RESISTING CLOSURE

THE REPRESENTATION OF OPHELIA ON PAINTING AND SCREEN

Autores

  • Érika Viviane Costa Vieira UFMG

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17851/1982-0739.9..91-98

Palavras-chave:

Ophelia, Shakespeare, Hamlet, feminist criticism, visual arts

Resumo

Based on representations of the character of Ophelia invisual arts and in the readings of traditional literarycriticism of Shakespeare, this paper seeks to question aperverse aesthetics that conjoins women and death.

Downloads

Os dados de download ainda não estão disponíveis.

Biografia do Autor

  • Érika Viviane Costa Vieira, UFMG
    Mestre em Letras: Literatura e outros Sistemas Semióticos (Área de concentração: Literaturasde Expressão Inglesa), 2004

Referências

Bronfen, Elizabeth. Over Her Dead Body: Death, Femininityand the Aesthetic. New York: Routledge, 1992.

Brooker, Peter. Representation. In: A Concise Glossary of Cultural Theory. London, Sydney, Auckland: Oxford University Press, p. 192-93, 1999.

Dane, Gabriele. “Reading Ophelia’s Madness.” Exemplaria. v. 10.2, 1998, <http://www.english.ufl.edu/exemplaria/danefram.htm>. 28 August 2002.

Diniz, Thaïs F. N. Literatura e cinema: da semiótica à tradução cultural. Ouro Preto: Editora UFOP, 1999.

Gilbert, S.; Susan Gubar. The Madwoman in the Attic: The Woman Writer and the Nineteenth Century Literary Imagination. Yale UP, 1985.

Guedes, Peonia Viana. Dialogando com Shakespeare: Uma Versão Feminista Contemporânea de King Lear em A Thousand Acres, de Jane Smiley. GT A Mulher na Literatura/XVII Encontro da ANPOLL (2002): 9 pages. 26-28 Jun. 2002. 2 Nov. 2004. <http://www.amulhernaliteratura.ufsc.br/artigo_peonia2.htm>.

Hall, Stuart. Introduction. Representations: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices. Ed. Stuart Hall. London, etc.: SAGE Publications, in association with The Open University, p. 1-11, 1997.

Humm, Maggie. The Dictionary of Feminist Theory. Columbus: Ohio State UP, 1995.

Hutcheon, Linda. A Theory of Parody: The Teachings of Twentieth-Century Art Forms. London and New York: Methuen& Co., 1985.

Lacan, Jacques. Hamlet, por Lacan. In.: Shakespeare, Duras, Wedekind, Joyce. Trad. Eunice Marinho. Lisboa: Assírio & Alvim, 1989.

Mitchell, W.J.T. Representation. Critical Terms for Literary Study, ed. Frank Lentricchia and Thomas McLaughlin. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, p.11-22, 1995.

Neely, Carol Thomas. Feminist Criticism and Teaching Shakespeare. ADE Bulletin, v. 87, p. 15-18, Fall 1987.<http://www.mla.org/ade/bulletin/n087/087015.htm> 25 August 2003.

Poe, Edgar Allan. The Poetic Principle. The Poems and Three Essays on Poetry. R. Brimley Johnson (Ed.). London and New York: Oxford UP, p. 165-187, 1927.

______. The Philosophy of Composition. The Poems and Three Essays on Poetry. R. Brimley Johnson (Ed.). London and New York: Oxford UP, p. 189-202, 1927.

Ronk, Martha C. “Representations of Ophelia.” Criticism, v. 36, p. 21-43, 1994.

Rose, Jacqueline. “Sexuality in the Reading of Shakespeare: Hamlet and Measure for Measure.” Alternative Shakespeares. Ed. John Drakakis. London and New York: Methuen, p. 95-118, 1985.

Santos, Marlene Soares dos. Shakespeare e a crítica feminista. Caderno de Letras da UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro, v.8, p. 119-26, 1992.

Shakespeare, William. Hamlet. New York: Dover Thrift Editions, 1992.

Showalter, Elaine. Female Malady: Women, Madness and the English Culture 1830-1980. New York: Penguin Books,1987.

______. Representing Ophelia: Women, Madness, and the Responsibilities of Feminist Criticism. Shakespeare and the Question of Theory. Ed. Patricia Parker and Geoffrey Hartman. New York: Routledge, p. 77-94, 1993.

Thompson, Ann “The Warrant of Womanhood: Shakespeare and Feminist Criticism. The Shakespeare Myth. Ed. Graham Holderness. New York: Manchester University Press, p. 74-88, 1988.

Downloads

Publicado

2005-12-31

Edição

Seção

Em Tese