Praxiological theories of perception and the concentricity of space, own body and intersubjectivity

Authors

  • Danilo Saretta Verissimo Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio Mesquita – Campus Assis

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35699/1676-1669.2021.19976

Keywords:

perception, space, body, intersubjectivity, phenomenology

Abstract

We circumscribe and examine, in this theoretical paper, lines of study, conceptual networks and discussions about perception that stand out in the scope of what we call praxiological theories of perceptual intentionality. We are guided, in theoretical and methodological terms, by the phenomenological tradition. We start from the assumption, present in the phenomenological approaches of perception, of the concentricity among the perceptual experience of space, of the own body and of others. Combined with these three concentric axes, we listed, for discussion, the problems of perceptual attention and amodal perception, scheme and body image, and joint attention and mirror neurons. In the analysis, the bonds between perception and action are reinforced, which brings us closer to an embodied and situated conception of subjectivity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Danilo Saretta Verissimo, Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio Mesquita – Campus Assis

Danilo Saretta Verissimo é Professor-Associado Livre-docente do Departamento de Psicologia Social da Faculdade de Ciências e Letras – UNESP Campus Assis.

References

Barbaras, R. (2006). Préface. Em G. Simondon. Cours sur la perception (pp.IX-XVI). Paris: PUF.

Berthoz, A. (2004). Physiologie du changement de point de vue. Em A. Berthoz & G. Jorland. L’empathie (pp.251-275). Paris: Odile Jacob.

Berthoz, A. & Petit, J-L. (2006). Phénoménologie et physiologie de l’action. Paris: Odile Jacob.

Bimbenet, E. (2011a). L’animal que je ne suis plus. Paris: Gallimard.

Bimbenet, E. (2011b). Après Merleau-Ponty: études sur la fécondité d’une pensée. Paris: Vrin.

Bimbenet, E. (2015). L’invention du réalisme. Paris: Les Éditions du Cerf.

Briscoe, R. & Grusch, R. (2015). Action-based theories of perception. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Recuperado em 7 de dezembro, 2015, de http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2015/entries/action-perception/.

Carpenter, M., Nagell, K. & Tomasello, M. (1998). Social cognition, joint attention and communicative competence from 9 to 15 months of age. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 63(4), 1-142. Recuperado em 7 de abril, 2021, de www.jstor.org/stable/1166214.

Freyd, J. & Finke, R. (1984). Representational momentum. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10(1), 126-132. Recuperado em 7 de abril, 2021, de https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1984-16934-001.

Gallagher, S. (2005). How the body shapes the mind. Oxford/ New York: Oxford University Press.

Gallagher, S. & Zahavi, D. (2008). The phenomenological mind: an introduction to philosophy of mind and cognitive science. London/ New York: Routledge.

Gennart, M. (2011). Corporeité et présence: jalons pour une approche du corps dans la psychose. Argenteuil: Le Cercle Herméneutique.

Gurwitsch, A. (1957). Théorie du champ de la conscience. Bruges: Desclée de Brouwer.

Husserl, E. (1963). Recherches logiques: éléments d’une élucidation phénoménologique de la connaissance (Vol.3) Paris: PUF. (Original publicado em 1901).

Husserl. E. (1989). Chose et espace: leçons de 1907 (J.-F. Lavigne, trad.). Paris: PUF. (Original publicado em 1973).

Husserl, E. (2001). Idées directrices pour une phénoménologie et une philosophie phénoménologique pures (P. Ricoeur, trad.). Paris: Gallimard. (Original publicado em 1913).

Kelly, S. (2008). Content and constancy: phenomenology, psychology, and the content of perception. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 76(3), 682-690. Recuperado em 7 de abril, 2021, de https://www.jstor.org/stable/40041205.

Leder, D. (1990). The absent body. Chicago/ Londres: The University of Chicago Press.

Mack, A. (2003). Inattentional blindness: looking without seeing. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12(5), 180-184. Recuperado em 7 de abril, 2021, de https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1111/1467-8721.01256.

Masangkay, Z., McCluskey, K., McIntyre, C., Sims-Knight, J., Vaughn, B. & Flavell, J. (1974). The early development of inferences about the visual percepts of others. Child Development, 45(2), 357-366. Recuperado em 7 de abril, 2021, de https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1111/1467-8721.01256.

Meltzoff, A., Kuhl, P., Movella, J. & Sejnowski, T. (2009). Foundations for a new science of learning. Science, 325, 284-288. Recuperado em 7 de abril, 2021, de https://science.sciencemag.org/content/325/5938/284.long.

Merleau-Ponty, M. (1945). Phénoménologie de la perception. Paris: Gallimard.

Merleau-Ponty, M. (1996). Le primat de la perception et ses conséquences philosophiques. Lagrasse: Verdier.

Merleau-Ponty, M. (1997). Les relations avec autrui chez l’enfant. Em M. Merleau-Ponty, Parcours: 1935-1951 (pp.147-229). Lagrasse: Verdier (Original publicado em 1951).

Merleau-Ponty, M. (2001). Psychologie et pédagogie de l’enfant: cours de Sorbonne 1949-1952. Lagrasse: Verdier.

Michotte, A. (1955). Perception et cognition. Acta Psychologica, 11, 70-91.

Michotte, A., Thinès, G., & Crabbé, G. (1964). Les compléments amodaux des structures perceptives. Louvain/Paris: Publications Universitaires de Louvain, Éditions Béatrice-Nauwelaerts.

Moll, H. & Meltzoff, A. (2011). Joint attention as the fundamental basis of understanding perspectives. Em A. Seemann (Ed.). Joint Attention: new developments in psychology, philosophy of mind, and social neuroscience (pp.393-413). Massachusetts: MIT Press.

Moll, H. & Tomasello, M. (2006). Level I perspective-taking at 24 months of age. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 24, 603-613. Recuperado em 7 de abril, 2021, de https://bpspsychub.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1348/026151005X55370.

Noë, A. (2004). Action in perception. Cambridge/London: The MIT Press.

Noë, A. (2012). Varieties of presence. Cambridge (Mass.)/London: Harvard University Press.

Noë, A. & O’Regan, K. (2002). On the brain-basis of visual consciousness: a sensorimotor account. Em A. Noë & E. Thompson (orgs.). Vision and mind: selected readings in the philosophy of perception (pp.567-598). Cambridge/London: The MIT Press.

Noë, A. & Thompson, E. (2002). Introduction. Em A. Noë & E. Thompson (Eds.). Vision and mind: selected readings in the philosophy of perception (pp.01-14). Cambridge/London: The MIT Press.

Petitot, J., Varela, F., Pachoud, B. & Roy, J-M. (Eds.). (1999). Naturalizing phenomenology: issues in contemporary phenomenology and cognitive science. Stanford: Stanford California Press.

Piaget, J. & Inhelder, B. (1948). La représentation de l’espace chez l’enfant. Paris: PUF.

Rensink, R., O’Regan, J. & J. Clark (1997). To see or not to see: the need for attention to perceive changes in scenes. Psychological Science, 8(5), 368-373. Recuperado em 7 de abril, 2021, de https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00427.x.

Rizzolatti, G., Fadiga, L., Gallese, V. & Fogassi, L. (1996). Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. Cognitive Brain Research, 3, 131-141. Recuperado em 7 de abil, 2021, de https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0926641095000380.

Rizzolatti, G. & Sinigaglia, C. (2008). Les neurons miroirs (M. Raiola, Trad.). Paris: Odile Jacob.

Sartre, J-P. (1980). L’être et le néant: essai d’ontologie phénoménologique. Paris: Gallimard. (Original publicado em 1943).

Sévérac, P. (2004). La perception. Paris: Ellipses.

Simons, D. & Chabris, C. (1999). Gorillas in our midst: sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events. Perception, 28(9), 1059-1074. Recuperado em 7 de abril, 2021, de https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/p281059.

Simons, D. & Levin, D. (1997). Change blindness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1(7), 261-267. Recuperado em 7 de abril, 2021, de https://www.cell.com/trends/cognitive-sciences/fulltext/S1364-6613(97)01080-2.

Tomasello, M. (1999). The cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Trevarthen, C. (2011). The generation of human meaning: how shared experience grows in infancy. Em A. Seemann (Org.). Joint Attention: new developments in psychology, philosophy of mind, and social neuroscience (pp.73-113). Massachusetts: MIT Press.

Tse, P. (1999). Volume completion. Cognitive Psychology, 39, 37-68. Recuperado em 7 de abril, 2021, de https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0010028599907156.

Van Lier, R. & Gerbino, W. (s/d). Perceptual completions. [Texto da internet]. Recuperado em 27 de abril, 2021, de http://gestaltrevision.be/pdfs/oxford/van_Lier&Gerbino-Perceptual_completions.pdf.

Varela, F., Thompson, E. & Rosch, E. (1993). The embodied mind: cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge (Mass.)/London: MIT Press.

Wagemans, J., Kubovy, M., Peterson, M.; Elder, J., Palmer, S. & Singh, M. (2012). A century of Gestalt Psychology in visual perception: I. Perceptual grouping and figure-ground organization. Psychological Bulletin, 138(6), 1172-1217. Recuperado em 7 de abril, 2021, de https://doi.apa.org/doiLanding?doi=10.1037%2Fa0029333.

Wagemans, J., Van Lier, R. & Scholl, B. (2006). Introduction to Michotte’s heritage in perception and cognition research. Acta Psychologica, 123, 1-19. Recuperado em 7 de abril, de https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0001691806000758?via%3Dihub.

Published

2021-05-03

How to Cite

Verissimo, D. S. (2021). Praxiological theories of perception and the concentricity of space, own body and intersubjectivity. Memorandum: Memory and History in Psychology, 38. https://doi.org/10.35699/1676-1669.2021.19976

Issue

Section

Articles