Debates and Developments after the Work of Ian Hacking
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24117/2526-2270.2026.i20.03Keywords:
Ian Hacking, Historiography of Science, Style of Scientific Reasoning, Human SciencesAbstract
This article reflects on the first decade of Transversal: International Journal for the Historiography of Science (2016-2026) in relation to the most recent years and the enduring intellectual legacy of the philosopher of science Ian Hacking. Starting from the dossier dedicated to Hacking’s work in Transversal (2023), it examines the main historiographical changes associated with the themes Hacking explored within this evolving historiographical landscape, evaluating his interventions in terms of analytical approaches, research objects, and conceptual structures. It also analyzes significant interpretative trends in the reception of Hacking’s work during this period. Finally, it identifies — in addition to the consolidated interpretations of his legacy — gaps, tensions, and persistent unresolved problems in the historiography built around his work, thus pointing out possible lines of critical development.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 María Laura Martínez

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.







