VAMOS CONVERSAR SOBRE AUTORIA?
SHALL WE TALK ABOUT AUTHORSHIP?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-21172022240112Palavras-chave:
autoriaResumo
Downloads
Referências
Bošnjak, L., & Marušić, A. (2012). Prescribed practices of authorship: review of codes of ethics from professional bodies
and journal guidelines across disciplines. Scientometrics 93, 751–763. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0773-y
Brand, A., Allen, L., Altman, M., Hlava, M., & Scott, J. (2015) Beyond authorship: attribution, contribution,
collaboration, and credit. Learned Publishing, 28, 151–155. https://doi.org/10.1087/20150211
Claxton, L. (2005). Scientific authorship: Part 2. History, recurring issues, practices, and guidelines. Mutation Research/
Reviews in Mutation Research, 589(1), 31-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrrev.2004.07.002.
COPE Council. (2014). What constitutes authorship? COPE Discussion Document. Consultado em 05 abr. 2022.
Disponível em https://publicationethics.org/files/Authorship_DiscussionDocument.pdf
COPE Council. (2021). COPE Flowcharts and infographics — Full set — English. Versão 2: Mar. 2021. https://doi.
org/10.24318/cope.2019.2.26
CSE (2018). White Paper on Promoting Integrity in Scientific Journal Publications. Wheat Ridge, CO: 2018. Disponível
em: https://www.councilscienceeditors.org/wp-content/uploads/CSE-White-Paper_2018-update-050618.pdf
Garfield, E. (1982). More on the ethics of scientific publication: abuses of authorship attributions and citation amnesia
undermine the reward system of science. Essays Inform. Sci., 5, 621-626.
Harvey, L.A. (2018). Gift, honorary or guest authorship. Spinal Cord, 56, 91. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41393-017-0057-8
ICMJE (2021). Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical
Journals. Consultado em 29 mar. 2022. Disponível em http://www.icmje.org/icmje-recommendations.pdf
Larkin M. (1999). Whose article is it anyway? Lancet, 354, 1563. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)75272-7
Lima, J., & Farias, M. G. (2020) Autoria em produções científicas: conceitos, critérios, integridade na pesquisa e
responsabilidade na colaboração. Investig. bibl [online].
McNutt, M.K., Bradford, M., Drazen, J., Hanson, B., Howard, B., Jamieson, K.H., Kiermer, V., Marcus, E., Pope,
B.K., Schekman, R., Swaminathan, S., & Stang, P., Verma, I. (2018). Transparency in authors’ contributions and
responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication. PNAS [online]. 115 (11) 2557-2560. https://doi.
org/10.1073/pnas.1715374115
Patterson, M. (2007). Roll credits: sometimes the authorship byline isn’t enough. Guest PLoS Blog by Michael Molla
and Tim Gardner. Postado em 6 nov. 2007. Consultado em 05 mai. 2022. Disponível em https://theplosblog.plos.
org/2007/11/roll-credits-sometimes-the-authorship-byline-isnt-enough/
Rennie, D., Yank, V., & Emanuel, L. (1997). When authorship fails. A proposal to make contributors accountable.
JAMA, 278(7): 579–585. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.1997.03550070071041
Quaia, E., & Crimi’, F. (2021). Honorary Authorship: Is There Any Chance to Stop It? Analysis of the Literature and
a Personal Opinion. Tomography, 7(4):801-803. https://doi.org/10.3390/tomography7040067