¿Es anarquista la teoría política posestructuralista?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53981/destroos.v4i1.47559Palabras clave:
Academia, anti-humanismo, teoria crítica, pós-anarquismo, pós-estruturalismoResumen
Traducción de:
MAY, Todd. Is post-structuralist political theory anarchist? In: EVREN, Süreyyya; ROUSSELLE, Duane. Post-anarchism: a reader. London: Pluto, pp. 41-45, 2011.
Descargas
Referencias
DEWS, Peter. Logics of disintegration. Londres: Verso, 1987.
FOUCAULT, Michael. Histoire de la folie à l’âge classique. Paris: Gallimard, 1972.
FOUCAULT, Michel. Power/knowledge: selected interviews and other writings, 1972-88 (C. Gordon, L. Marshall, J. Mepham e K. Soper, trans.). Nova York: Pantheon, 1980.
FOUCAULT, Michel. Structuralism and Post-structuralism: An Interview with Michel Foucault (conducted by Gerard Raulet). Telos, v. 55, 1983. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3817/0383055195
HABERMAS, Jürgen. The philosophical discourse of modernity (Frederick Lawrence, trans.). Cambridge: MIT Press, 1987.
INGRAM, David. Legitimacy and the Post-Modern Condition: The Political Thought of Jean-François Lyotard. Praxis International, v. 7, n. 3-4, pp. 286-305, 1987-88.
KROPOTKIN, Peter. Kropotkin’s revolutionary pamphlets (R. Baldwin, ed.). Nova York: Dover, 1970.
MERQUIOR, J. G. Foucault. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1985.
SCHURMANN, Reiner. On constituting oneself an anarchist subject. Praxis International, v. 6, n. 13, 1986.
WARD, Colin. Anarchy in Action. London: Allen and Unwin, 1973.
WATSON, Stephen. Jürgen Habermas e Jean-François Lyotard: postmodernism and the crisis of rationality. Philosophy and Social Criticism, v. 10, n. 2, pp. 1-24, 1985. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/019145378401000201
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2023 Todd May; Gustavo de Oliveira Correa

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.




