Vol. 3 No. 1 (2022): Special Dossier - From the critique of the property apparatus to the bet on the common: bodies, colonialities, worlds (jan/jun 2022)
Special Dossier

Non common

Roberto Esposito
Escola Normal Superior de Pisa, Pisa, Itália
Bio
Ana Suelen Tossige Gomes
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brasil
Bio

Published 2022-09-06

Keywords

  • property,
  • common,
  • negative,
  • modernity

How to Cite

ESPOSITO, R.; GOMES, A. S. T. Non common. (Des)troços: revista de pensamento radical, Belo Horizonte, v. 3, n. 1, p. 66–76, 2022. DOI: 10.53981/destroos.v3i1.40284. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/revistadestrocos/article/view/40284. Acesso em: 5 jul. 2024.

Abstract

In this essay, part of his book Politics and negation: for an affirmative philosophy, the Italian philosopher Roberto Esposito analyses property as a political category of the Modern. As such, property would have been constituted and would operate through the negative, that is, through the denial of its contrary. For, such as it occurs with the sovereignty and freedom, is typical of the fundamental categories of the Modern their definition through the denial of what they are not, remaining constitutionally coupled with their opposites. Archaeologically exploring the modern construction of the institute – from its definition as a natural right, fruit of human labor, until its volatilization as a mere legal title –, Esposito demonstrates that the property was constituted not as a positive entity, but in the form of the negation of the original reality which is in its basis: the common.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. ARISTÓTELES. Política II. Trad. António Campelo Amaral e Carlos Gomes. Lisboa: Vega, 1998.
  2. BARCELLONA, Pietro. L’individualismo propietario. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri, 1987.
  3. BLACKSTONE, William. Commentaries on the laws of England. Oxford: Clarendon: 1766.
  4. DEMOLOMBE, Jean Charles Florent. Traité de la distinction des pouvoirs et des biens. In: DEMOLOMBE, Jean Charles Florent. Cours de Code Napoléon. Paris: Durand et Hachette, 1857-1882.
  5. GROSSI, Paolo. Um altro modo di possedere.L’emersione di forme alternative di proprietá alla coscienza giuridica postunitaria. Milano: Giuffrè, 1977.
  6. KANT, Immanuel. Primeiros princípios metafísicos da doutrina do direito. Trad. Clélia Aparecida Martins. Petrópolis: Vozes, 2019. [E-book].
  7. LOCKE, John. Segundo tratado sobre o governo. In: John Locke. Os Pensadores XVIII. Trad. E. Jacy Monteiro. São Paulo: Abril Cultural, 1973.
  8. ROUSSEAU, Jean Jacques. Do contrato social. In: CIVITA, Victor (ed.). Jean Jacques Rousseau. Os pensadores XXIV. Trad. Lourdes Santos Machado. São Paulo: Abril Cultural, 1973.
  9. SCHIAVONE, Aldo. Ius. L’invenzione romana del diritto in Occidente. Torino: Einaudi, 2005.
  10. THOMAS, Yan. Il valore delle cose. Trad. Michele Spanò. Macerata: Quodlibet, 2015.
  11. TOMÁS DE AQUINO. Suma Teológica VI. Trad. Aldo Vannucchi et al. São Paulo: Loyola, 2002.
  12. XIFARAS, Mikhaïl. La propriété. Étude de philosophie du droit. Paris: Puf, 2004.