Metadiscourse Features in Aeronautics and Aerospace Engineering

The Use of Interactive and Interactional Markers

Authors

Keywords:

metadiscourse, interactive markers, interactional markers, aeronautics, aerospace engineering

Abstract

Several studies on metadiscourse zero in on how genres show nuances of linguistic features that reside in various structures depending upon the linguistic exigencies of language for specific purposes. Inquisitive on how these nuances are demonstrated through a repertoire of metadiscoursal features in a highly contextualized discourse, this paper explores how metadiscourse resources are utilized in aeronautics and aerospace engineering and how these facilitate the development of a well-composed text in the field of aviation. Using Hyland and Tse’s (2004) and Hyland’s ( 2005, 2010) analytical frameworks for interactive and interactional resources, a corpus of thirty research articles comprising 125,298 words published in the Journal of Aeronautics and Aerospace Engineering was scrutinized. As revealed in the study, the investigated metadiscourse markers resembled Hyland and Tse’s (2004) and Hyland’s (2005, 2010) findings in terms of interactive and interactional markers, which contain similar features of academic writing such as formality and objectivity; however, in the use of interactional resources, it yielded a finding that supports informality through the use of self-mentions. The quantitative analysis yielded a higher frequency of interactive markers than interactional markers across the thirty articles. This argues that writers in aeronautics and aerospace engineering articles essentially employ more interactive resources than interactional resources, suggesting that these writers are primarily concerned with making their text more cohesive while being responsible for establishing an interpersonal stance toward both the propositional contents and the audience of the text. The findings of the present study provide pedagogical implications as to how writers in the field of aeronautics and aerospace engineering can effectively compose their articles through the strategic use of metadiscoursal markers. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ADEL, A. Metadiscourse in L1 and L2 English. Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2006.

ALYOUSEF, H. S. An Investigation of Metadiscourse Features in International Postgraduate Business Students’ Texts: The Use of Interactive and Interactional Markers in Tertiary Multimodal Finance Texts. SAGE Journals, v. 5, n. 4, p. 1-10, 2015.

AULL, L. L.; LANCASTER, Z. Linguistic Markers of Stance in Early and Advanced Academic Writing: A Corpus-based Comparison. Written Communication, v. 31, n. 2, p. 151-183, 2014.

BAL-GEZEGIN, B. A Corpus-Based Investigation of Metadiscourse in Academic Book Reviews. Procedia – Social and Behavioural Sciences, v. 232, p. 713-718, 2016.

BREIVEGA, K. R.; DAHL, T.; FLOTTUM, K. Traces of Self and Others in Research Articles: A Comparative Study Pilot Study of English, French and Norwegian Research Articles in Medicine, Economics and Linguistics. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, v. 12, n. 2, p. 218-239, 2002.

BUNTON, D. The Use of Higher Level Metatext in PhD Theses. English for Specific Purposes, v. 18, p. 41-56, 1999.

DHAL, T. Textual Metadiscourse in Research Articles: A Marker of National Culture or of Academic Discipline? Journal of Pragmatics, v. 36, n. 10, p. 1807-1825, 2004.

DIAA, A. M.; EL-DOSOKY, M. F.; AHMED, M. A. Enhancing the Performance of an Axial Compressor Cascade Using Vortex Generators. Journal of Aeronautics & Aerospace Engineering, v. 5, n. 4, p. 1-9, 2016.

EL-ZAHABY, A. M.; HAMED, M. H.; OMARA, Z. M.; ELDESOUKEY, A. M. Study of the Configuration and Performance of Air-Air Ejectors Based on CFD Simulation. Journal of Aeronautics & Aerospace Engineering, v. 6, n. 4, p. 1-9, 2017.

FU, X. The Use of Interactional Metadiscourse in Job Postings. Discourse Studies, v. 14, n. 4, p. 399-417, 2012.

GRABE, W. Constrastive Rhetoric and Text Type Research. In: CONNOR, U.; KAPLAN, R. B. (ed.). Writing Across Languages: Analysis of L2 Text Reading. MA: Addison-Wesley, 1987. p. 115-138.

HYLAND, K. Applying a Gloss: Exemplifying and Reformulating in Academic Discourse. Applied Linguistics, v. 28, p. 266-285, 2007.

HYLAND, K. Boosting, Hedging and the Negotiation of Academic Knowledge. Text, v. 18, n. 3, p. 349-382, 1998.

HYLAND, K. Disciplinary Identities: Individuality and Community in Academic Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.

HYLAND, K. Hedging in Academic Writing and EAP Textbooks. English for Specific Purposes, v. 13, p. 239-256, 1994.

HYLAND, K. Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing. London: Continuum, 2005. 241p.

HYLAND, K. Metadiscourse: Mapping Interactions in Academic Writing. Nordic Journal of English Studies, v. 9, n. 2, p. 125-143, 2010.

HYLAND, K. Nurturing Hedges in the ESP Curriculum. System, v. 24, p. 477-490, 1996a.

HYLAND, K. What do They Mean? Questions in Academic Writing. Text, v. 22, p. 529-557, 2002.

HYLAND, K. Writing Without Conviction? Hedging in Science Research Articles. Applied Linguistics, v. 17, p. 433-454, 1996b.

HYLAND, K.; JIANG, F. Change of Attitude? A Diachronic Study of Stance. Written Communication, v. 33, n. 3, p. 251-274, 2016.

HYLAND, K.; TSE, P. Metadiscourse in Academic Writing: A Reappraisal. Applied Linguistics, v. 25, n. 2, p. 156-177, 2004.

KAWASE, T. Metadiscourse in the Introductions of PhD Theses and Research Articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, v. 20, p. 114-124, 2015.

KHEDRI, M.; HENG, C. S.; EBRAHIMI, S. F. An Exploration of Interactive Metadiscourse Markers in Academic Research Article Abstracts in Two Disciplines. Discourse Studies, v. 15, n. 3, p. 1-13, 2013.

KHUNTIA, S. K.; AHUJA, A. S. Optimal Design and CFD Analysis of Wing of a Small-Scale UAV to Obtain Maximum Efficiency. Journal of Aeronautics & Aerospace Engineering, v. 7, n. 1, p. 1-7, 2018.

KIM, L. C.; LIM, M. H. Metadiscourse in English and Chinese Research Article Introductions. Discourse Studies, v. 15, n. 2, p. 129-146, 2013.

KUHI, D.; BEHNAM, B. Generic Variations and Metadiscourse Use in the Writing of Applied Linguists: A Comparative Study and Preliminary Framework. Written Communication, v. 28, n. 1, p. 97-141, 2011.

KUHI, D.; BEHNAM, B. Metadiscourse in Newspaper Genre: A Cross-Linguistic Study of English and Persian Editorials. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, v. 19, p. 1046-1055, 2014.

KUHI, D.; MOUSAVI, Z. A Diachronic Study of Interpersonality in Research Articles’ Discussion Section: The Field of Applied Linguistics. International Journal of Research in Humanities and Social Studies, v. 2, n. 4, p. 6-13, 2015.

LAFUENTE-MILLÁN, E. Reader Engagement Across Cultures, Languages and Contexts of Publication in Business Research Articles. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, v. 24, n. 2, p. 201-223, 2014.

LANDELL-MILLS, N. Calculation of the Air Displaced by a Wing. Journal of Aeronautics & Aerospace Engineering, v. 6, n. 4, p. 1-9, 2017.

LEE, J. J.; CASAL, J. E. Metadiscourse in Results and Discussion Chapters: A Cross-Linguistic Analysis of English and Spanish Thesis Writers in Engineering. System, v. 46, p. 39-54, 2014.

MANSOURI, S.; NAJAFABADI, M. M.; BOROUJENI, S. S. Metadiscourse in Research Article Abstracts: A Cross Lingual and Disciplinary Investigation. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, v. 3, n. 4, p. 296-307, 2016.

MARCELLINO, W. M. Talk Like a Marine: USMC Linguistic Acculturation and Civil-Military Argument. Discourse Studies, v. 16, n. 3, p. 1-21, 2014.

MAURANEN, A. Contrastive ESP Rhetoric: Metatext in Finnish-English Economic Texts. English for Specific Purposes, v. 12, p. 3-22, 1993.

MCENRY, T.; KIFLE, N. A. Epistemic Modality in Argumentative Essays of Second Language Writers. In: FLOWERDEW, J. (ed.). Academic Discourse. London: Longman, 2002. p. 182-195.

MCGANNON, K. Critical Discourse Analysis in Sport and Exercise: What, Why and How. In: SMITH, B.; SPARKES, A. E. (ed.). Routledge International Handbook of Qualitative Research in Sport and Exercise. London: Routledge, 2016. p. 230-242.

MINA, K. G.; BIRIA, R. Exploring Interactive and Interactional Metadiscourse Markers in Discussion Sections of Social and Medical Science Articles. International Journal of Research in English Education, v. 2, n. 4, p. 11-29, 2017.

MOCANU, M. An Empirical Analysis of Metadiscourse in the Abstracts of Romanian Accounting Research Articles. Accounting and Management Information Systems, v. 14, n. 2, p. 362-377, 2015.

MOJICA, L. Filipino Author’s Ways of Showing Detachment/Commitment in Their English Academic Papers. In: DAYAG, D.; QUAKENBUSH, J. S. (ed.). Linguistics and Language Education in the Philippines and Beyond: A Festschrift in Honour of Ma. Lourdes S. Bautista. Manila: Linguistic Society of the Philippines, 2005. p. 511-525.

MOZAYAN, M. R.; ALLAMI, H.; FAZILATFAR, A. M. Metadiscourse Features in Medical Research Articles: Subdisciplinary and Paradigmatic Influences in English and Persian Practice. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, v. 9, n. 1, p. 83-104, 2018.

MUR-DUEÑAS, P.; ŠINKŪNIENĖ, J. Self-Reference in Research Articles Across Europe and Asia: A Review of Studies. Brno Studies in English, v. 4, n. 1, p. 71-92, 2016.

PALTRIDGE, B. Genre, Text Type, and the Language Learning Classroom. ELT Journal, v. 50, n. 3, p. 237-243, 1996.

SEOANE, E.; HUNDT, M. Voice Alternation and Authorial Presence: Variation Across Disciplinary Areas in Academic English. Journal of English Linguistics, v. 46, n. 1, p. 3-22, 2018.

SCHNEIDER, M. Failure Aeroacoustic’s Investigation on High-Lift Device by Using a Modern Hybrid RANS/LES-Model. Journal of Aeronautics & Aerospace Engineering, v. 6, n. 3, p. 1-15, 2017.

SWALES, J. Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Setting. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.

THUEVOLD, E. Epistemic Modality Markers in Research Articles: A Crosslinguistic and Cross-Disciplinary Study. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, v. 16, n. 1, p. 61-87, 2006.

WAN, T.; LIU, C. M. Drag Reduction Optimization for Hypersonic Blunt Body With Aerospikes. Journal of Aeronautics & Aerospace Engineering, v. 6, n. 4, p. 1-8, 2017.

ZHANG, M. A Multidimensional Analysis of Metadiscourse Markers Across Written Registers. Discourse Studies, v. 18, n. 2, p. 204-222, 2016.

Published

Nov-Fri-2024