Investigating bilinguals’ sensitivity to English regular past morphology: A self-paced reading experiment with Brazilian learners

Marisa Mendonça  Carneiro

Autori

Marisa Mendonça Carneiro Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais Autor

Parole chiave:

Bilingual processing, self-paced reading, inflectional morphology, Distributed Morphology

Abstract

It is known that adult learners of English as an additional language (EAL) have difficulty in producing inflectional morphemes such as the third person present singular -s and regular past -ed. One possible explanation is that bilinguals are not sensitive to inflectional morphemes, in comprehension tasks as evidenced by longer latencies at critical positions in reaction time experiments, when compared to native controls. Having the above in mind, the objective of this paper is to investigate if in fact Brazilian EAL bilinguals are sensitive to regular past morphology in a self-paced reading task. Sentences varied on the use or absence of inflectional morphemes. The statistical analysis showed that EAL speakers are not sensitive to past morphology. The results are discussed in light of Distributed Morphology and of previous studies on production and processing of inflectional morphemes in EAL.

Downloads

La data di download non è ancora disponibile.

Riferimenti bibliografici

ABUTALEBI, J.; CAPPA, S.; PERANI, D. What can functional neuroimaging tell us about the bilingual brain? In: KROLL, J.F.; De GROOT, A.M.B. (Org.). Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005. p. 497-515.

BIBERAUER, T.; ROBERTS, I. Subjects, tense and verb movement in Germanic and Romance. Cambridge occasional Papers in Linguistics, Cambridge, v. 3, p. 24-43, 2008. Available at: http://www.ling.cam.ac.uk/copil/papers/3-biberauer-roberts.pdf >. Retrieved on: 1 Sept. 2016. » http://www.ling.cam.ac.uk/copil/papers/3-biberauer-roberts.pdf

BOND, K. et al. Examining sensitivity to agreement anomalies during online processing. In: RECONSIDERING SLA RESEARCH: DIMENSIONS AND DIRECTIONS. Language Research Forum (SLRF 2010), 2., 2010 Mariland. Proceedings.... Mariland: University of Maryland, United States, 2010.

CAMACHO, J. The Null Subject Parameter revisited. The evolution from null subject Spanish and Portuguese to Dominican Spanish and Brazilian Portuguese. 2012. Available at: http://rci.rutgers.edu/~jcamacho/publications/Romania.pdf >. Retrieved on: 1 Sept. 2016. » http://rci.rutgers.edu/~jcamacho/publications/Romania.pdf

CARNEIRO, M. M. Morfologia de flexão verbal no inglês como L2: uma abordagem a partir da Morfologia Distribuída. 2008. 149f. Thesis (Masters in Linguistic Studies) - Faculdade de Letras, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, 2008.

CLAHSEN, H.; FELSER, C. Grammatical processing in language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, Cambridge, v. 27, p. 3-42, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716406060024 » https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716406060024

DOMÍNGUEZ, L. Knowledge of features in fossilized second language grammars. Second Language Research, Sage Journals, v. 23, n. 2, p. 243-260, 2007.

FITZMAURICE, G.; LAIRD, N.; WARE, J. Applied Longitudinal Analysis. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, 2004.

FRANCESCHINA, F. Morphological or syntactic deficits in near-native speakers? An assessment of some current proposals. Second Language Research, Sage Journals, v. 17, p. 213-246, 2001.

HALLE, M.; MARANTZ, A. Distributed Morphology and the pieces of inflection. In: HALE, K.; KEYSER, S. J. (Org.). The View from Building 20: essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1993. p. 111-176.

HARLEY, H.; NOYER, R. Distributed Morphology. Glot International, v. 4, n. 4, p. 3-9, 1999.

HARLEY, H.; RITTER, E. Person and number in pronouns: a feature-geometric analysis, Language, Washington, Linguistic Society of America, v. 78, n. 3, p. 482-526, Sept. 2002.

HAWKINS, R. Persistent selective fossilisation in second language acquisition and the optimal design of the language faculty. Essex Research Reports in Linguistics, University of Essex, v. 34, p. 75-90, 2000.

HAWKINS, R.; LISZKA, S. Locating the source of defective past tense marking in advanced L2 English speakers. In: VAN HOUT, R. et al. (Org.). The interface between syntax and lexicon in second language acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2003. p. 21-44. https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.30.03haw » https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.30.03haw

HAZNEDAR, B. Missing Surface Inflection in Adult and Child L2 Acquisition. In: Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference (GASLA, 2002), 6th, 2002, Somerville. Proceedings..: Somerville: Cascadilla Proceedings Project, 2002. p. 140-149.

HERSCHENSOHN, J. Missing inflection in second language French: accidental infinitives and other verbal deficits. Second Language Research, Sage Journals, v. 17, n. 3, p. 273-305. 2001.

IONIN, T.; WEXLER, K. Why is ‘is’ easier than ‘-s’?: acquisition of Tense/agreement morphology by child second language learners of English. Second Language Research, Sage Journals, v. 18, n. 2, p. 95-136, 2002.

JIANG, N. Morphological insensitivity in second language processing. Applied Psycholinguistics, Cambridge University Press, v. 25, p. 603-634, 2004.

JIANG, N. Selective integration of linguistic knowledge in adult second language learning. Language Learning, Wiley Online Library, v. 57, n. 1, p. 1-33, 2007.

JUFFS, A. Representation, processing and working memory in a second language. Transactions of the Philological Society, Wiley Online Library, v. 102, n. 2, p.199-225, 2004.

KATO, M.A. A evolução da noção de parâmetros. D.E.L.T.A. - Documentação de Estudos em Linguística Teórica e Aplicada, PUC-SP, v. 18, n. 2, p. 309-337, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-44502002000200006 » https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-44502002000200006

LAKSHMANAN, U.; SEKINKER, L. Analyzing interlanguage: how do we know what learners know? Second Language Research, Sage Journals, v. 17, p. 393-420, 2001.

LARDIERE, D. Case and tense in the ‘fossilized’ steady state. Second Language Research, Sage Journals, v. 14, n. 1, p. 1-26, 1998.

LEONARD, M. et al. Language proficiency modulates the recruitment of non-classical language areas in bilinguals. Plos One, San Francisco, CA, v. 6, n. 3, p. 1-10, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0018240 » https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0018240

LILLO-MARTIN, D. et al. Bimodal bilingual cross-language influence in unexpected domains. In: COSTA, J.; CASTRO, A.; LOBO., M.; PRATAS, F. (Ed.). Language Acquisition and Development: Proceedings of GALA 2009. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Press, 2010. p. 264-275.

LONG, M.H. Stabilization and fossilization in interlanguage development. In: LONG, M.H.; DOUGHTY, C. (Org.). Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub., 2003. p. 487-535. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756492.ch16

» https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756492.ch16

MaCSWAN, J. The architecture of the bilingual language faculty: evidence from intrasentential code switching. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, Cambridge University Press, v. 3, n. 1, p. :37-54, 2000.

McCARTHY, C. Underspecification and default morphology in second language Spanish. In: BOSTON UNIVERSITY CONFERENCE, 29th, 2004, Boston. Proceedings... Boston: University of Boston, 2004. Available at: http://www.bu.edu/bucld/files/2011/05/29-MccarthyBUCLD2004.pdf >. Retrieved on: 1 Sept. 2016. » http://www.bu.edu/bucld/files/2011/05/29-MccarthyBUCLD2004.pdf

McCARTHY, C. What’s missing from missing inflection?: features in L2 Spanish. McGill Working Papers in Linguistics, McGill University, Canada, v. 20, n. 2, p. 1-11, 2006.

McCARTHY, C. Morphological variability in the comprehension of agreement: An argument for representation over computation. Second Language Research, Sage Journals, v. 24, n. 4, p. 459-486, 2008.

MITCHELL, D. On-line methods in language processing: introduction and historical review. In: CARREIRAS, M; CLIFTON JR, C. (Org.). The on-line study of sentence comprehension: eyetracking, ERPs and beyond. New York: Psychology Press, 2004. p. 16-32.

MORRIS, J.; HOLCOMB, P. J. ERPs to violations of inflectional verb morphology. Cognitive Brain Research, Bethesda, v. 25, p. 963-981, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.09.021 » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.09.021

OSTERHOUT, L.; MOBLEY, L. A. Event-related brain potentials elicited by failure to agree. Journal of Memory and Language, Elsevier, v. 34, p. 739-773, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1995.1033 » https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1995.1033

PEARLMUTTER, N. J.; GARNSEY, S. M.; BOCK, K. Agreement processes in sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, Elsevier, v. 41, p. 427-456, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1999.2653 » https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1999.2653

PFAU, R. Grammar as processor: A Distributed Morphology account of spontaneous speech errors. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1075/la.137 » https://doi.org/10.1075/la.137

PRÉVOST, P.; WHITE, L. Missing surface inflection or impairment in second language acquisition? Evidence from tense and agreement. Second Language Research, Sage Journals, v. 16, p.103-133, 2000.

RAPOSO, E. Teoria da gramática: a faculdade da linguagem. Lisboa: Editora Caminho, 1992.

ROTHMAN, J. Sometimes they use it, sometimes they don’t: an epistemological discussion of L2 morphological production and its use as a competence measurement. Applied Linguistics, Oxford Academic, v. 28, n. 4, p. 609-615, 2007.

RULE, S.; MARSDEN, E. The acquisition of functional categories in early French L2 grammars: the use of finite and non-finite verbs in negative contexts. Second Language Research, Sage Journals, v. 22, n. 2, p.188-218, 2006.

SAGARRA, N.; HERSCHENSOHN, J. Proficiency and animacy effects on L2 gender agreement processes during comprehension. Language Learning, Wiley Online Library, v. 61, n. 1, p. 80-116, 2011.

SATO, M.; FELSER, C. Sensitivity to semantic and morphosyntactic violations in L2 sentence processing: Evidence from speeded grammaticality judgments. Essex: University of Essex, 2007.

SELINKER, L. Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, De Gruyter, v. 10, p. 209-231, 1972.

SLABAKOVA, R. What is easy and what is hard to acquire in a second language? In: generative approaches to second language acquisition conference, 10th, 2009, Somervillem. Proceedings... Somervillem: Cascadilla Proceedings Project, 2009. p. 280-294.

SORACE, A. Introduction: Syntactic optionality in nonnative grammars. Second Language Research, Sage Journals, v. 16, p. 93-102, 2000.

TOWELL, R. Representational modularity and second language acquisition research. Transactions of the Philological Society, Wiley Online Library, v. 102, n. 2, p. 281-305, 2004.

TRENKIC, D. Variability in L2 article production: beyond the representational deficit vs. processing constraints debate. Second Language Research, Sage Journals, v. 23, n. 3, p. 289-327, 2007.

WHITE, L. Fossilization in steady state L2 grammars: Persistent problems with inflectional morphology. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, Cambridge Universtity Press, v. 6, n. 2, p.129-141, 2003.

WHITE, L. et al. Gender and number agreement in nonnative Spanish. Applied Psycholinguistics, Cambridge University Press, v. 25, p. 105-133, 2004.

XAVIER, G. R. Aquisição do PB como L2: o sujeito nulo. Revista da ABRALIN, Abralin, v. 7, n. 1, p. 95-127, jan./jun. 2008.