Performance clínica de dois sistemas adesivos em lesões cervicais não-cariosas
30 meses de acompanhamento
Palavras-chave:
Biomedical research, Dentin sensitivity, Dentin-bonding agents, Composite resins, Tooth erosionResumo
Objetivo: Avaliar a performance clínica de dois sistemas adesivos em lesões de Classe V não-cariosas, por 30 meses.
Materiais e Métodos: Sessenta e três lesões cervicais não-cariosas foram restauradas com a resina composta Polofil M (Voco) associada aos sistemas adesivos Futurabond NR (Voco) ou Solobond M (Voco). As restaurações foram executadas seguindo dois protocolos adesivos: o adesivo Futurabond NR foi aplicado pela técnica autocondicionante (G1) e o adesivo Solobond M foi utilizado de acordo com a técnica do condicionamento ácido total (G2). As restaurações foram avaliadas após 7 dias, 6, 18 e 30 meses para os critérios: retenção, descoloração marginal, integridade marginal, sensibilidade pós-operatória e presença de lesão secundária de cárie, de acordo com os critérios USPHS. Os dados foram analisados usando os testes de McNemar e Qui-quadrado (α=0,05).
Resultados: Após 30 meses de acompanhamento, 12 restaurações foram perdidas, 6 de cada grupo. O percentual de escore alfa para cada grupo foi: retenção (G1: 77,8%; G2: 81,2%), descoloração marginal (G1: 66,7%; G2: 80,8%), integridade marginal (G1: 61,9%; G2: 80,8%), sensibilidade pós-operatória (G1: 90,5%; G2: 89,4%) e presença de lesão secundária de cárie (G1: 95,2%; G2: 100%). Não houve diferença estatística entre os grupos para nenhum dos critérios avaliados (p>0,05).
Conclusão: Após 30 meses, os dois sistemas adesivos apresentam desempenhos clínicos semelhantes.
Referências
Perdigão J, Lopes M. The effect of etching time on dentin demineralization. Quintessence Int. 2001; 32:10-26.
Perdigão J, Ritter AV. Adesão aos tecidos dentários. In: Baratieri LN, Monteiro Junior S, Andrada MAC, Vieira LCC, Ritter AV, Cardoso AC. Odontologia restauradora: fundamentos e possibilidades. São Paulo: Santos; 2001. p.83- 128.
Li H, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. Nanoleakage patterns of four dentin bonding systems. Dent Mater. 2000; 16:48-56.
Santini A, Plasschaert AJ, Mitchell S. Effect of composite resin placement techniques on the microleakage of two self-etching dentin-bonding agents. Am J Dent. 2001; 14:132-6.
Irie M, Suzuki K, Watts DC. Immediate performance of self-etching versus system adhesives with multiple light-activated restoratives. Dent Mater. 2004; 20:873-80.
American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs. cceptance program guidelines: dentin and enamel adhesive materials. Chicago: American Dental Association; 2001.
Türkün LS. The clinical performance of one- and two-step self-etching adhesive systems at one year. J Am Dent Assoc. 2005; 136:656-64.
Hickel R, Roulet JF, Bayne S, Heintze SD, Mjor IA, Peters M, et al. Recommendations for conducting controlled clinical studies of dental restorative materials - Science committee project 2/98 - FDI World Dental Federation - Study design (part I) and criteria for evaluation (part II) of direct and indirect restorations including onlays and partial crowns. J Adhes Dent. 2007; 9:121-47.
Cvar JF, Ryge G. Reprint of criteria for the clinical evaluation of dental restorative materials. 1971. Clin Oral Investig. 2005; 9:215-32.
Holland GR, Narhi MN, Addy M, Gangarosa L, Orchardson R. Guidelines for the design and conduct of clinical trials on dentine hypersensitivity. J Clin Periodontol. 1997; 24:808-13.
Peumans M, De Munck J, Van Landuyt KL, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Eight-year clinical evaluation of a 2-step selfetch adhesive with and without selective enamel etching. Dent Mater. 2010; 26:1176-84.
Ritter AV, Swift EJ Jr, Heymann HO, Sturdevant JR, Wilder AD Jr. An eight-year clinical evaluation of filled and unfilled one-bottle dental adhesives. J Am Dent Assoc. 2009; 140:28-37; quiz 111-2.
Wilder AD Jr, Swift EJJr, Heymann HO, Ritter AV, Sturdevant JR, Bayne SC. A 12-year clinical evaluation of a three-step dentin adhesive in noncarious cervical lesions. J Am Dent Assoc. 2009; 140:526-35.
Van Landuyt K, Fieuws S, Van Meerbeek B. Sample size considerations for restorationlongevity randomized controlled trials. J Adhes Dent. 2008; 10:247.
Eliasziw M, Donner A. Application of the McNemar test to non-independent matched pair data. Stat Med. 1991; 10:1981-91.
Van Meerbeek B, Perdigao J, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. The clinical performance of adhesives. J Dent. 1998; 26:1-20.
Gwinnett AJ, Jendresen MD. Micromorphologic features of cervical erosion after acid conditioning and its relation with composite resin. J Dent Res. 1978; 57:543-9.
McCoy RB, Anderson MH, Lepe X, Johnson GH. Clinical success of class V composite resin restorations without mechanical retention. J Am Dent Assoc. 1998; 129:593-9.
Lima Gda S, Ogliari FA, da Silva EO, Ely C, Demarco FF, Carreno NL, et al. Influence of water concentration in an experimental selfetching primer on the bond strength to dentin. J Adhes Dent. 2008; 10:167-72.
Sadr A, Shimada Y, Tagami J. Effects of solvent drying time on micro-shear bond strength and mechanical properties of two self-etching adhesive systems. Dent Mater. 2007; 23:1114-9.
Balkenhol M, Huang J, Wostmann B, Hannig M. Influence of solvent type in experimental dentin primer on the marginal adaptation of Class V restorations. J Dent. 2007; 35:836-44.
Reis A, Loguercio AD, Azevedo CL, de Carvalho RM, da Julio Singer M, Grande RH. Moisture spectrum of demineralized dentin for adhesive systems with different solvent bases. J Adhes Dent. 2003; 5:183-92.
Holmes RG, Rueggeberg FA, Callan RS, Caughman F, Chan DC, Pashley DH, et al. Effect of solvent type and content on monomer conversion of a model resin system as a thin film. Dent Mater. 2007; 23:1506-12.
Tay FR, Gwinnett JA, Wei SH. Relation between water content in acetone/alcohol-based primer and interfacial ultrastructure. J Dent. 1998; 26:147-56.
Burgess JO, Gallo JR, Ripps AH, Walker RS, Ireland EJ. Clinical evaluation of four Class 5 restorative materials: 3-year recall. Am J Dent. 2004; 17:147-50.
Ichim IP, Schmidlin PR, Li Q, Kieser JA, Swain MV. Restoration of non-carious cervical lesions Part II. Restorative material selection to minimise fracture. Dent Mater. 2007; 23:1562-9.
Frankenberger R, Lohbauer U, Roggendorf MJ, Naumann M, Taschner M. Selective enamel etching reconsidered: better than etch-and-rinse and self-etch? J Adhes Dent. 2008; 10:339-44.
Brännström M. Etiology of dentin hypersensitivity. Proc Finn Dent Soc. 1992; 88:7-13.
Mjor IA, Moorhead JE, Dahl JE. Reasons for replacement of restorations in permanent teeth in general dental practice. Int Dent J. 2000; 50:361- 6.
