A case of Form-Focused Instruction (FFI)

the present subjunctive in Spanish

Authors

  • Gisele Benck de Moraes (UPF) ##default.groups.name.author##

Keywords:

Spanish, form-focused instruction, present subjunctive, foreign language

Abstract

This study investigated how Brazilian students develop their learning with regard to the present subjunctive in Spanish, particularly when they use the conjunctions cuando, aunque, and donde. The research was applied to intermediate students at a private institution in the state of Rio Grande do Sul. Form-Focused Instruction (FFI) was applied as the theoretical framework, with an emphasis on the ideas of Spada (1997, 2008, 2010) and Ellis (2001, 2006, 2009). The research included four stages: pre-test, remedial lessons, immediate post-test, and delayed post-test. TheEdmodo Platform and Team Speak Program were used as tools for oral and written assignments. Data analysis illustrated the ongoing misunderstanding and how much FFI was beneficial for learning the present subjunctive in Spanish.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ANDRÉ, M. E. Etnografia da prática escolar. 11ª. ed. São Paulo: Papirus, 2004.

BOÉSSIO, C. P. D. A transferência indevida do infinitivo flexionado no ensino do espanhol para brasileiros. 2003. Dissertação de mestrado. Universidade Católica de Pelotas, 2003.

COSTA. G. V. M. O uso do presente do modo subjuntivo em língua espanhola: contribuição para aprendizes brasileiros. 2004. Católica de Pelotas: dissertação de mestrado, 2004.

DEKEYSER, R. Learning second language grammar rules: An experiment with a miniature linguistic system. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17, p. 379-410, 1995.

DEKEYSER, R. Beyond focus on form: Cognitive perspective on learning and practicing second language grammar. In: DOUGHTY, C. & Williams, J. (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (p.42-63). 1998. New York: Cambridge University Press.

DEKEYSER, R. Implicit and explicit learning. In: DOUGHTY, C. J.; LONG, M. H (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition Oxford, Massachusetts e Victoria: Blackwell. Publishing, Chap. 11, p.313-348, 2003.

DOUGHTY, C; WILLIAMS, J. Focus on Form in Classroom Second Language Acquisition Cambridge University Press, 1998.

EDMODO. Disponível em: http://www.edmodo.com. Acesso em: 31 out. 2012. » http://www.edmodo.com

ELLIS, R. Second language acquisition Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.

ELLIS, R. Introduction: investigating form-focused instruction.Language Learning 51: Supplement 1. Form-focused instruction and second language learning, p. 1-46, 2001.

ELLIS, R. Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language: a psychometric study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 27, p. 141-72, 2005b.

ELLIS, R. Current issues in the teaching off grammar. An SLA perspective. TESOL Quartely, 40 (1), 83-107, 2006.

ELLIS, R. Task-based language teaching: sorting out the misunderstandings. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, v. 19, n.3, p. 221-246, 2009.

JÚNIOR, Ronaldo Mangueira Lima. Uma investigação dos efeitos do ensino explícito da pronúncia na aula de inglês como língua estrangeira. Revista Brasileira de Lingüística Aplicada, Belo Horizonte, v. 10, n.3, p. 747-771, 2010.

LIMA, M. S.; BORBA, F. R. O professor de língua estrangeira e sua visão do tratamento do erro. In: ROTTAVA, L.; LIMA, M. S. (Orgs.).Linguística Aplicada: relacionando teoria e prática no ensino de línguas. Ijuí: Unijuí, p.224-266, 2004.

LITTLEWOOD. W. La enseñanza comunicativa de idiomas. Cambridge: Madrid, 1996.

MITCHELL, R.; MYLES, F.; MARSDEN, E. Second language learning theoriesThird Edition. London: Routledge, 2013.

NORRIS, J. & ORTEGA, L. Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50, p. 417-528, 2000.

NORRIS, J. & ORTEGA, L. Does Type of Instruction Make a Difference? Substantive Findings From a Meta-analytic Review. In:.Language Learning Supplement: 1 form-focused instruction and second language learning, p. 157-213, 2001.

ROEHR, K. Linguistic and metalinguistic categories in second language learning. Cognitive Linguistics 19, p. 67-106, 2008.

SANKOFF, D.; TAGLIAMONTE, S. A.; SMITH, E. Goldvarb X A multivariate analysis application. Toronto: Departament Linguistic; Ottawa: Departament of Mathematics, 2005.

SPADA, N. Form-focused instruction and second language acquisition: A review of classroom and laboratory research. Language Teaching, 30,p. 1- 15, 1997a.

SPADA, N. Form - focused instruction and second language acquisition: A review of classroom and laboratory research., Language Teaching 30, p. 73-87, 1997b.

SPADA, N.; LIGHTBOWN, P. Form- focused instruction: isolated or integrated. Tesol Quarterly, v. 42, n.2, p. 181-207, 2008.

SPADA, N.; TOMITA, Y. Interactions Between Type of Instruction and Type of Language Feature: A Meta-Analysis Language Learning 60:2, p.263-308, June 2010.

TAGLIAMONTE, S. Analysing Sociolinguistic Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.

TEAM SPEAK. Disponível em: Disponível em: http://www.teamspeak.com/?page=teamspeak3 Acesso em: 30 mar. 2013.

» http://www.teamspeak.com/?page=teamspeak3

VILLALBA, T. K. B. Pepe vio que no tiene jeito, su mujer es así mismo: as delicadas relações lexicais entre a L1 e a L2 na aquisição de español por universitarios brasileiros. 2002. Tese doutorado, UFRGS. Porto Alegre, 2002.

Published

Apr-Mon-2016