Biopoetic Organisms of Biopolitics

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53981/destrocos.v6i2.59892

Keywords:

biopolitics, biopoetics, imitation, organism

Abstract

Through social media, contemporary societies, interwoven by biopower and capitalism, produce imitations and copies of scenes that have already become part of social convention and norm. Faced with this type of imitation that has become current currency, it is possible to imitate the cynical type of imitation in an attempt to change, alter, or falsify it, using the lives of other animals as models of imitation, as well as the act of living in accordance with nature. In this way, it would be possible to disobey social conventions and confront the established order. The elaboration of the proposal, structured as a biopoetics of imitation, compiles elements from three examples of imitation to expose the contrast between imitation resulting from contemporary biopower and capitalism; three proposals that encourage the imitation of animality: ethology, community, and biopoetics; and the way of living in accordance with nature related to the organism-centered biological perspective. The conclusion holds that living biopoetically in accordance with the way of being of organisms promises a community whose power of life and telos point to coexistence and coproduction among organisms related to the environment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Jorge Vélez Vega, Center for Research and Teaching in Economics

    Jorge Vélez Vega realiza una estancia posdoctoral en el CIDE. Sus áreas de investigación son la racionalidad biopolítica vinculada con las tecnologías, así como el umbral de modernidad biológica relacionado con la biopoética de la regeneración.

References

BINFORD, Lewis R. En busca del pasado: descifrando el registro arqueológico. Trad. Pepa Gasull. Barcelona: Editorial Crítica, 1991.

CALARCO, Matthew. Turning Back to Nature: Foucault and the Practice of Animality. In: CIMATTI, Felice; SALZANI, Carlo (ed.). The Biopolitical Animal. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2024. pp. 23-39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781399525985.003.0002

CALASSO, Roberto. El cazador celeste. Trad. Edgardo Dobry. Barcelona: Anagrama, 2020.

CANGUILHEM, George. Máquina y organismo. In: Canguilhem, George. El conocimiento de la vida. Barcelona: Anagrama, 1976.

FOUCAULT, Michel. El coraje de la verdad: el gobierno de sí y de los otros II. Curso en el Collège de France (1983-1984). Trad. Horacio Pons. Buenos Aires: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 2011.

HEIDEGGER, Martin. Los conceptos fundamentales de la metafísica: mundo, finitud, soledad. Trad. Alberto Ciria. Madrid: Alianza, 2007.

LAERCIO, Diógenes. Vidas y opiniones de los filósofos ilustres. Alianza Editorial, S. A., Madrid, 2007. (Clásicos de Grecia y Roma).

LEMM, Vanessa. Community and Animality in the Ancient Cynics. In: CIMATTI, Felice; SALZANI, Carlo (ed.). The Biopolitical Animal. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2024. pp. 40-57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781399525985.003.0003

LEWONTIN, Richard. El organismo como sujeto y objeto de la evolución. Scientia, n. 118, pp. 63-82, 1983.

NICHOLSON, Daniel J. Organisms ≠ Machines. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, v. 44, n. 4, p. 669-678, Dec. 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2013.05.014

NICHOLSON, Daniel J. The Return of the Organism as a Fundamental Explanatory Concept in Biology. Philosophy Compass, v. 9, n. 5, p. 347–359, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12128

PLATÓN. La república. Trad. Antonio Gómez Robledo. México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 2016.

PROZOROV, Sergei. From Biopolitics to Biopoetics and Back Again: On a Counterintuitive Continuity in Foucault’s Thought. In: BACKMAN, Jussi; CIMINO, Antonio (ed.). Biopolitics and Ancient Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2022. pp. 168-182. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192847102.003.0009

SHUKIN, Nicole. Animal Capital: rendering Life in Biopolitical Times. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2009.

WEBER, Andreas. Biopoetics: towards an Existential Ecology. Dordrecht: Springer, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-0832-4

WEBER, Andreas. Vivificar: una poética para el Antropoceno. Trad. Juan Manuel Cincunegui. Barcelona: Editorial Kairós, 2022.

Downloads

Published

2025-10-14

How to Cite

VÉLEZ VEGA, Jorge. Biopoetic Organisms of Biopolitics. (Des)troços: revista de pensamento radical, Belo Horizonte, v. 6, n. 2, p. e59892, 2025. DOI: 10.53981/destrocos.v6i2.59892. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/revistadestrocos/article/view/59892. Acesso em: 17 apr. 2026.

Share