Características metadiscursivas na engenharia aeronáutica e aeroespacial

o uso de marcadores interativos e interacionais

Autori

Parole chiave:

metadiscurso, marcadores interativos, marcadores interacionais, aeronáutica, Engenharia aeroespacial

Abstract

Estudos sobre o metadiscurso concentram-se em como os gêneros delineiam nuances das características linguísticas que residem em várias estruturas, dependendo das exigências linguísticas da linguagem para fins específicos. Para entender como essas nuances se manifestam a partir de um repertório de características metadiscursivas em um discurso altamente contextualizado, este artigo explora como os recursos metadiscursivos são utilizados na engenharia aeronáutica e aeroespacial, e como estes facilitam a escrita de um texto na área da aviação. Por meio dos pressupostos analíticos de recursos interativos e interacionais de Hyland e Tse (2004) e Hyland (2005, 2010), este estudo examina um corpus com um total de 125.298 palavras, composto de trinta artigos de pesquisa publicados no Journal of Aeronautics and Aerospace Engineering. O estudo mostra que os marcadores metadiscursivos assemelham-se aos de Hyland e Tse (2004) e Hyland (2005, 2010) em relação aos marcadores interativos e interacionais, que contêm características semelhantes à escrita acadêmica, tais como formalidade e objetividade. Entretanto, no uso de recursos interacionais percebe-se informalidade por meio do uso de auto menções. A análise quantitativa ressalta uma frequência maior de marcadores interativos do que marcadores interacionais nos trinta artigos. Dessa forma, conclui-se que os autores de artigos de engenharia aeronáutica e aeroespacial empregam essencialmente mais recursos interativos do que recursos interacionais, o que pode sugerir que tenham uma preocupação em tornar o texto mais coeso, ao mesmo tempo em que se responsabilizam ​​por estabelecer uma postura interpessoal em relação aos conteúdos proposicionais e ao público do texto. Os resultados deste estudo apresentam implicações pedagógicas sobre como escritores da área de engenharia aeronáutica e aeroespacial podem efetivamente escrever seus artigos por meio do uso estratégico de marcadores metadiscursivos. 

Downloads

La data di download non è ancora disponibile.

Riferimenti bibliografici

ADEL, A. Metadiscourse in L1 and L2 English. Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2006.

ALYOUSEF, H. S. An Investigation of Metadiscourse Features in International Postgraduate Business Students’ Texts: The Use of Interactive and Interactional Markers in Tertiary Multimodal Finance Texts. SAGE Journals, v. 5, n. 4, p. 1-10, 2015.

AULL, L. L.; LANCASTER, Z. Linguistic Markers of Stance in Early and Advanced Academic Writing: A Corpus-based Comparison. Written Communication, v. 31, n. 2, p. 151-183, 2014.

BAL-GEZEGIN, B. A Corpus-Based Investigation of Metadiscourse in Academic Book Reviews. Procedia – Social and Behavioural Sciences, v. 232, p. 713-718, 2016.

BREIVEGA, K. R.; DAHL, T.; FLOTTUM, K. Traces of Self and Others in Research Articles: A Comparative Study Pilot Study of English, French and Norwegian Research Articles in Medicine, Economics and Linguistics. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, v. 12, n. 2, p. 218-239, 2002.

BUNTON, D. The Use of Higher Level Metatext in PhD Theses. English for Specific Purposes, v. 18, p. 41-56, 1999.

DHAL, T. Textual Metadiscourse in Research Articles: A Marker of National Culture or of Academic Discipline? Journal of Pragmatics, v. 36, n. 10, p. 1807-1825, 2004.

DIAA, A. M.; EL-DOSOKY, M. F.; AHMED, M. A. Enhancing the Performance of an Axial Compressor Cascade Using Vortex Generators. Journal of Aeronautics & Aerospace Engineering, v. 5, n. 4, p. 1-9, 2016.

EL-ZAHABY, A. M.; HAMED, M. H.; OMARA, Z. M.; ELDESOUKEY, A. M. Study of the Configuration and Performance of Air-Air Ejectors Based on CFD Simulation. Journal of Aeronautics & Aerospace Engineering, v. 6, n. 4, p. 1-9, 2017.

FU, X. The Use of Interactional Metadiscourse in Job Postings. Discourse Studies, v. 14, n. 4, p. 399-417, 2012.

GRABE, W. Constrastive Rhetoric and Text Type Research. In: CONNOR, U.; KAPLAN, R. B. (ed.). Writing Across Languages: Analysis of L2 Text Reading. MA: Addison-Wesley, 1987. p. 115-138.

HYLAND, K. Applying a Gloss: Exemplifying and Reformulating in Academic Discourse. Applied Linguistics, v. 28, p. 266-285, 2007.

HYLAND, K. Boosting, Hedging and the Negotiation of Academic Knowledge. Text, v. 18, n. 3, p. 349-382, 1998.

HYLAND, K. Disciplinary Identities: Individuality and Community in Academic Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.

HYLAND, K. Hedging in Academic Writing and EAP Textbooks. English for Specific Purposes, v. 13, p. 239-256, 1994.

HYLAND, K. Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing. London: Continuum, 2005. 241p.

HYLAND, K. Metadiscourse: Mapping Interactions in Academic Writing. Nordic Journal of English Studies, v. 9, n. 2, p. 125-143, 2010.

HYLAND, K. Nurturing Hedges in the ESP Curriculum. System, v. 24, p. 477-490, 1996a.

HYLAND, K. What do They Mean? Questions in Academic Writing. Text, v. 22, p. 529-557, 2002.

HYLAND, K. Writing Without Conviction? Hedging in Science Research Articles. Applied Linguistics, v. 17, p. 433-454, 1996b.

HYLAND, K.; JIANG, F. Change of Attitude? A Diachronic Study of Stance. Written Communication, v. 33, n. 3, p. 251-274, 2016.

HYLAND, K.; TSE, P. Metadiscourse in Academic Writing: A Reappraisal. Applied Linguistics, v. 25, n. 2, p. 156-177, 2004.

KAWASE, T. Metadiscourse in the Introductions of PhD Theses and Research Articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, v. 20, p. 114-124, 2015.

KHEDRI, M.; HENG, C. S.; EBRAHIMI, S. F. An Exploration of Interactive Metadiscourse Markers in Academic Research Article Abstracts in Two Disciplines. Discourse Studies, v. 15, n. 3, p. 1-13, 2013.

KHUNTIA, S. K.; AHUJA, A. S. Optimal Design and CFD Analysis of Wing of a Small-Scale UAV to Obtain Maximum Efficiency. Journal of Aeronautics & Aerospace Engineering, v. 7, n. 1, p. 1-7, 2018.

KIM, L. C.; LIM, M. H. Metadiscourse in English and Chinese Research Article Introductions. Discourse Studies, v. 15, n. 2, p. 129-146, 2013.

KUHI, D.; BEHNAM, B. Generic Variations and Metadiscourse Use in the Writing of Applied Linguists: A Comparative Study and Preliminary Framework. Written Communication, v. 28, n. 1, p. 97-141, 2011.

KUHI, D.; BEHNAM, B. Metadiscourse in Newspaper Genre: A Cross-Linguistic Study of English and Persian Editorials. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, v. 19, p. 1046-1055, 2014.

KUHI, D.; MOUSAVI, Z. A Diachronic Study of Interpersonality in Research Articles’ Discussion Section: The Field of Applied Linguistics. International Journal of Research in Humanities and Social Studies, v. 2, n. 4, p. 6-13, 2015.

LAFUENTE-MILLÁN, E. Reader Engagement Across Cultures, Languages and Contexts of Publication in Business Research Articles. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, v. 24, n. 2, p. 201-223, 2014.

LANDELL-MILLS, N. Calculation of the Air Displaced by a Wing. Journal of Aeronautics & Aerospace Engineering, v. 6, n. 4, p. 1-9, 2017.

LEE, J. J.; CASAL, J. E. Metadiscourse in Results and Discussion Chapters: A Cross-Linguistic Analysis of English and Spanish Thesis Writers in Engineering. System, v. 46, p. 39-54, 2014.

MANSOURI, S.; NAJAFABADI, M. M.; BOROUJENI, S. S. Metadiscourse in Research Article Abstracts: A Cross Lingual and Disciplinary Investigation. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, v. 3, n. 4, p. 296-307, 2016.

MARCELLINO, W. M. Talk Like a Marine: USMC Linguistic Acculturation and Civil-Military Argument. Discourse Studies, v. 16, n. 3, p. 1-21, 2014.

MAURANEN, A. Contrastive ESP Rhetoric: Metatext in Finnish-English Economic Texts. English for Specific Purposes, v. 12, p. 3-22, 1993.

MCENRY, T.; KIFLE, N. A. Epistemic Modality in Argumentative Essays of Second Language Writers. In: FLOWERDEW, J. (ed.). Academic Discourse. London: Longman, 2002. p. 182-195.

MCGANNON, K. Critical Discourse Analysis in Sport and Exercise: What, Why and How. In: SMITH, B.; SPARKES, A. E. (ed.). Routledge International Handbook of Qualitative Research in Sport and Exercise. London: Routledge, 2016. p. 230-242.

MINA, K. G.; BIRIA, R. Exploring Interactive and Interactional Metadiscourse Markers in Discussion Sections of Social and Medical Science Articles. International Journal of Research in English Education, v. 2, n. 4, p. 11-29, 2017.

MOCANU, M. An Empirical Analysis of Metadiscourse in the Abstracts of Romanian Accounting Research Articles. Accounting and Management Information Systems, v. 14, n. 2, p. 362-377, 2015.

MOJICA, L. Filipino Author’s Ways of Showing Detachment/Commitment in Their English Academic Papers. In: DAYAG, D.; QUAKENBUSH, J. S. (ed.). Linguistics and Language Education in the Philippines and Beyond: A Festschrift in Honour of Ma. Lourdes S. Bautista. Manila: Linguistic Society of the Philippines, 2005. p. 511-525.

MOZAYAN, M. R.; ALLAMI, H.; FAZILATFAR, A. M. Metadiscourse Features in Medical Research Articles: Subdisciplinary and Paradigmatic Influences in English and Persian Practice. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, v. 9, n. 1, p. 83-104, 2018.

MUR-DUEÑAS, P.; ŠINKŪNIENĖ, J. Self-Reference in Research Articles Across Europe and Asia: A Review of Studies. Brno Studies in English, v. 4, n. 1, p. 71-92, 2016.

PALTRIDGE, B. Genre, Text Type, and the Language Learning Classroom. ELT Journal, v. 50, n. 3, p. 237-243, 1996.

SEOANE, E.; HUNDT, M. Voice Alternation and Authorial Presence: Variation Across Disciplinary Areas in Academic English. Journal of English Linguistics, v. 46, n. 1, p. 3-22, 2018.

SCHNEIDER, M. Failure Aeroacoustic’s Investigation on High-Lift Device by Using a Modern Hybrid RANS/LES-Model. Journal of Aeronautics & Aerospace Engineering, v. 6, n. 3, p. 1-15, 2017.

SWALES, J. Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Setting. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.

THUEVOLD, E. Epistemic Modality Markers in Research Articles: A Crosslinguistic and Cross-Disciplinary Study. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, v. 16, n. 1, p. 61-87, 2006.

WAN, T.; LIU, C. M. Drag Reduction Optimization for Hypersonic Blunt Body With Aerospikes. Journal of Aeronautics & Aerospace Engineering, v. 6, n. 4, p. 1-8, 2017.

ZHANG, M. A Multidimensional Analysis of Metadiscourse Markers Across Written Registers. Discourse Studies, v. 18, n. 2, p. 204-222, 2016.

Pubblicato

2024-11-29