Critical Discourse Analysis and Cognitive Studies
A Proposal for Multimodal Analysis of Former President Sebastián Piñera’s Discourse
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17851/2237-2083.31.4.1763-1790Keywords:
political discourse, multimodality, gestures, migrantsAbstract
In this work, we intend to delve into the importance of using cognitive linguistics tools to describe and explain the functioning of discourses from a critical perspective. In particular, we analyse the way in which the concepts of frames, metaphors, metonyms and image schemes can be used productively for the analysis of the verbal mode and manual gestures. In order to do this, we analyse an interview that former Chilean President Sebastián Piñera gave in 2016 during the campaign prior to his re-election. We conclude that certain manual gestures carry ideational meaning and reinforces discursive strategies present in the verbal mode.
Downloads
References
AEDO, S; FARÍAS, M. Etnofaulismos, coprolalia, representaciones y estrategias discriminatorias: el caso del discurso chileno antiperuano. Discurso y Sociedad, v. 3, n 3, p. 372-396, 2009.
BOLIVAR, A.; FONTAINES-RUIZ, T. El meme como replicador de la xenofobia. Una perspectiva interaccional y crítica. Revista da ABRALIN, v. 20, n. 3, p. 51-77, 2021. DOI 10.25189/rabralin.v20i3.1987
BORZI, C. Gramática cognitiva-prototípica: conceptualización y análisis del nominal. Fundamentos en humanidades, San Luis, v. 13, n. 1, p. 99-126, 2012.
CHARTERIS-BLACK, J. Britain as a container: Immigration metaphors in the 2005 election campaign. Discourse & Society, v. 17, n. 6, p. 563–82, 2006a. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926506066345
CHARTERIS-BLACK, J. Politicians and Rhetoric: The Persuasive Power of Metaphor. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006b.
CHILTON, P. Missing links in mainstream CDA: Modules, blends and the critical instinct. In: WODAK, R.; CHILTON, P. (eds.). A New Research Agenda in (Critical) Discourse Analysis: Theory, Methodology and Interdisciplinarity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2005. p. 19-52.
CHILTON, P. Still something missing in CDA. Discourse Studies, v. 13, n. 6, p. 769-781, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445611421360a
CHILTON, P. Language, Space and Mind: The Conceptual Geometry of Linguistic Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.
CUENCA, M. J.; HILFERTY, J. Introducción a la lingüística cognitiva. Barcelona: Planeta, 1999.
EL REFAIE, E. (2001). Metaphors we discriminate by: Naturalized themes in Austrian
newspaper articles about asylum seekers. Journal of Sociolinguistics, v. 5, n. 3, p. 352–71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9481.00154"https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9481.00154
EKMAN, P.; FRIESEN, W. Unmasking the face. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 1975.
FAIRCLOUGH, N. Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1992.
FAIRCLOUGH, N.; WODAK, R. Análisis crítico del discurso. In: VAN DIJK, T. (ed.). El discurso como interacción social. Estudios sobre el discurso II. Una introducción multidisciplinaria. Barcelona: Gedisa, 2000. p. 367-404.
FILLMORE, C. Frame Semantics. In: Linguistic Society of Korea (ed.). Linguistics in the Morning Calm. Seoul: Hanshin, 1982. p. 11-38.
FLAX, R. El recurso de la metáfora en la construcción política: el caso de La Cámpora. Temas y debates, Rosario, v. 38, p. 13-41, 2019a. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35305/tyd.v0i38.439
FLAX, R. La construcción del inmigrante en el discurso político argentino: el caso del Parque Indoamericano. Revista D.E.L.T.A- Documentação e Estudos em Linguística Teórica e Aplicada, São Paulo, v. 35, n. 4, p. 1-20, 2019b. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-460X2019350411
FLAX, R. El discurso del ex presidente argentino Mauricio Macri con respecto a les migrantes: lo dicho y lo silenciado. Revista Signo y Seña, v. 37, p. 18-36., 2020a. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34096/sys.n37.7975
FLAX, R. Acerca de las dificultades de ser políticamente correcta: el discurso de Cristina Fernández sobre les migrantes. Revista Refracción, v.1, p. 35-61, 2020b.
FLAX, R. La conceptualización de les migrantes en el discurso político argentino del siglo XXI. Revista da Abralin, v. 20, n. 3, p. 78-92, 2021. DOI: 10.25189/rabralin.v20i3.1906
FORCEVILLE, C.; URIOS-APARISI, E. Multimodal Metaphor. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 2009.
FORTE, D. Discurso dominante y borramiento: el caso de los animales no humanos en el conflicto Cresta Roja. LL Journal, New York, v. 15, n. 1, p. 1-26, 2020.
FORTE, D. Music and Discourse: a systemic-functional approach for music analysis in multimodal contexts. Multimodality & Society, v. 3, n. 1, p. 69-81, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/26349795231153963
FOWLER, R. et al. Lenguaje y control. México: Fondo de cultura económica, 1983.
GUALBERTO, C.; BOMFANTE DOS SANTOS, Z.; MEIRA, A. C. Multimodal metaphors: from language as a condition to text to the notion of texture as a meaning-making semiotic resource. Revista Estudos da Linguagem, Belo Horizonte, v. 28, n. 2, p. 893-915, 2020. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17851/2237-2083.28.2.893-915.
HALLIDAY, M. El lenguaje como semiótica social. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 1982.
HALLIDAY, M.; MATTHIESSEN, C. Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar. London/New York: Routledge, 2014.
HART, C. Critical Discourse Analysis and Cognitive Science New Perspectives on Immigration Discourse. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.
HART, C. Discourse, Grammar and Ideology. London: Bloomsbury, 2014.
HART, C.;WINTER, B. Gesture and legitimation in the anti-immigration discourse of Nigel Farage. Discourse & Society, v. 33, n.1, p. 34–55, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/09579265211048560.
HELLÍN, L. Publicidad: en la vida hay que ganar. In: RAITER, A. y ZULLO, J. (eds.). Al filo de la lengua. Medios, publicidad y política. Buenos Aires: La bicicleta ediciones, 2016. p.61-76.
HELLÍN, L. “A rodar mi vida”: representaciones de los jóvenes en la publicidad. In: MENÉNDEZ, S. y CARRIZO, A. (eds.). El Análisis del Discurso en Latinoamérica. Buenos Aires: Facultad de Filosofía y Letras (UBA), 2017. p. 251-260.
HODGE, R.; KRESS, G. Social Semiotics. Cambridge: Polity, 1988.
HODGE, R.; KRESS, G. Language as Ideology. 2. ed. rev. y aum. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Books, 1993.
KRESS, G.; VAN LEEUWEN, T. Reading images. The grammar of visual design. Londres: Routledge, 2006.
LADILOVA, A. Multimodal Metaphors of Interculturereality. Revista Estudos da Linguagem, Belo Horizonte, v. 28, n. 2, p. 917-955, 2020. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17851/2237-2083.28.2.917-955.
LAKOFF, G. Women, Fire and Dangerous Things. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press, 1987.
LAKOFF, G. Moral Politics. How Liberals and Conservatives Think. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press, 2002.
LAKOFF, G. No pienses en un elefante. Lenguaje y debate político. Madrid: Editorial Complutense, 2006.
LAKOFF, G. Why it Matters How We Frame the Environment. Environmental Communication, v. 4, n. 1, p. 70-81, 2010.
LAKOFF, G. ;JOHNSON, M. Metaphors we live by. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press, 2003.
LANGACKER, R. Foundations of cognitive grammar: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1987.
LANGACKER, R. Foundations of Cognitive grammar. Descriptive application. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1991.
LAZAR, M. Feminist critical discourse analysis. In: FLOWERDEW, J. y RICHARDSON, J. (eds.). The Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies. New York: Routledge, 2018. p. 372-387.
MARTÍN ROJO, L. Enfrentamiento y consenso en los debates parlamentarios sobre la política de inmigración en España. Oralia, Almería, v. 3, p. 113-148, 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25115/oralia.v3i1.8510
MARTÍN ROJO, L. A fronteira interior. Análise crítica do discurso: um exemplo sobre “racismo”. In: IÑIGUEZ RUEDA, L. (org.). Manual de análise do discurso em ciencias sociais. Petrópolis: Vozes, 2004.
NORRIS, S. Analyzing Multimodal Interaction: A Methodological Framework. London/New York: Routledge, 2004.
NORRIS, S. Multiparty interaction: a multimodal perspective on relevance. Discourse Studies, v. 8, n. 3, p. 401–421, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445606061878
NORRIS, S. Systematically Working with Multimodal Data. Research Methods in Multimodal Discourse Analysis. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2019.
O'HALLORAN, K. (ed.) Multimodal Discourse Analysis. Systemic-Functional Perspectives. New York and London: Continuum, 2004.
RAMÍREZ LASSO, L. Representaciones discursivas de las migrantes venezolanas en medios digitales. Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios del Discurso, Brasilia, v. 18, n. 2, p. 42-58, 2018.
REISIGL, M.; WODAK, R. Discourse and Discrimination. London: Routledge, 2001.
RIBAS, M.; TODOLÍ, J. La metáfora de la mujer objeto y su reiteración en la publicidad. Discurso y Sociedad, v. 2, n. 1, p. 153-169, 2008.
SPERANDIO, N. The role of multimodal metaphors in the creation of the fake news category: a proposal for analysis. Revista Estudos da Linguagem, Belo Horizonte, v. 28, n. 2, p. 777-799, 2020. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17851/2237-2083.28.2.777-799
TABOADA, M. Nation and migration: a critical review of textbooks for high school education in Argentina. Romanica Olomucensia, Olomouc, v. 28, n. 2, p. 185-202, 2016. DOI: 10.5507/ro.2016.018
THAYS, A. La metáfora conceptual en el discurso político venezolano: Rómulo Betancourt y Hugo Chávez Frías. Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios del Discurso, Brasilia, v. 10, n. 1, p. 9-33, 2010.
TAYLOR, C. Metaphors of migration over time. Discourse & Society, v. 32, n. 4, p. 463–481, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926521992156
VAN DIJK, T. Texto y contexto. Semántica y pragmática del discurso. Madrid: Ediciones Cátedra, 1980.
VAN DIJK, T. Prejudice in Discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1984.
VAN DIJK, T. La ciencia del texto. Un enfoque interdisciplinario. Buenos Aires: Paidós, 1992.
VAN DIJK, T. Analyzing Racism Through Discourse Analysis. Some Methodological Reflections. In: SANFIELD, J.; RUTLEDGE, D. (Eds.). Race and Ethnicity in Research Methods. Newbury Park: Sage, 1993.
VAN DIJK, T. Racismo y análisis crítico de los medios. México: Paidós, 1997.
VAN DIJK, T. Dominación étnica y racismo discursivo en España y América Latina. Barcelona: Gedisa, 2003.
VAN LEEUWEN, T. Discourse and Practice. New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008
VEGA, J. Xenofobia, nacionalismo y COVID-19: la construcción del migrante venezolano en el discurso sobre la vacunación en redes sociales. Lengua y Sociedad, Lima, v. 21, n. 1, p. 129-147, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15381/lengsoc.v21i1.23091
WALSH, C. Gender and discourse. Language and power in politics, the church and organisations. Londres: Longman, 2001.
WODAK, R. Politics of fear. London: Sage, 2015.
WODAK, R.; MATOUSCHEK, B. “We are Dealing with People Whose Origins One Can Clearly Tell Just by Looking”: Critical Discourse Analysis and the Study of Neo-Racism in Contemporary Austria. Discourse & Society, v. 4, n. 2, p. 225-248, 1993. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926599010002002
Esta obra está licenciada com uma Licença 