Avaliação, cognição e poder

Authors

  • Vera Lúcia Menezes de Oliveira e Paiva UFMG ##default.groups.name.author##
  • Liliane Assis Sade UFMG ##default.groups.name.author##

Abstract

The process of evaluation reflects the concept adopted by teachers towards teaching. Depending on how they understand this process, the evaluation can only check some learning results or focus the process of teaching/learning, or yet, be used as an instrument of power that frames the asymmetry among the participants in the educative act. Taking the concept of power in Foucault (1989) and applying it to evaluation contexts according to Perrenoud (1999) and Barlow (2006), this paper analyzes some learners memories, having as support researches developed in Cognition, mainly the works of Potter (1995), Sutton (2004), Hampson & Morris (1996), interpreting them under the theoretical assumptions of the new cognitive paradigms that consider the self located in a particular social-historical narrative, in which power relations are implicit in the communicative act and in pedagogical practices.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ANDERSON, R. C.; PICHERT, J. W. Recall of previously unrecallable information following a shift in perspective. Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior, v. 17, p. 1-12, 1978.

BARTLETT, F. C. Remembering: a study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1932.

BAILEY, N.; MADDEN, C.; KRASHEN, S. Is there a "natural sequence" in adult second language learning? Language learning, v. 24, n.1, p. 235-243, 1974.

BARLOW, M. Avaliação escolar; mitos e realidade. Trad. Fátima Murad. Porto Alegre: Artmed, 2006.

BOURDIEU, P. The economics of linguistic exchanges. Social Science Information, 16 (6), p. 645-68, 1977.

BOWER, G. H.; KARLIN, M. B.; DUECK, A. Comprehension and memory for pictures. Memory and Cognition, v. 3, p. 216-220, 1975.

BROWN, H. Douglas. Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. 3. ed. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall Inc., 1994.

CHOMSKY, N. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1965.

CRAIK, F. I. M.; TULVING, E. Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: general, v. 104, p. 268-294, 1975.

DULAY, H.; BURT, M. Should we teach children syntax? Language learning, v. 23, n. 2, p. 245-258, 1973.

FIGUEIREDO, F. J. Q. Aprendendo com erros: uma perspectiva comunicativa de ensino de línguas. Goiânia: Editora UFG, 1997.

FODOR, J. A. The Modularity of Mind. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1983.

______. In Critical Condition: Polemical Essays on Cognitive Science and the Philosophy of Mind. London: MIT Press, 1998.

FOUCAULT, M. Microfísica do poder. 8. ed. Org. e Trad. Roberto Machado. Rio de Janeiro: Edições Graal, 1989a.

FOUCAULT, M. Vigiar e punir: nascimento da prisão. Trad. Lígia M. Ponde Vassallo. Petrópolis: Vozes, 1989b.

FRAWLEY, O. Spenser's Trace: cultural memory and cognition. Disponível em: <http://www.dactyl.org/thought/Poetics-CogSci/frawley.htm >. Acesso em Março/2006.

HAMPSON, P. J.; MORRIS, P. E. Understanding Cognition, Oxford: Blackwell, 1996.

HUBBARD, P. et al. A training course for TEFL. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.

JOHNSON, M.; ROHRER, T. We are live creatures: embodiment, American Pragmatism, and the Cognitive Organism. In: ZLATEV, J. et al. Body, Language, and Mind. v. I. Berlim: Mouton de Gruyter. 2005.

KRESS, Gunther. Linguistic processes in sociocultural practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989.

MACHADO, R. Introdução, por uma genealogia do poder. In: FOUCAULT, M. Microfísica do poder. 8. ed. Org. e Trad. Roberto Machado. Rio de Janeiro: Edições Graal, 1989.

MATURANA, H. R.; VARELA, F. J. Autopoiesis and cognition: the organization of the living. Boston: Reidel, 1980.

PERKINS, K.; LARSEN-FREEMAN, D. The effect of formal language instruction on the order of morpheme acquisition. Language learning: a journal of applied linguistics, v. 25, n.2, p. 237-243, 1975.

PERRENOUD, P. Avaliação: da excelência à regulação das aprendizagens. Porto Alegre: Artmédia, 1999.

PINKER, S. Learnability and Cognition: The Acquisition of Argument Structure. London: MIT Press, 1989.

PONTES, T. S. A avaliação na educação infantil, frente aos novos desafios. Belém: Unama, 2001. Disponível em: <http://www.nead.unama.br/bibliotecavirtual/monografias/Avaliacao_educacao_infantil.pdf >. Acesso em: 13 mar. 2006.

POTTER, M. C. Remembering. In: OSHERSON, D. N.; SMITH, E. E. (Ed.). An invitation to cognitive science: thinking, v. 3, London: MIT Press, 1990-1995. Cap. 1, p. 3-32.

PRIETO, D.; GUTIERREZ, F. A mediação pedagógica - educação a distância alternativa. Campinas: Papirus, 1991.

RUMELHART, D.; McCLELLAND, J. Parallel Distributed Processing: Exploratins in the Microstructure of Cognition. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1986.

RUMELHART, D. E.; SMOLENSKY, P; McCLELLAND, J.; HINTON, G. E. Schemata and Sequential thought processes in PDP models. In: McCLELLAND, J.; RUMELHART, D. E. (Ed.). Parallel Distributed Processing, v. 2. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1986. p. 7-57.

SACHS, J. S. Memory in reading and listening to discourse. Memory and Cognition, v. 2, p. 95-100, 1974.

SUTTON, J. Memory. In: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2004. Disponível em: <http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/memory#3 >. Acesso em: Mar./2006.

VARELA, F. J.; THOMPSON, E.; ROSCH, E. The Embodied Mind, London, 1991.

VARELA, F. J. Connaître les Sciences Cognitives: Tendances et Perspectives. Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 1989.

WISEMAN, S.; NEISSER, U. Perceptual organization as determinant of visual recognition memory. American Journal of Psychology, v. 87, p. 675-681, 1974.

Published

Feb-Sun-2012