DIFERENÇAS DE GÊNERO NAS PREFERÊNCIAS DISCIPLINARES E PROFISSIONAIS DE ESTUDANTES DE NÍVEL MÉDIO: RELAÇÕES COM A EDUCAÇÃO EM CIÊNCIAS
GENDER DIFFERENCES IN HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS' PREFERENCES ON SUBJECT MATTERS AND PROFESSIONAL CHOICES: CONNECTIONS WITH SCIENCE EDUCATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-21172011130208Palabras clave:
Linguagem; Diferenças de Gênero; Preferências Disciplinares e Profissionais.Resumen
Este artigo investiga diferenças de gênero no discurso de estu dantes sobre suas preferências por disciplinas e profissões. A análise encontra-se pautada na filosofia da linguagem de Bakhtin e orienta-se em direção às seguintes questões: Meninos e meninas adotam estilos de lin guagem diferentes quando abordam suas preferências disciplinares e pro fissionais? Como os estilos adotados podem estar relacionados às dispari dades de gênero na educação científica? Um total de 362 estudantes do Ensino Médio de três escolas brasileiras respondeu por escrito a um con junto de questões abertas. Os resultados obtidos somam-se à literatura nacional e internacional e avançam ao ilustrar aspectos socioculturais envolvidos em diferentes padrões de socialização, moldando de formas distintas o discurso de meninos e meninas.
This study investigates gender differences in students' speech when approaching their preferences on school subjects and professional choices. The analysis is based on Bakhtin's philosophy of language and is oriented toward the following research questions: Do boys and girls adopt different language styles when addressing their preferences on school subjects and professional choices? How may these styles be related to gender disparities in science education? An amount of 362 Brazilian high school students answered a set of open questions. The results add to the national and international literature but go forward providing examples of cultural aspects involved in different socialization patterns, shaping boys and girls' discourse in different ways.
Referencias
BAKHTIN, M. M. Discourse in the Novel. In: BAKHTIN, M. M.The Dialogic Imagination. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1981. p. 259-421.
BAKHTIN, M. M. Speech genres & other late essays. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1986. 177p.
BAKHTIN, M. M. Marxismo e Filosofia da Linguagem. 12 ed. São Paulo: Hucitec, 2006. 203p.
BELENKY, M. F. et al. Women's ways of knowing. The development of self, body, and mind. New York, NY: Basic Books, 1986. 258p.
BROTMAN, J. S.; MOORE, F. M. Girls and science: A review of four themes in the science edu cation literature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, New York, v. 45, n. 9, p. 971-1002, 2008.
CHODOROW, N. Psicanálise da maternidade: uma crítica a Freud a partir da mulher. Rio de Janeiro: Rosa dos Tempos, 1990. 319p.
FERREIRA, M. M. Gender Issues Related to Graduate Student Attrition in Two Science Departments. International Journal of Science Education, London, v. 25, n. 8, p. 969-989, 2003.
GILBERT, J.; CALVERT, S. Challenging accepted wisdom: Looking at the gender and science edu cation question through a different lens., International Journal of Science Education v. 25, n. 7, p. 861- 878, 2003.
GILLIGAN, C. In a different voice:Psychological theory and women's developmentCambridge: Harvard University Press, 1993. 184p.
HARDING, S. The science question in feminism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1986. 271p.
HAZARI, Z.; TAI, R. H.; SADLER, P. M. Gender Differences in Introductory University Physics Performance: the influence of high school physics preparation and affective factors. Science Education, New York, v. 91, n. 6, p. 847-876, 2007.
HOLQUIST, M. Dialogism: Bakhtin and his world. New York: Routledge. 1990. 200p.
JOHNSON, A. C. Unintended Consequences: how science professors discourage women of color. Science Education, New York, v. 91, n. 5, p. 805-821, 2007.
JONES, M. G.; HOWE, A.; RUA, M. J. Gender Differences in Students' Experiences, Interests, and Attitudes Toward Science and Scientists., Science Education New York, v. 84, n. 2, p. 180-192, 2000.
KAHVECI, A.; SOUTHERLAND, S. A.; GILMER, P. J. From Marginality to Legitimate Peripherality: understanding the essential functions of a women's program., Science Education New York, v. 92, n. 1, p. 33-64, 2008.
LABUDDE, P. et al. Girls and physics: Teaching and learning strategies tested by classroom inter ventions in grade 11., International Journal of Science Education v. 22, n. 2, p. 143-157, 2000.
LAWS, P. W.; ROSBOROUGH, P. J.; POODRY, F. J. Women's Responses to an Activity-Based Introductory Physics Program. American Journal of Physics, Melville, v. 67, n. 7, p. S32-S37, 1999.
LEMKE, Jay L. Aprender a hablar ciencia: Lenguaje, aprendizaje y valores. Barcelona: Paidós, 1990. 273p.
LEMKE, J. L. Articulating communities: Sociocultural perspectives on science education., Journal of Research in Science Teaching Maryland, v. 38, n. 3, p. 296-316, 2001.
MORTIMER, E. F.; SCOTT, P. H. Meaning making in secondary science classroom. Maidenhead: Open University Press, 2003. 141p.
OSBORNE, J.; SIMON, S.; COLLINS, S. Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications., International Journal of Science Education v. 25, n. 9, p. 1049-1079, 2003.
ROTH, W.-M. Talking science: language and learning in science classrooms. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield, 2005. 275p.
ROYCHOUDHURY, A.; TIPPINS, D. J.; NICHOLS, S. E. Gender-inclusive science teaching: a feminist-constructivist approach., Journal of Research in Science Teaching Maryland, v. 32, n. 9, p. 897 -924, Abr. 1995.
SCHIBECI, R.A. Attitudes to science: An update. Studies in Science Education v. 11, p. 26-59, 1984.
SCOTT, P. H.; MORTIMER, E. F AGUIAR, O. G. The tension between authoritative and dialog ic discourse: a fundamental characteristic of meaning making interactions in high school science lessons., Science Education Pennsylvania, v. 90, n. 4, p. 605-631, 2006.
SEYMOUR, E. The loss of women from science, mathematics and engineering undergraduate majors: an exploratory account., Science Education Pennsylvania, v. 79, n. 4, p. 437-473, 1995.
SJ0BERG, S.; SCHREINER, C. How do learners in different cultures relate to science and techlonoly? Results and perspectives from the project ROSE (the Relevance of) Science Education. APFSET - Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, v. 7(1), Foreword.{s.d.}
TINDALL, T.; HAMIL, B. Gender disparity in science education: the causes, consequences, and solutions. Education, v. 125, n. 2, p. 282-295, Dez. 2004.
TOLENTINO-NETO, L. C. B. Os interesses e as posturas dejovens alunos frente à Ciência: resultados do projeto ROSE aplicado no Brasil. 2008. 172 f. Tese (Doutorado em Educação) - Faculdade de Educação, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2008.
WEINBURGH, M. Gender differences in student attitudes toward science: a meta-analysis of the literature from 1970 to 1991., Journal of
Research in Science Teaching Maryland, v. 32, n. 4, p. 387-398, 1995.
WERTSCH, J. Voces de la Mente: un enfoque sociocultural para el studio de la acción mediada. Madrid: Visor, 1991. 184p.
ZOHAR, A. Her physics, his physics: gender issues in Israeli advanced placement physics classes., International Journal of Science Education, Reading, v. 25, n. 2, p. 245-268, 2003.
ZOHAR, A. Connected knowledge in science and mathematics education.,. International Journal of Science Education, Reading, v. 28, n. 13, p. 1579-1599, 2006.
