Specificities of the figure of grandparents in brazilian social security law:
a critical-theoretical analysis based on case law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69881/rcaap.v29i1.52358Keywords:
Social Security, Democratic Rule of Law, Judiciary, Grandparents, GrandchildrenAbstract
Social Security is one of the foundations of the Democratic State of Law, and is an expression of the protection of the dignity of the human person by our constitutional order. This article analyzes some precedents of the Superior Court of Justice and some regional courts that deal with the social security benefits of grandparents and grandchildren, when the grandparents assume the creation of the grandchildren, based on the relevant legislation and doctrine. The aim was to ascertain the tendencies of the infra-constitutional court and lower courts when judging claims brought by grandparents who have performed the traditional role of parents, and it was concluded, despite certain differences, that there is a consensus in the national judiciary regarding the need to equalize the situations and provide grandparents and grandchildren with the social security benefits consistent with the subsistence of these family units.
Downloads
References
BRASIL. Superior Tribunal de Justiça. Recurso Especial nº 528.987/SP. 5ª Turma, Relatora Ministra Laurita Vaz, data de julgamento: 06/11/2003, DJe 9/12/2003.Disponível em: https://jurisprudencia.s3.amazonaws.com/STJ/IT/RESP_528987_SP_06.11.2003.pdf?AWSAccessKeyId=AKIARMMD5JEAO67SMCVA&Expires=1713734745&Signature=3gTCzDQ2BN%2FpbkWEsKur0sYnhCw%3D. Acesso em: 29 nov.2023.
BRASIL. Superior Tribunal de Justiça. Recurso Especial nº1.635.649/SP. 3ª Turma, Relatora Ministra Nancy Andrighi, data de julgamento: 27/02/2018, DJe 02/03/2018. Disponível em: https://processo.stj.jus.br/processo/revista/documento/mediado/?componente=ITA&sequencial=1678070&num_registro=201602733123&data=20180302&formato=PDF. Acesso em: 29 nov.2023.
BRASIL. Superior Tribunal de Justiça. Recurso Especial nº 1.947.690/DF. 2ª Turma, Relatora Ministra Assusete Magalhães, data de julgamento: 17/05/2022, DJe 23/05/2022. Disponível em: https://processo.stj.jus.br/processo/revista/documento/mediado/?componente=ITA&sequencial=2174643&num_registro=202102087830&data=20220523&formato=PDF. Acesso em: 29 nov.2023.
BRASIL. Superior Tribunal de Justiça. Recurso Especial nº 1.574.859/SP. 2ª Turma, Relator Ministro Mauro Campbell Marques, data de julgamento:08/11/2016, DJe 14/11/2016. Disponível em: https://processo.stj.jus.br/processo/revista/documento/mediado/?componente=ITAsequencial=1549454&num_registro=201503187353&data=20161114formato=PDF. Acesso em: 1º dez.2023.
BRASIL. Tribunal Regional Federal da 4ª Região. Turma Regional de Uniformização (TRU) -Previdenciária. Pedido de Uniformização de Interpretação de Lei (TRU) Nº 5043905-06.2019.4.04.7000 (Processo Eletrônico -E-Proc V2 -TRF).Relatora Juíza Federal Alessandra Gunther Favaro, data do julgamento: 29/04/2022. Disponível em: https://consulta.trf4.jus.br/trf4/controlador.php?acao=consulta_processual_resultado_pesquisa&selForma=NU&txtValor=50439050620194047000&selOrigem=TRF&chkMostrarBaixados=1. Acesso em: 18 nov.2023.
CASTRO, C. A. P. D.; LAZZARI, J. B. Manual de Direito Previdenciário. 23. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Forense, 2020.
KERTZMAN, I. Curso prático de Direito Previdenciário. 17. ed. São Paulo: Juspodivm, 2019.
MARTINEZ, W. N. A prova no Direito Previdenciário. 4. ed. São Paulo: LTr, 2015.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Gabriel Silveira Azevedo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
