O uso da força no direito internacional: análise da reação ao 11 de setembro de 2001
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69881/e777yc70Resumo
(ver pdf)Downloads
Referências
BROWNLIE, Ian. Principles of public international law. 5. ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.
CASSESE, Antonio. En qué medida el derecho controla la violência en la comunidad internacional de hoy em día? Revista Internacional de Sociología, n. 2, p. 215-224.
CHEN, Lung-chu. An introduction to contemporary international law: a policy-oriented perspective. 2. ed. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 2000.
CHOMSKY, Noam. 11 de setembro. Rio de Janeiro: Bertrand Brasil, 2002.
COHN, Marjorie. Bombing of Afghanistan is illegal and must be stopped. Disponível em <http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/forum/forumnew36.htm>.
COT, Jean-Pierre, PELLET, Alain (Orgs.). La Charte des Nations Unies. 2. ed. Paris: Economica, 1991.
D'AMATO, Anthony. The invasion of Panama was a lawful response to tyranny. AJIL, 1990, v. 84, n. 2, p. 516-524.
DIEZ de VELASCO, Manuel. Instituciones de derecho internacional públi- co, 13.ed. Madrid: Tecnos, 2001.
DRUMBL, Mark A. Judging terrorist crime, Taliban guilt, self-defense and
western innocence. Disponível em <http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/ terrorismdrumbl.htm>.
FERNÁNDEZ, Joaquín Alcaide. Las actividades terroristas ante el derecho
internacional contemporáneo. Madrid: Tecnos, 2000.
GARDAM, Judith Gail. Proportionality and force in international law. AJIL, 1993, v.87, n.3, p.391-413.
GOWLLAND-DEBBAS, Vera. The limits of unilateral enforcement of community objectives in the framework of UN peace maintenance. EJIL, 2000, v. 11, n. 2, p. 361-383.
HOBSBAWN, Eric. A epidemia da guerra. Folha de S. Paulo. São Paulo, 14 de abr. de 2002. Caderno Mais!, p.4-10. MALANCZUK, Peter. Akehurst's modern introduction to international law, 7.ed. London: Routledge, 1997.
MARTYN, Angus. The right of self-defence under international law - The response to the terrorist attacks of 11 September. Disponível em .
MELLO, Celso D. de Albuquerque. Curso de direito internacional público. 12.ed. Rio de Janeiro: Renovar, 2000. v. 1.
NANDA, Ved P. The validity of the United States intervention in Panama under international law. American Journal of International Law, v. 84, n. 2, p.494- 503, 1990
PELLET, Alain. Brief remarks on the unilateral use of force. European Journal of International Law, v. 11, n. 2, p.385-392, 2000.
PENNA, David R. The right to self-defense in the post-cold war era: The role of the United Nations. Denver Journal of International Law and Policy, v.20, n. 1, p. 41-54, 1991.
RATNER, Michael. An alternative to the use of U.S. Military Force. Dispo- nível em <http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/forum/forumnew32.htm>.
ROSTOW, Eugene V. Until What? Enforcement action of collective self-defense?
American Journal of International Law, v. 85, n. 3, p. 506-516, 1991.
SCHACHTER, Oscar. Self-defense and the rule of law. American Journal of International Law, v. 83, n. 2, p. 259-277, 1989.
Self-help in international law: U.S. Action in the iranian hostages crisis. Journal of International Affairs, v. 37, n. 2, p. 231-246, 1984.
SHAW, Malcolm N. International law. 4.ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
WEDGWOOD, Ruth. Unilateral Action in the UN system. European Journal of International Law, v.11, n.2, p.349-359, 2000
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2020 Lucas Eduardo Freitas do Amaral Spadano
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
