93, n. 1, p. 74–80, 2005. Disponível em: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC545125/
MCKEOWN, Sandra; ROSS-WHITE, Amanda. Building capacity for librarian support and addressing collaboration challenges by formalizing library systematic review services. Journal of the Medical Library Association, [S. l.], v. 107, n. 3, p. 411–419, 2019. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2019.443
MEDICAL LIBRARY ASSOCIATION. Role of expert searching in health sciences libraries. Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA, [S. l.], v. 93, n. 1, p. 42–44, 2005. Disponível em: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15685273
MEERT, Deborah; TORABI, Nazi; COSTELLA, John. Impact of librarians on reporting of the literature searching component of pediatric systematic reviews. Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA, [S. l.], v. 104, n. 4, p. 267–277, 2016. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.104.4.004
MOHER, David et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. International Journal of Surgery, [S. l.], v. 8, n. 5, p. 336–341, 2010. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007
OUZZANI, Mourad et al. Rayyan: a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews, [S. l.], v. 5, n. 1, p. 210, 2016. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4. Acesso em: 22 jan. 2020.
RETHLEFSEN, Melissa L. et al. Librarian co-authors correlated with higher quality reported search strategies in general internal medicine systematic reviews. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, [S. l.], v. 68, n. 6, p. 617–626, 2015. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.11.025
SIDERI, Sofia; PAPAGEORGIOU, Spyridon N.; ELIADES, Theodore. Registration in the international prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) of systematic review protocols was associated with increased review quality. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, [S. l.], v. 100, p. 103–110, 2018. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.01.003
SPENCER, Angela J.; ELDREDGE, Jonathan D. Roles for librarians in systematic reviews: a scoping review. Journal of the Medical Library Association, [S. l.], v. 106, n. 1, p. 46–56, 2018. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.5195/JMLA.2018.82
SWINKELS, Annette; BRIDDON, Jason; HALL, Jane. Two physiotherapists, one librarian and a systematic literature review: collaboration in action. Health Information and Libraries Journal, England, v. 23, n. 4, p. 248–256, 2006. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2006.00689.x
TOEWS, Lorraine. Benchmarking veterinary librarians’ participation in systematic reviews and scoping reviews. Journal of the Medical Library Association, [S. l.], v. 107, n. 4, p. 499–507, 2019. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2019.710
BASSANI, Rafaela et al. Systematic reviews in dentistry: current status, epidemiological and reporting characteristics. Journal of Dentistry, [S. l.], v. 82, n. December 2018, p. 71–84, 2019. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2019.01.014
BETHEL, Alison; ROGERS, Morwenna. A checklist to assess database-hosting platforms for designing and running searches for systematic reviews. Health Information and Libraries Journal, [S. l.], v. 31, n. 1, p. 43–53, 2014. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1111/hir.12054
BEVERLEY, C. A.; BOOTH, A.; BATH, P. A. The role of the information specialist in the systematic review process: a health information case study. Health information and libraries journal, [S. l.], v. 20, n. 2, p. 65–74, 2003. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1471-1842.2003.00411.x
BOOTH, Alison et al. An international registry of systematic-review protocols. The Lancet, [S. l.], v. 377, n. 9760, p. 108–109, 2011. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60903-8
BOOTH, Alison et al. The nuts and bolts of PROSPERO: an international prospective register of systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews, [S. l.], v. 1, n. 1, p. 2, 2012. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-1-2
BORREGO, Ángel; ARDANUY, Jordi; URBANO, Cristóbal. Librarians as research partners: their contribution to the scholarly endeavour beyond library and information science. Journal of Academic Librarianship, [S. l.], v. 44, n. 5, p. 663–670, 2018. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2018.07.012
BULLERS, Krystal et al. It takes longer than you think: librarian time spent on systematic review tasks. Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA, [S. l.], v. 106, n. 2, p. 198–207, 2018. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2018.323
DESMEULES, Robin; CAMPBELL, Sandy; DORGAN, Marlene. Acknowledging librarians’ contributions to systematic review searching. Journal of the Canadian Health Libraries Association / Journal de l’Association des bibliothèques de la santé du Canada, [S. l.], v. 37, n. 2, p. 44–52, 2016. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.5596/c16-014
DONATO, Helena; DONATO, Mariana. Etapas na condução de uma revisão sistemática. Acta Médica Portuguesa, [S. l.], v. 32, n. 3, p. 227, 2019. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.20344/amp.11923
DUDDEN, Rosalind F.; PROTZKO, Shandra L. The systematic review team: contributions of the health sciences librarian. Medical Reference Services Quarterly, [S. l.], v. 30, n. 3, p. 301–315, 2011. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1080/02763869.2011.590425
FERREIRA, Daniele Masterson Tavares Pereira. Avaliação das estratégias de busca nas revisões sistemáticas da área de Odontologia. 2017. - Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, [s. l.], 2017. Disponível em: http://www.unirio.br/ppgb/arquivo/daniele-masterson
FOUTCH, Leslie J. A new partner in the process: the role of a librarian on a faculty research team. Collaborative Librarianship, [S. l.], v. 8, n. 82, p. 80–83, 2016. Disponível em: https://digitalcommons.du.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1045&context=collaborativelibrarianship
FRANCO, Juan Víctor Ariel et al. Identification of problems in search strategies in Cochrane Reviews. Research Synthesis Methods, [S. l.], v. 9, n. 3, p. 408–416, 2018. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1302
GOLDER, Su; LOKE, Yoon; MCINTOSH, Heather M. Poor reporting and inadequate searches were apparent in systematic reviews of adverse effects. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, [S. l.], v. 61, n. 5, p. 440–448, 2008. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.06.005
GORE, Genevieve C.; JONES, Julie. Systematic reviews and librarians: a primer for managers. Partnership: The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research, [S. l.], v. 10, n. 1, p. 1–17, 2015. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.21083/partnership.v10i1.3343
HIGGINS, JPT et al. (org.). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. version 6 ed. [S. l.]: Cochrane, 2019. E-book. Disponível em: www.training.cochrane.org/handbook
INSTITUTE OF MEDICINE. Finding what works in health care. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, 2011. E-book. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.17226/13059
INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE OF MEDICAL JOURNAL EDITORS (ICJME). Defining the role of authors and contributors. [s. l.], [2020]. Disponível em: http://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/roles-and-responsibilities/defining-the-role-of-authors-and-contributors.html#two. Acesso em: 15 jan. 2020.
KOFFEL, Jonathan B. Use of recommended search strategies in systematic reviews and the impact of librarian involvement: a cross-sectional survey of recent authors. PLOS ONE, [S. l.], v. 10, n. 5, p. e0125931, 2015. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125931
LACKEY, Mellanye J.; GREENBERG, Heidi; RETHLEFSEN, Melissa L. Building the systematic review core in an academic health sciences library. Journal of the Medical Library Association, [S. l.], v. 107, n. 4, p. 558–594, 2019. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2019.711
MCGOWAN, Jessie et al. PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, [S. l.], v. 75, p. 40–46, 2016. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.01.021
MCGOWAN, Jessie; SAMPSON, Margaret. Systematic reviews need systematic searchers. Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA, [S. l.], v. 93, n. 1, p. 74–80, 2005. Disponível em: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC545125/
MCKEOWN, Sandra; ROSS-WHITE, Amanda. Building capacity for librarian support and addressing collaboration challenges by formalizing library systematic review services. Journal of the Medical Library Association, [S. l.], v. 107, n. 3, p. 411–419, 2019. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2019.443
MEDICAL LIBRARY ASSOCIATION. Role of expert searching in health sciences libraries. Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA, [S. l.], v. 93, n. 1, p. 42–44, 2005. Disponível em: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15685273
MEERT, Deborah; TORABI, Nazi; COSTELLA, John. Impact of librarians on reporting of the literature searching component of pediatric systematic reviews. Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA, [S. l.], v. 104, n. 4, p. 267–277, 2016. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.104.4.004
MOHER, David et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. International Journal of Surgery, [S. l.], v. 8, n. 5, p. 336–341, 2010. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007
OUZZANI, Mourad et al. Rayyan: a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews, [S. l.], v. 5, n. 1, p. 210, 2016. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4. Acesso em: 22 jan. 2020.
RETHLEFSEN, Melissa L. et al. Librarian co-authors correlated with higher quality reported search strategies in general internal medicine systematic reviews. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, [S. l.], v. 68, n. 6, p. 617–626, 2015. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.11.025
SIDERI, Sofia; PAPAGEORGIOU, Spyridon N.; ELIADES, Theodore. Registration in the international prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) of systematic review protocols was associated with increased review quality. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, [S. l.], v. 100, p. 103–110, 2018. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.01.003
SPENCER, Angela J.; ELDREDGE, Jonathan D. Roles for librarians in systematic reviews: a scoping review. Journal of the Medical Library Association, [S. l.], v. 106, n. 1, p. 46–56, 2018. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.5195/JMLA.2018.82
SWINKELS, Annette; BRIDDON, Jason; HALL, Jane. Two physiotherapists, one librarian and a systematic literature review: collaboration in action. Health Information and Libraries Journal, England, v. 23, n. 4, p. 248–256, 2006. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2006.00689.x
TOEWS, Lorraine. Benchmarking veterinary librarians’ participation in systematic reviews and scoping reviews. Journal of the Medical Library Association, [S. l.], v. 107, n. 4, p. 499–507, 2019. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2019.710
Descargas
Publicado
2023-08-25
Cómo citar
Lehmkuhl, K., Silveira , C. Z., Pauletto, P., Monteguti Savi, M. G., Porporatti, A. L., & De Luca Canto, G. (2023). Librarian’s role in dentistry systematic reviews: an epidemiologic study. Perspectivas Em Ciência Da Informação, 28(Fluxo Contínuo), e25776. Recuperado a partir de https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/pci/article/view/25776
Número
Sección
Artículos
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2023 Karyn Lehmkuhl, Crislaine Zurilda Silveira, Patrícia Pauletto, Maria Gorete Monteguti Savi, André Luís Porporatti, Graziela De Luca Canto
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
